AIRTON MOTA MOREIRA

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
15
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 190 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) Versus Original and PErFecTED Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): Preliminary Results of a Single Center, Prospective, Urodynamic-Controlled Analysis
    (2016) CARNEVALE, Francisco C.; ISCAIFE, Alexandre; YOSHINAGA, Eduardo M.; MOREIRA, Airton Mota; ANTUNES, Alberto A.; SROUGI, Miguel
    To compare clinical and urodynamic results of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to original and PErFecTED prostate artery embolization (PAE) methods for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We prospectively randomized 30 patients to receive TURP or original PAE (oPAE) and compared them to a cohort of patients treated by PErFecTED PAE, with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Patients were assessed for urodynamic parameters, prostate volume, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and quality of life (QoL). All groups were comparable for all pre-treatment parameters except bladder contractility and peak urine flow rate (Q (max)), both of which were significantly better in the TURP group, and IIEF score, which was significantly higher among PErFecTED PAE patients than TURP patients. All groups experienced significant improvement in IPSS, QoL, prostate volume, and Q (max). TURP and PErFecTED PAE both resulted in significantly lower IPSS than oPAE but were not significantly different from one another. TURP resulted in significantly higher Q (max) and significantly smaller prostate volume than either original or PErFecTED PAE but required spinal anesthesia and hospitalization. Two patients in the oPAE group with hypocontractile bladders experienced recurrence of symptoms and were treated with TURP. In the TURP group, urinary incontinence occurred in 4/15 patients (26.7 %), rupture of the prostatic capsule in 1/15 (6.7 %), retrograde ejaculation in all patients (100 %), and one patient was readmitted for temporary bladder irrigation due to hematuria. TURP and PAE are both safe and effective treatments. TURP and PErFecTED PAE yield similar symptom improvement, but TURP is associated with both better urodynamic results and more adverse events.
  • article 66 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Comparative Study Using 100-300 Versus 300-500 mu m Microspheres for Symptomatic Patients Due to Enlarged-BPH Prostates
    (2016) GONCALVES, Octavio Meneghelli; CARNEVALE, Francisco Cesar; MOREIRA, Airton Mota; ANTUNES, Alberto Azoubel; RODRIGUES, Vanessa Cristina; SROUGI, Miguel
    The purpose of the study was to compare safety and efficacy outcomes following prostate artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with 100-300 versus 300-500 mu m tris-acryl gelatin microspheres. Patients were prospectively treated between August 2011 and June 2013 to receive PAE with 100-300 mu m (group A) or 300-500 mu m (group B) tris-acryl gelatin microspheres. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months and were assessed for changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) index, prostate volume determined by magnetic resonance imaging, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), and maximum urine flow rate (Q(max)), as well as any treatment-related adverse events. Fifteen patients were included in each group, and PAE was technically successful in all cases. Both groups experienced significant improvement in mean IPSS, QoL, prostate volume, PSA, and Q(max) (p < 0.05 for all). The differences observed between the two groups included a marginally insignificant more adverse events (p = 0.066) and greater mean serum PSA reduction at 3 months of follow-up (p = 0.056) in group A. Both 100-300 and 300-500 mu m microspheres are safe and effective embolic agents for PAE to treat LUTS-related to BPH. Although functional and imaging outcomes did not differ significantly following use of the two embolic sizes, the greater incidence of adverse events with 100-300 mu m microspheres suggests that 300-500 mu m embolic materials may be more appropriate.