JOAQUIM MAURICIO DA MOTTA LEAL FILHO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
10
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • article 1 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Cost-effectiveness of selective internal radiation therapy with Y-90 resin microspheres for intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in Brazil
    (2023) AGIRREZABAL, Ion; GRILLO JUNIOR, Luiz Sergio Pereira; NASSER, Felipe; BRENNAN, Victoria K.; BUGANO, Diogo; GALASTRI, Francisco Leonardo; AZEREDO-DA-SILVA, Andre Luis F. de; SHERGILL, Suki; MOTTA-LEAL-FILHO, Joaquim Mauricio da
    Aims Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a severe condition with poor prognosis that places a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a treatment available to patients with HCC which addresses some of the limitations of alternative treatment options. A cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken into the use of SIRT using Y-90 resin microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intermediate- and late-stage HCC in Brazil. Materials and methods A partitioned-survival model was developed, including a tunnel state for patients downstaged to receive treatments with curative intent. Sorafenib was the selected comparator, a common systemic treatment in Brazil and for which comparative evidence exists. Clinical data were extracted from published sources of pivotal trials, and effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-years (LYs). The analysis was conducted from the Brazilian private payer perspective and a lifetime horizon was implemented. Comprehensive sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results LYs and QALYs were higher for SIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres versus sorafenib (0.27 and 0.20 incremental LYs and QALYs, respectively) and costs were slightly higher for SIRT (R$15,864). The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was R$77,602 per QALY. The ICER was mostly influenced by parameters defining the sorafenib overall survival curve and SIRT had a 73% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of R$135,761 per QALY (3-times the per-capita gross domestic product in Brazil). Overall, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results indicating that SIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres is cost-effective compared with sorafenib. Limitations A rapidly evolving treatment landscape in Brazil and worldwide, and the lack of local data for some variables were the main limitations. Conclusions SIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres is a cost-effective option compared with sorafenib in Brazil.