SILVIA VIDAL CAMPOS
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/09 - Laboratório de Pneumologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/09 - Laboratório de Pneumologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
4 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
article 4 Citação(ões) na Scopus Prevalence and factors associated with darunavir resistance mutations in multi-experienced HIV-1-infected patients failing other protease inhibitors in a referral teaching center in Brazil(2011) VIDAL, Jose E.; FREITAS, Angela C.; SONG, Alice T. W.; CAMPOS, Silvia V.; DALBEN, Mirian; HERNANDEZ, Adrian V.Information about resistance profile of darunavir (DRV) is scarce in Brazil. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of DRV resistance mutations in patients failing protease inhibitors (PI) and to identify factors associated with having more DRV resistance mutations. All HIV-infected patients failing PI-based regimens with genotyping performed between 2007 and 2008 in a referral teaching center in Sao Paulo, Brazil, were included. DRV-specific resistance mutations listed by December 2008 IAS-USA panel update were considered. Two Poisson regression models were constructed to assess factors related to the presence of more DRV resistance mutations. A total of 171 HIV-infected patients with available genotyping were included. The number of patients with lopinavir, saquinavir, and amprenavir used in previous regimen were 130 (76%), 83 (49%), and 35 (20%), respectively. The prevalence of major DRV resistance mutations was 50V: 5%; 54M: 1%; 76V: 4%; 84V: 15%. For minor mutations, the rates were 11I: 3%; 32I: 7%; 33F: 23%; 47V: 6%; 54L: 6%; 74P: 3%; 89V: 6%. Only 11 (6%) of the genotypes had >= 3 DRV resistance mutations. In the clinical model, time of HIV infection of > 10 years and use of amprenavir were independently associated with having more DRV resistance mutations. In the genotyping-based model, only total number of PI resistance mutations was associated with our outcome. In conclusion, the prevalence of DRV mutations was low. Time of HIV infection, use of amprenavir and total number of PI resistance mutations were associated with having more DRV mutations.- The Zika epidemics and transplantation(2016) SILVEIRA, Fernantla P.; CAMPOS, Silvia V.In the last few months an epidemic of Zika virus (ZIKV) has affected several countries, and it continues to spread rapidly. This virus was initially thought to cause only a mild febrile illness; however, the current epidemic has shown that it is associated with serious complications. Increasing reports are linking ZIKV to devastating conditions such as microcephaly in newborns and important neurologic syndromes. Although ZIKV infection has not yet been reported in transplant recipients, it is likely that it will be reported soon because of the number of transplants performed in affected areas and global travel. We discuss the effect of ZIKV in transplantation and propose recommendations to prevent donor derived infections.
- Predictors of mortality in solid organ transplant recipients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: The impact of cytomegalovirus disease and lymphopenia(2020) PEREZ-NADALES, Elena; GUTIERREZ-GUTIERREZ, Belen; NATERA, Alejandra M.; ABDALA, Edson; MAGALHAES, Maira Reina; MULARONI, Alessandra; MONACO, Francesco; PIERROTTI, Ligia Camera; FREIRE, Maristela Pinheiro; IYER, Ranganathan N.; STEINKE, Seema Mehta; CALVI, Elisa Grazia; TUMBARELLO, Mario; FALCONE, Marco; FERNANDEZ-RUIZ, Mario; COSTA-MATEO, Jose Maria; RANA, Meenakshi M.; STRABELLI, Tania Mara Varejao; PAUL, Mical; FARINAS, Maria Carmen; CLEMENTE, Wanessa Trindade; ROILIDES, Emmanuel; MUNOZ, Patricia; DEWISPELAERE, Laurent; LOECHES, Belen; LOWMAN, Warren; TAN, Ban Hock; ESCUDERO-SANCHEZ, Rosa; BODRO, Marta; GROSSI, Paolo Antonio; SOLDANI, Fabio; GUNSEREN, Filiz; NESTOROVA, Nina; PASCUAL, Alvaro; MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ, Luis; AGUADO, Jose Maria; RODRIGUEZ-BANO, Jesus; TORRE-CISNEROS, Julian; SONG, A. T. Wan; ANDRAUS, W.; D'ALBUQUERQUE, L. A. Carneiro; DAVID-NETO, E.; PAULA, F. Jota de; ROSSI, F.; OSTRANDER, D.; AVERY, R.; RIZZI, M.; LOSITO, A. R.; RAFFAELLI, F.; GIACOMO, P. Del; TISEO, G.; LORA-TAMAYO, J.; SAN-JUAN, R.; GRACIA-AHUFINGER, I; CASTON, J.; RUIZ, Y. A.; ALTMAN, D. R.; V, S. Campos; BAR-SINAI, N.; KOPPEL, F.; ALMAJANO, F. Arnaiz de las Revillas; RICO, C. Gonzalez; MARTINEZ, M. Fernandez; MOURAO, P. H. O.; NEVES, F. A.; FERREIRA, J.; PYRPASOPOULOU, A.; IOSIFIDIS, E.; ROMIOPOULOS, I; V, M. Minero; SANCHEZ-CARRILLO, C.; LARDO, S.; COUSSEMENT, J.; DODEMONT, M.; JIAYUN, K.; MARTIN-DAVILA, P.; FORTUN, J.; ALMELA, M.; MORENO, A.; LINARES, L.; GASPERINA, D. D.; BALSAMO, M. L.; ROVELLI, C.; CONCIA, E.; CHIESI, S.; SALERNO, D. N.; OGUNC, D.; PILMIS, B.; SEMINARI, E. M.; CARRATALA, J.; DOMINGUEZ, A.; CORDERO, E.; LEPE, J. A.; MONTEJO, M.; LUCAS, E. Merino de; ERIKSSON, B. M.; DELDEN, C. van; MANUEL, O.; ARSLAN, H.; TUFAN, Z. Kocak; KAZAK, E.; DAVID, M.; LEASE, E.; CORNAGLIA, G.; AKOVA, M.Treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections in solid organ transplant recipients is challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a specific score to predict mortality in solid organ transplant recipients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections. A multinational, retrospective (2004-2016) cohort study (INCREMENT-SOT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02852902) was performed. The main outcome variable was 30-day all-cause mortality. The INCREMENT-SOT-CPE score was developed using logistic regression. The global cohort included 216 patients. The final logistic regression model included the following variables: INCREMENT-CPE mortality score >= 8 (8 points), no source control (3 points), inappropriate empirical therapy (2 points), cytomegalovirus disease (7 points), lymphopenia (4 points), and the interaction between INCREMENT-CPE score >= 8 and CMV disease (minus 7 points). This score showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.88) and classified patients into 3 strata: 0-7 (low mortality), 8-11 (high mortality), and 12-17 (very-high mortality). We performed a stratified analysis of the effect of monotherapy vs combination therapy among 165 patients who received appropriate therapy. Monotherapy was associated with higher mortality only in the very-high (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.82, 95% CI 1.13-7.06, P = .03) and high (HR 9.93, 95% CI 2.08-47.40, P = .004) mortality risk strata. A score-based algorithm is provided for therapy guidance.
- Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation(2021) LEARD, Lorriana E.; HOLM, Are M.; VALAPOUR, Maryam; GLANVILLE, Allan R.; ATTAWAR, Sandeep; AVERSA, Meghan; V, Silvia Campos; CHRISTON, Lillian M.; CYPEL, Marcelo; DELLGREN, Goran; HARTWIG, Matthew G.; KAPNADAK, Siddhartha G.; KOLAITIS, Nicholas A.; KOTLOFF, Robert M.; PATTERSON, Caroline M.; SHLOBIN, Oksana A.; SMITH, Patrick J.; SOLE, Amparo; SOLOMON, Melinda; WEILL, David; WIJSENBEEK, Marlies S.; WILLEMSE, Brigitte W. M.; ARCASOY, Selim M.; RAMOS, Kathleen J.Tens of thousands of patients with advanced lung diseases may be eligible to be considered as potential candidates for lung transplant around the world each year. The timing of referral, evaluation, determination of candidacy, and listing of candidates continues to pose challenges and even ethical dilemmas. To address these challenges, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation appointed an international group of members to review the literature, to consider recent advances in the management of advanced lung diseases, and to update prior consensus documents on the selection of lung transplant candidates. The purpose of this updated consensus document is to assist providers throughout the world who are caring for patients with pulmonary disease to identify potential candidates for lung transplant, to optimize the timing of the referral of these patients to lung transplant centers, and to provide transplant centers with a framework for evaluating and selecting candidates. In addition to addressing general considerations and providing disease specific recommendations for referral and listing, this updated consensus document includes an ethical framework, a recognition of the variability in acceptance of risk between transplant centers, and establishes a system to account for how a combination of risk factors may be taken into consideration in candidate selection for lung transplantation. (C) 2021 The Author(s).