AMANDA CARDOSO MONTAL
Índice h a partir de 2011
5
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
PAHC, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
FMUSP, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
FMUSP, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
2 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Reinfection rate in a cohort of healthcare workers over 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic(2023) GUEDES, Ana Rubia; OLIVEIRA, Maura S. S.; TAVARES, Bruno M. M.; LUNA-MUSCHI, Alessandra; LAZARI, Carolina dos Santos; MONTAL, Amanda C. C.; FARIA, Elizabeth de; MAIA, Fernando Liebhart; BARBOZA, Antonio dos Santos; LEME, Mariana Deckers; TOMAZINI, Francis M. M.; COSTA, Silvia Figueiredo; LEVIN, Anna S. S.In this large cohort of healthcare workers, we aimed to estimate the rate of reinfections by SARS-CoV-2 over 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated the proportion of reinfections among all the cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 10, 2020 until March 10, 2022. Reinfection was defined as the appearance of new symptoms that on medical evaluation were suggestive of COVID-19 and confirmed by a positive RT-PCR. Symptoms had to occur more than 90 days after the previous infection. These 2 years were divided into time periods based on the different variants of concern (VOC) in the city of Sao Paulo. There were 37,729 medical consultations due to COVID-19 at the hospital's Health Workers Services; and 25,750 RT-PCR assays were performed, of which 23% (n = 5865) were positive. Reinfection by SARS-CoV-2 was identified in 5% (n = 284) of symptomatic cases. Most cases of reinfection occurred during the Omicron period (n = 251; 88%), representing a significant increase on the SARS-CoV-2 reinfection rate before and during the Omicron variant period (0.8% vs. 4.3%; p < 0.001). The mean interval between SARS-CoV-2 infections was 429 days (ranged from 122 to 674). The Omicron variant spread faster than Gamma and Delta variant. All SARS-CoV-2 reinfections were mild cases.
- Decontamination and re-use of surgical masks and respirators during the COVID-19 pandemic(2021) CORTES, Marina Farrel; ESPINOZA, Evelyn Patricia Sanchez; NOGUERA, Saidy Liceth Vasconez; SILVA, Aline Alves; MEDEIROS, Marion Elke Sielfeld Araya de; BOAS, Lucy Santos Villas; FERREIRA, Noely Evangelista; TOZETTO-MENDOZA, Tania Regina; MORAIS, Fernando Goncalves; QUEIROZ, Rayana Santiago de; PROENCA, Adriana Coracini Tonacio de; GUIMARAES, Thais; GUEDES, Ana Rubia; LETAIF, Leila Suemi Harima; MONTAL, Amanda Cardoso; MENDES-CORREA, Maria Cassia; JOHN, Vanderley M.; LEVIN, Anna S.; COSTA, Silvia FigueiredoObjectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic increased global demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) and resulted in shortages. The study evaluated the re-use of surgical masks and respirators by analysing their performance and safety before and after reprocessing using the following methods: oven, thermal drying, autoclave, and hydrogen peroxide plasma vapour. Methods: In total, 45 surgical masks and 69 respirators were decontaminated. Visual integrity, air permeability, burst resistance, pressure differential and particulate filtration efficiency of new and decontaminated surgical masks and respirators were evaluated. In addition, 14 used respirators were analysed after work shifts before and after decontamination using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viral culturing. Finally, reprocessed respirators were evaluated by users in terms of functionality and comfort. Results: Oven decontamination (75 degrees C for 45 min) was found to be the simplest decontamination method. Physical and filtration assays indicated that all reprocessing methods were safe after one cycle. Oven decontamination maintained the characteristics of surgical masks and respirators for at least five reprocessing cycles. Viral RNA was detected by RT-PCR in two of the 14 used respirators. Four respirators submitted to viral culture were PCR-negative and culture-negative. Reprocessed respirators used in work shifts were evaluated positively by users, even after three decontamination cycles. Conclusion: Oven decontamination is a safe method for reprocessing surgical masks and respirators for at least five cycles, and is feasible in the hospital setting. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.