MARCO ANTONIO SCANAVINI FILHO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
2
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/11 - Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Effects of DPP4 Inhibitor in Platelet Reactivity and Other Cardiac Risk Markers in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Myocardial Infarction
    (2022) GENESTRETI, Paulo R. Rizzo; FURTADO, Remo H. M.; SALSOSO, Rocio; DALCOQUIO, Talia F.; FRANCI, Andre; MENEZES, Fernando R.; CAPORRINO, Cesar; FERRARI, Aline G.; NAKASHIMA, Carlos A. K.; SCANAVINI FILHO, Marco A.; LIMA, Felipe G.; V, Roberto R. C. Giraldez; BARACIOLI, Luciano M.; NICOLAU, Jose C.
    Background: The management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presents several challenges in patients with diabetes, among them the higher rate of recurrent thrombotic events, hyperglycemia and risk of subsequent heart failure (HF). The objective of our study was to evaluate effects of DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) on platelet reactivity (main objective) and cardiac risk markers. Methods: We performed a single-center double-blind randomized trial. A total of 70 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with AMI Killip <= 2 on dual-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) were randomized to receive sitagliptin 100 mg or saxagliptin 5 mg daily or matching placebo. Platelet reactivity was assessed at baseline, 4 days (primary endpoint) and 30 days (secondary endpoint) after randomization, using VerifyNow Aspirin (TM) assay, expressed as aspirin reaction units (ARUs); B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in pg/mL was assessed at baseline and 30 days after (secondary endpoint). Results: Mean age was 62.6 +/- 8.8 years, 45 (64.3%) male, and 52 (74.3%) of patients presented with ST-segment elevation MI. For primary endpoint, there were no differences in mean platelet reactivity (p = 0.51) between the DPP-4i (8.00 {-65.00; 63.00}) and placebo (-14.00 {-77.00; 52.00}) groups, as well in mean BNP levels (p = 0.14) between DPP-4i (-36.00 {-110.00; 15.00}) and placebo (-13.00 {-50.00; 27.00}). There was no difference between groups in cardiac adverse events. Conclusions: DPP4 inhibitor did not reduce platelet aggregation among patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized with AMI. Moreover, the use of DPP-4i did not show an increase in BNP levels or in the incidence of cardiac adverse events. These findings suggests that DPP-4i could be an option for management of T2DM patients with acute MI.
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Complete Treatment Versus Residual Lesion - Long-Term Evolution After Acute Coronary Syndrome
    (2016) SOEIRO, Alexandre de Matos; SCANAVINI FILHO, Marco Antonio; BOSSA, Aline Siqueira; ZULLINO, Cindel Nogueira; SOEIRO, Maria Carolina F. Almeida; LEAL, Tatiana Carvalho Andreucci T.; SERRANO JR., Carlos Vicente; HAJJAR, Ludhmila Abrahao; KALIL FILHO, Roberto; OLIVEIRA JR., Mucio Tavares
    Introduction: A recently published study raised doubts about the need for percutaneous treatment of nonculprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods: Retrospective, unicentric, observational study. Objective: To analyze the long-term outcomes in patients undergoing treatment of the culprit artery, comparing those who remained with significant residual lesions in nonculprit arteries (group I) versus those without residual lesions in other coronary artery beds (group II). The study included 580 patients (284 in group I and 296 in group II) between May 2010 and May 2013. We obtained demographic and clinical data, as well as information regarding the coronary treatment administered to the patients. In the statistical analysis, the primary outcome included combined events (reinfarction/ angina, death, heart failure, and need for reintervention). The comparison between groups was performed using the chisquare test and ANOVA. The long-term analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method, with a mean follow-up of 9.86 months. Results: The mean ages were 63 years in group I and 62 years in group II. On long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in combined events in groups I and II (31.9% versus 35.6%, respectively, p=0.76). Conclusion: The strategy of treating the culprit artery alone seems safe. In this study, no long-term differences in combined endpoints were observed between patients who remained with significant lesions compared with those without other obstructions.