OSMAR KENJI YAGI

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
10
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 18
  • article
    GASTRIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR: REVIEW AND UPDATE
    (2017) DIAS, Andre Roncon; AZEVEDO, Beatriz Camargo; ALBAN, Luciana Bastos Valente; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; JACOB, Carlos Eduardo; BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; CECCONELLO, Ivan; RIBEIRO-JR, Ulysses; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno
    ABSTRACT Introduction: The frequency of gastric neuroendocrine tumors is increasing. Reasons are the popularization of endoscopy and its technical refinements. Despite this, they are still poorly understood and have complex management. Aim: Update the knowledge on gastric neuroendocrine tumor and expose the future perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. Method: Literature review using the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO. Search terms were: gastric carcinoid, gastric neuroendocrine tumor, treatment. From the selected articles, 38 were included in this review. Results: Gastric neuroendocrine tumors are classified in four clinical types. Correct identification of the clinical type and histological grade is fundamental, since treatment varies accordingly and defines survival. Conclusion: Gastric neuroendocrine tumors comprise different subtypes with distinct management and prognosis. Correct identification allows for a tailored therapy. Further studies will clarify the diseases biology and improve its treatment.
  • article 9 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Resultados da gastrectomia D2 para o câncer gástrico: dissecção da cadeia linfática ou ressecção linfonodal múltipla?
    (2012) ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; MUCERINO, Donato Roberto; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Ulysses; LOPASSO, Fabio Pinatel; BRESCIANI, Claudio; JACOB, Carlos Eduardo; COIMBRA, Brian Guilherme Monteiro Marta; CECCONELLO, Ivan
    BACKGROUND: Eastern literature is remarkable for presenting survival rates for surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma superior to those presented in western countries. AIM: To analyze the long-term result after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: Two hundred seventy four underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection as exclusive treatment. The inclusion criteria were: 1) lymph node removal according to Japanese standardized lymphatic chain dissection; 2) potentially curative surgery described in medical records as D2 or more lymph node dissection; 3) tumoral invasiveness of gastric wall restricted to the organ (T1 - T3); 4) absence of distant metastasis (N0-N2/M0); 5) a minimum of five years follow-up. Clinical pathological data included sex, age, tumor location, Borrmann's macroscopic tumor classification, type of gastrectomy, mortality rates, hystological type, TNM classification and staging according to UICC TNM 1997. RESULTS: Total gastrectomy was performed in 77 cases (28.1%) and subtotal gastrectomy in 197 (71.9%). The tumor was located in the upper third in 28 cases (10.2%), in the middle third in 53 (19.3%), and in the lower third in 182 (66.5%). Among patients that had their Borrmann's classification assigned, five cases (1.8%) were BI, 34 (12.4%) BII, 230 (84.0%) BIII and 16 (5.9%) BIV. Tumors were histologically classified as Laurén intestinal type in 119 cases (43.4%) and as diffuse type in 155 (56.6%). According to UICC TNM 1997 classification, early gastric cancer (T1) was diagnosed in 68 cases (24.8 %); 51 (18.6%) were T2, and 155 (56.6%) were T3. No lymph node involvement (N0) was observed in 129 cases (47.1%), whereas 100 (36.5%) were N1 (1-6 lymph nodes), and 45 (16.4%) were N2 (7-15 lymph nodes).The median number of lymph nodes dissected was 35. The overall long-term (five-year) survival rate, for stages I to IIIb was 70.4%. CONCLUSION: Digestive surgeons must be stimulated in performing D2 gastrectomies to avoid wasting the only treatment to gastric adenocarcinoma that has proven to be efficient up to this days. It must be emphasized that standardized lymph nodes dissection according to tumor location is more important that only the number of removed nodes
  • article
    Surgical outcome of Gastric Cancer in patients older than 80 years
    (2016) OLIVEIRA, Rodrigo José de; CHARRUF, Amir Zeide; JACOB, Carlos Eduardo; RAMOS, Marcus Kodama P.; DIAS, André Roncon; YAGI, Osmar K.; MUCERINO, Donato R.; BARCHI, Leandro; MESTER, Marcelo; BRESCIANI, Cláudio J. C.; LOPASSO, Fábio P.; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, Ivan
  • article
    Clinicopathologic features and surgical outcome of Gastric Stump Cancer
    (2016) OLIVEIRA, Rodrigo José de; CHARRUF, Amir Zeide; JACOB, Carlos Eduardo; DANTAS, Anna Carolina B.; RAMOS, Marcus Kodama P.; DIAS, André Roncon; YAGI, Osmar; MUCERINO, Donato; MESTER, Marcelo; BRESCIANI, Cláudio; LOPASSO, Fábio; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECONELLO, Ivan
  • article
    Morbimortality of extended local resection for advanced gastric cancer
    (2016) OLIVEIRA, Rodrigo José de; CHARRUF, Amir Zeide; JACOB, Carlos Eduardo; RAMOS, Marcus Kodama P.; DIAS, André Roncon; YAGI, Osmar K.; MUCERINO, Donato R.; BARCHI, Leandro; MESTER, Marcelo; BRESCIANI, Cláudio J. C.; LOPASSO, Fábio P.; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, Ivan
  • article
    Risk factors for lymph node metastasis after optimal surgical treatment in early gastric cancer: the western view
    (2016) ZILBERSTEIN, B; PEREIRA, MA; RAMOS, MFKP; CHARRUF, A; OLIVEIRA, RJ; FARAJ, SF; DIAS, AR; YAGI, OK; MELLO, ES; CECCONELLO, I; RIBEIRO JR, U
  • article 37 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: a 10-year experience in a high-volume university hospital
    (2018) RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; PEREIRA, Marina Alessandra; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; DIAS, Andre Roncon; CHARRUF, Amir Zeide; OLIVEIRA, Rodrigo Jose de; ZAIDAN, Evelise Pelegrinelli; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; RIBEIRO-JÚNIOR, Ulysses; CECCONELLO, Ivan
    OBJECTIVES: Surgery remains the cornerstone treatment modality for gastric cancer, the fifth most common type of tumor in Brazil. The aim of this study was to analyze the surgical treatment outcomes of patients with gastric cancer who were referred to a high-volume university hospital. METHODS: We reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent any surgical procedure due to gastric cancer from a prospectively collected database. Clinicopathological characteristics, surgical and survival outcomes were evaluated, with emphasis on patients treated with curative intent. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2017, 934 patients with gastric tumors underwent surgical procedures in our center. Gastric adenocarcinoma accounted for the majority of cases. Of the 875 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, resection with curative intent was performed in 63.5%, and palliative treatment was performed in 22.4%. The postoperative surgical mortality rate for resected cases was 5.3% and was related to D1 lymphadenectomy and the presence of comorbidities. Analysis of patients treated with curative intent showed that resection extent, pT category, pN category and final pTNM stage were related to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The DFS rates for D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy were similar, but D2 lymphadenectomy significantly improved the OS rate. Additionally, clinical factors and the presence of comorbidities had influence on the OS. CONCLUSIONS: TNM stage and the type of lymphadenectomy were independent factors related to prognosis. Early diagnosis should be sought to offer the optimal surgical approach in patients with less-advanced disease.
  • article 18 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    TOTAL OMENTECTOMY IN GASTRIC CANCER SURGERY: IS IT ALWAYS NECESSARY?
    (2019) BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; DIAS, Andre Roncon; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Ulysses; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, Ivan
    Background: Traditionally, total omentectomy is performed along with gastric resection and extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer (GC) surgery. However, solid evidences regarding its oncologic benefit is still scarce. Alm: To evaluate the incidence of metastatic omental lymph nodes (LN) in patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for GC, as well as its risk factors and patients' outcomes. Methods: All consecutive patients submitted to D2/modified D2 gastrectomy due to gastric adenocarcinoma from March 2009 to April 2016 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective collected database. Results: Of 284 patients included, five (1.8%) patients had metastatic omental LN (one: pT3N3bM0; two: pT4aN3bM0; one: pT4aN2M0 and one pT4bN3bM0). Four of them deceased and one was under palliative chemotherapy due relapse. LN metastases in the greater omentum significantly correlated with tumor's size (p=0.018), N stage (p<0.001), clinical stage (p=0.022), venous invasion growth (p=0.003), recurrence (p=0.006), site of recurrence (peritoneum: p=0.008; liver: p=0.023; ovary: p=0.035) and death (p=0.008). Conclusion: The incidence of metastatic omental LN of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy due to GC is extremely low. Total omentectomy may be avoided in tumors smaller than 5.25 cm and T1/T2 tumors. However, the presence of lymph node metastases in the greater omentum is associated with recurrence in the peritoneum, liver, ovary and death.
  • article 31 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Endoscopy vs surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer: Systematic review
    (2015) KONDO, Andre; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; MOURA, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de; BRAVO, Jose Goncalves Pereira; YAMAZAKI, Kendi; SAKAI, Paulo
    AIM: To report a systematic review, establishing the available data to an unpublished 2a strength of evidence, better handling clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, LILACS, Scopus and CINAHL databases. Information of the selected studies was extracted on characteristics of trial participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria, interventions (mainly, mucosal resection and submucosal dissection vs surgical approach) and outcomes (adverse events, different survival rates, mortality, recurrence and complete resection rates). To ascertain the validity of eligible studies, the risk of bias was measured using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The analysis of the absolute risk of the outcomes was performed using the software RevMan, by computing risk differences (RD) of dichotomous variables. Data on RD and 95% CIs for each outcome were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel test and inconsistency was qualified and reported in. 2 and the Higgins method (I 2). Sensitivity analysis was performed when heterogeneity was higher than 50%, a subsequent assay was done and other findings were compiled. RESULTS: Eleven retrospective cohort studies were selected. The included records involved 2654 patients with early gastric cancer that filled the absolute or expanded indications for endoscopic resection. Three-year survival data were available for six studies (n = 1197). There were no risk differences (RD) after endoscopic and surgical treatment (RD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.02-0.05, P = 0.51). Five-year survival data (n = 2310) showed no difference between the two groups (RD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.01-0.03, P = 0.46). Recurrence data were analized in five studies (1331 patients) and there was no difference between the approaches (RD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.00-0.02, P = 0.09). Adverse event data were identified in eight studies (n = 2439). A significant difference was detected (RD = -0.08, 95% CI: -0.10--0.05, P < 0.05), demonstrating better results with endoscopy. Mortality data were obtained in four studies (n = 1107). There was no difference between the groups (RD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02-0.00, P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Three-, 5-year survival, recurrence and mortality are similar for both groups. Considering complication, endoscopy is better and, analyzing complete resection data, it is worse than surgery.
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours' consensus guidelines for the management of gastric cancer
    (2020) PEIXOTO, Renata D'Alpino; ROCHA-FILHO, Duilio R.; WESCHENFELDER, Rui F.; REGO, Juliana F. M.; RIECHELMANN, Rachel; COUTINHO, Anelisa K.; FERNANDES, Gustavo S.; JACOME, Alexandre A.; ANDRADE, Aline C.; MURAD, Andre M.; MELLO, Celso A. L.; MIGUEL, Diego S. C. G.; GOMES, Diogo B. D.; RACY, Douglas J.; MORAES, Eduardo D.; AKAISHI, Eduardo H.; CARVALHO, Elisangela S.; MELLO, Evandro S.; MALUF FILHO, Fauze; COIMBRA, Felipe J. F.; CAPARELI, Fernanda C.; ARRUDA, Fernando F.; VIEIRA, Fernando M. A. C.; TAKEDA, Flavio R.; COTTI, Guilherme C. C.; PEREIRA, Guilherme L. S.; PAULO, Gustavo A.; RIBEIRO, Heber S. C.; LOURENCO, Laercio G.; CROSARA, Marcela; TONETO, Marcelo G.; OLIVEIRA, Marcos B.; OLIVEIRA, Maria de Lourdes; BEGNAMI, Maria Dirlei; FORONES, Nora M.; YAGI, Osmar; ASHTON-PROLLA, Patricia; AGUILLAR, Patricia B.; AMARAL, Paulo C. G.; HOFF, Paulo M.; ARAUJO, Raphael L. C.; PAULA FILHO, Raphael P. Di; GANSL, Rene C.; GIL, Roberto A.; PFIFFER, Tulio E. F.; SOUZA, Tulio; JR, Ulysses Ribeiro; JESUS, Victor Hugo F.; JR, Wilson L. Costa; PROLLA, Gabriel
    Gastric cancer is among the ten most common types of cancer worldwide. Most cases and deaths related to the disease occur in developing countries. Local socio-economic, epidemiologic and healthcare particularities led us to create a Brazilian guideline for the management of gastric carcinomas. The Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumors (GTG) invited 50 physicians with different backgrounds, including radiology, pathology, endoscopy, nuclear medicine, genetics, oncological surgery, radiotherapy and clinical oncology, to collaborate. This document was prepared based on an extensive review of topics related to heredity, diagnosis, staging, pathology, endoscopy, surgery, radiation, systemic therapy and follow-up, which was followed by presentation, discussion, and voting by the panel members. It provides updated evidence-based recommendations to guide clinical management of gastric carcinomas in several scenarios and clinical settings.