OSMAR KENJI YAGI
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
14 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 14
conferenceObject OUTCOME OF GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS SUBMITTED TO D1 LYMPH NODE DISSECTION DUE TO UNFAVORABLE MEDICAL CONDITIONS(2017) RAMOS, Marcus Kodama; PEREIRA, Marina; DIAS, Andre R.; YAGI, Osmar K.; BARCHI, Leandro C.; JACOB, Carlos E.; MUCERINO, Donato R.; LOPASSO, Fabio; MESTER, Marcelo; BRESCIANI, Claudio C.; CHARRUF, Amir Z.; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, Ivan; RIBEIRO, Ulysses- Resultados da gastrectomia D2 para o câncer gástrico: dissecção da cadeia linfática ou ressecção linfonodal múltipla?(2012) ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; MUCERINO, Donato Roberto; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Ulysses; LOPASSO, Fabio Pinatel; BRESCIANI, Claudio; JACOB, Carlos Eduardo; COIMBRA, Brian Guilherme Monteiro Marta; CECCONELLO, IvanBACKGROUND: Eastern literature is remarkable for presenting survival rates for surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma superior to those presented in western countries. AIM: To analyze the long-term result after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: Two hundred seventy four underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection as exclusive treatment. The inclusion criteria were: 1) lymph node removal according to Japanese standardized lymphatic chain dissection; 2) potentially curative surgery described in medical records as D2 or more lymph node dissection; 3) tumoral invasiveness of gastric wall restricted to the organ (T1 - T3); 4) absence of distant metastasis (N0-N2/M0); 5) a minimum of five years follow-up. Clinical pathological data included sex, age, tumor location, Borrmann's macroscopic tumor classification, type of gastrectomy, mortality rates, hystological type, TNM classification and staging according to UICC TNM 1997. RESULTS: Total gastrectomy was performed in 77 cases (28.1%) and subtotal gastrectomy in 197 (71.9%). The tumor was located in the upper third in 28 cases (10.2%), in the middle third in 53 (19.3%), and in the lower third in 182 (66.5%). Among patients that had their Borrmann's classification assigned, five cases (1.8%) were BI, 34 (12.4%) BII, 230 (84.0%) BIII and 16 (5.9%) BIV. Tumors were histologically classified as Laurén intestinal type in 119 cases (43.4%) and as diffuse type in 155 (56.6%). According to UICC TNM 1997 classification, early gastric cancer (T1) was diagnosed in 68 cases (24.8 %); 51 (18.6%) were T2, and 155 (56.6%) were T3. No lymph node involvement (N0) was observed in 129 cases (47.1%), whereas 100 (36.5%) were N1 (1-6 lymph nodes), and 45 (16.4%) were N2 (7-15 lymph nodes).The median number of lymph nodes dissected was 35. The overall long-term (five-year) survival rate, for stages I to IIIb was 70.4%. CONCLUSION: Digestive surgeons must be stimulated in performing D2 gastrectomies to avoid wasting the only treatment to gastric adenocarcinoma that has proven to be efficient up to this days. It must be emphasized that standardized lymph nodes dissection according to tumor location is more important that only the number of removed nodes
- Short-Term Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy Compared to Open Gastrectomy for Patients with Gastric Cancer: a Randomized Trial(2022) RIBEIRO, Ulysses; DIAS, Andre Roncon; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; OLIVEIRA, Rodrigo Jose; PEREIRA, Marina Alessandra; ABDALLA, Ricardo Zugaib; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; NAHAS, Sergio Carlos; CECCONELLO, IvanBackground Robotic gastrectomy (RG) has been shown to be a safe and feasible method in gastric cancer (GC) treatment. However, most studies are in Eastern cohorts and there is great interest in knowing whether the method can be used routinely, especially in the West. Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical outcomes of D2-gastrectomy by RG versus open gastrectomy (OG). Methods Single-institution, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial performed between 2015 and 2020. GC patients were randomized (1:1 allocation) to surgical treatment by RG or OG. Da Vinci Si platform was used. Inclusion criteria: gastric adenocarcinoma, stage cT2-4 cNO-1, potentially curative surgery, age 18-80 years, and ECOG performance status 0-1. Exclusion criteria: emergency surgery and previous gastric or major abdominal surgery. Primary endpoint was short-term surgical outcomes. The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02292914). Results Of 65 randomized patients, 5 were excluded (3 palliatives, 1 obstruction and emergency surgery, and 1 for material shortage). Consequently, 31 and 29 patients were included for final analysis in the OG and RG groups, respectively. No differences were observed between groups regarding age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, ASA, and frequency of total gastrectomy. RG had similar mean number of harvested lymph nodes (p = 0.805), longer surgical time (p < 0.001), and less bleeding (p <0.001) compared to OG. Postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and readmissions in 30 days were equivalent between OG and RG. Conclusions RG reduces operative bleeding by more than 50%. The short-term outcomes were non-inferior to OG, although surgical time was longer in RG.
conferenceObject RISK FACTORS FOR LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN WESTERN EARLY GASTRIC CANCER AFTER OPTIMAL SURGICAL TREATMENT(2017) RAMOS, Marcus Kodama; PEREIRA, Marina; DIAS, Andre R.; YAGI, Osmar K.; FARAJ, Sheila F.; SAFATLE-RIBEIRO, Adriana V.; MELO, Evandro Sobroza de; MALUF-FILHO, Fauze; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, Ivan; RIBEIRO, UlyssesconferenceObject PREDICTORS OF PATHOLOGICAL TUMOR RESPONSE IN GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS AFTER NEOADJUVANT THERAPY(2017) RAMOS, Marcus Kodama; PEREIRA, Marina; CHARRUF, Amir Z.; DIAS, Andre R.; YAGI, Osmar K.; FARAJ, Sheila F.; PEREIRA, Guilherme L.; MELO, Evandro Sobroza de; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, Ivan; RIBEIRO, Ulysses- TOTAL OMENTECTOMY IN GASTRIC CANCER SURGERY: IS IT ALWAYS NECESSARY?(2019) BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; DIAS, Andre Roncon; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Ulysses; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, IvanBackground: Traditionally, total omentectomy is performed along with gastric resection and extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer (GC) surgery. However, solid evidences regarding its oncologic benefit is still scarce. Alm: To evaluate the incidence of metastatic omental lymph nodes (LN) in patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for GC, as well as its risk factors and patients' outcomes. Methods: All consecutive patients submitted to D2/modified D2 gastrectomy due to gastric adenocarcinoma from March 2009 to April 2016 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective collected database. Results: Of 284 patients included, five (1.8%) patients had metastatic omental LN (one: pT3N3bM0; two: pT4aN3bM0; one: pT4aN2M0 and one pT4bN3bM0). Four of them deceased and one was under palliative chemotherapy due relapse. LN metastases in the greater omentum significantly correlated with tumor's size (p=0.018), N stage (p<0.001), clinical stage (p=0.022), venous invasion growth (p=0.003), recurrence (p=0.006), site of recurrence (peritoneum: p=0.008; liver: p=0.023; ovary: p=0.035) and death (p=0.008). Conclusion: The incidence of metastatic omental LN of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy due to GC is extremely low. Total omentectomy may be avoided in tumors smaller than 5.25 cm and T1/T2 tumors. However, the presence of lymph node metastases in the greater omentum is associated with recurrence in the peritoneum, liver, ovary and death.
- Endoscopy vs surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer: Systematic review(2015) KONDO, Andre; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; MOURA, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de; BRAVO, Jose Goncalves Pereira; YAMAZAKI, Kendi; SAKAI, PauloAIM: To report a systematic review, establishing the available data to an unpublished 2a strength of evidence, better handling clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, LILACS, Scopus and CINAHL databases. Information of the selected studies was extracted on characteristics of trial participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria, interventions (mainly, mucosal resection and submucosal dissection vs surgical approach) and outcomes (adverse events, different survival rates, mortality, recurrence and complete resection rates). To ascertain the validity of eligible studies, the risk of bias was measured using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The analysis of the absolute risk of the outcomes was performed using the software RevMan, by computing risk differences (RD) of dichotomous variables. Data on RD and 95% CIs for each outcome were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel test and inconsistency was qualified and reported in. 2 and the Higgins method (I 2). Sensitivity analysis was performed when heterogeneity was higher than 50%, a subsequent assay was done and other findings were compiled. RESULTS: Eleven retrospective cohort studies were selected. The included records involved 2654 patients with early gastric cancer that filled the absolute or expanded indications for endoscopic resection. Three-year survival data were available for six studies (n = 1197). There were no risk differences (RD) after endoscopic and surgical treatment (RD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.02-0.05, P = 0.51). Five-year survival data (n = 2310) showed no difference between the two groups (RD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.01-0.03, P = 0.46). Recurrence data were analized in five studies (1331 patients) and there was no difference between the approaches (RD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.00-0.02, P = 0.09). Adverse event data were identified in eight studies (n = 2439). A significant difference was detected (RD = -0.08, 95% CI: -0.10--0.05, P < 0.05), demonstrating better results with endoscopy. Mortality data were obtained in four studies (n = 1107). There was no difference between the groups (RD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02-0.00, P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Three-, 5-year survival, recurrence and mortality are similar for both groups. Considering complication, endoscopy is better and, analyzing complete resection data, it is worse than surgery.
conferenceObject Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Value of Epstein-Barr Virus-associated Gastric Cancer, Microsatellite Instability and PD-L1 Immunoexpression(2017) PEREIRA, Marina Alessandra; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; DIAS, Andre Roncon; FARAJ, Sheila Friedrich; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, Ivan; MELLO, Evandro Sobroza de; RIBEIRO JR., UlyssesconferenceObject SHORT-TERM SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF ROBOTIC GASTRECTOMY COMPARED TO OPEN GASTRECTOMY FOR PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC CANCER: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL(2022) RIBEIRO, Ulysses; DIAS, Andre Roncon; RAMOS, Marcus F.; YAGI, Osmar K.; OLIVEIRA, Rodrigo J. De; ABDALLA, Ricardo Z.; PEREIRA, Marina A.; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; NAHAS, Sergio C.; CECCONELLO, Ivan- Simplified technique for reconstruction of the digestive tract after total and subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer(2014) ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; JACOB, Carlos Eduardo; BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; RIBEIRO-JR, Ulysses; COIMBRA, Brian Guilherme Monteiro Marta; CECCONELLO, IvanBACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has been increasingly applied to gastric cancer surgery. Gastrointestinal tract reconstruction totally done by laparoscopy also has been a challenge for those who developed this procedure. AIM - To describe simplified reconstruction after total or subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer by laparoscopy and the results of its application in a series of cases. METHODS - In the last four years, 75 patients were operated with gastric cancer and two with GIST. Thirty-four were women and 43 men. The age ranged from 38 to 77 years with an average of 55 years. In two patients with GIST a total and a subtotal gastrectomy were performed. In the other 75 patients were done 21 total gastrectomies and 54 subtotal. In all cancers, gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was completed with at least 37 lymph nodes removed. Was used in these operations a modified laparoscopic technique proposed by the authors consisting in a latero lateral esophagojejunal anastomosis with linear stapler in TG as well in STG, and reconstruction of the digestive continuity also in the upper abdomen. RESULTS - The intraoperative and immediate postoperative course were uneventful, except for one case of bleeding due to an opening clip, necessitating re-intervention. The operative time was 300 minutes, with no difference between total or subtotal gastrectomy. The number of lymph nodes removed varied from 28 to 69, averaging 37. Postoperative staging showed one case in T4 N2 M0; 13 in T2 N0 MO; 27 in T2 N1 M0; 24 in T3 N1 M0 and 10 in T3 N2 M0. Complication in only one case was observed on the 10th postoperative day with a small anastomotic leakage in esophagojejunal anastomose with spontaneous closure. CONCLUSION - The patient's evolution with no complications, no mortality and just one small anastomotic leakage with no systemic repercussions is a strong indication of the liability and feasibility of this innovative technical method.