MAX SENNA MANO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
16
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/24 - Laboratório de Oncologia Experimental, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
  • article 23 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Effects of locoregional radiotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    (2016) MAURO, Geovanne Pedro; CARVALHO, Heloisa de Andrade; STUART, Silva Radwanski; MANO, Max Senna; MARTA, Gustavo Nader
    Objectives: This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who underwent local radiation therapy (RT) for the primary site. Material and methods: Between 2005 and 2013, we retrospectively evaluated patients with MBC who received breast or chest wall RT with or without regional lymph node irradiation. Results: 2761 patients with breast cancer were treated with RT. Of them, 125 women with stage IV breast carcinoma were included. The median follow-up was 15 months (ranging from 3.8 to 168 months), when 54.7% of the patients had died; local progression was observed in 22.8% of the patients. The mean overall survival (OS) and local progression free survival (LoPFS) were 23.4 +/- 2.4 months and 45.1 +/- 2.9 months, respectively. Three-and five-year overall survival rates were, respectively, 21.2% and 13.3%. Local progression free survival was the same, 67.3%, at three and five years, respectively. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p = 0.015), number of metastatic sites (p = 0.031), RT dose (p = 0.0001) and hormone therapy (p = 0.0001) were confirmed as independent significant variables correlated with OS. The variables that were independently correlated with LoPFS were the number of previous chemotherapy lines (p = 0.038) and RT dose (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: RT of the primary site in patients with MBC is well tolerated. The factors that presented positive impact on survival were good KPS, low disease burden (1-3 metastatic sites), and the use of hormone therapy.
  • article 21 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Biological therapies in breast cancer: Common toxicities and management strategies
    (2013) BARROSO-SOUSA, Romualdo; SANTANA, Iuri A.; TESTA, Laura; GAGLIATO, Debora de Melo; MANO, Max S.
    In recent years, a number of new molecules e commonly known as biological therapies e have been approved or are in late stages of regulatory evaluation for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. These innovative compounds have improved treatment efficacy and have probably contributed to the increase in survival length observed in some breast cancer subtypes. However, these agents are not deprived of toxicity, which can impair quality of life and may occasionally be life-threatening. In this article, we reviewed the most common toxicities associated with these drugs and provided a number of practical recommendations on their optimal clinical management.
  • article 21 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Clinical impact of adjuvant radiation therapy delay after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer
    (2018) SILVA, Saulo Brito; PEREIRA, Allan Andresson Lima; MARTA, Gustavo Nader; LIMA, Kennya Medeiros Lopes de Barros; FREITAS, Thiago Brasileiro de; MATUTINO, Adriana Reis Brandao; SOUZA, Manoel Carlos Leonardi de Azevedo; AZEVEDO, Renata Gondim Meira Velame de; VIVEIROS, Pedro Antonio Hermida de; LIMA, Julianne Maria da Silva; FILASSI, Jose Roberto; CARVALHO, Heloisa de Andrade; PIATO, Jose Roberto Morales; MANO, Max S.
    Background: and Purpose: Post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) is usually indicated for patients with breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery. However, the optimal timing to initiation of PORT is currently unknown. Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated data from patients with BC who received PORT after NAC and surgery at our institution from 2008 to 2014. Patients were categorized into three groups according to the time between surgery and PORT: < 8 weeks, 8-16 weeks and > 16 weeks. Results: A total of 581 patients were included; 74% had clinical stage III. Forty-three patients started PORT within 8 weeks, 354 between 8 and 16 weeks and 184 beyond 16 weeks from surgery. With a median follow-up of 32 months, initiation of PORT up to 8 weeks after surgery was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) (< 8 weeks versus 8-16 weeks: HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.81; p = 0.02; < 8 weeks versus > 16 weeks: HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.96; p = 0.04) and better overall survival (OS) (< 8 weeks versus 8-16 weeks: HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.90; p = 0.036; < 8 weeks versus > 16 weeks: HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.07-1.15; p = 0.08). Conclusion: PORT started up to 8 weeks after surgery was associated with better DFS and OS in locally-advanced BC patients submitted to NAC. Our findings suggest that early initiation of PORT is critically important for these patients. However, the low numbers of patients and events in this study prevent us from drawing firm conclusions.