MARCO ANTONIO SCANAVINI FILHO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
2
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/11 - Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Revista / Livro: Advances in Therapy ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Effects of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel on Coronary Microcirculation in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
    (2022) SCANAVINI-FILHO, Marco Antonio; BERWANGER, Otavio; MATTHIAS, Wilson; AGUIAR, Miguel O.; CHIANG, Hsu P.; AZEVEDO, Luciene; BARACIOLI, Luciano M.; LIMA, Felipe G.; FURTADO, Remo H. M.; DALCOQUIO, Talia F.; MENEZES, Fernando R.; FERRARI, Aline G.; LUCA, Fabio de; GIUGLIANO, Robert P.; GOODMAN, Shaun; NICOLAU, Jose C.
    Introduction Clopidogrel has been demonstrated to be effective in improving coronary microcirculation (CM) among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytics. Ticagrelor is a more potent adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor blocker proven to be superior to clopidogrel among patients with acute coronary syndromes. The present study aimed to compare the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on CM in patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolytics. Methods The present study prospectively included 48 patients participating in the TREAT trial, which randomly assigned patients with STEMI undergoing fibrinolysis to ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. The primary endpoint of this study was the evaluation of the CM using the global myocardial perfusion score index (global MPSI) obtained by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). Platelet aggregation to ADP was evaluated by Multiplate (R) and expressed as area under the curve (AUC). Results The global MPSI demonstrated no differences between the groups [mean 1.4 (1.2-1.5) in the ticagrelor group and 1.2 (1.2-1.5) in the clopidogrel group (p = 0.41)]. Platelet aggregability was lower in the ticagrelor group (18.1 +/- 9.7 AUC), compared to the clopidogrel group (26.1 +/- 12.5 AUC, p = 0.01). Conclusion We found no improvement in coronary microcirculation with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel among patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolytics, despite the fact that platelet aggregation to ADP was lower with ticagrelor.