JOAO BATISTA BORGES SOBRINHO DORINI

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
15
Lattes
ResearcherID
ORCID
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/09 - Laboratório de Pneumologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Autor e Coautores FMUSP-HC Normalizados: MAURO ROBERTO TUCCI ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 5 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    There is no cephalocaudal gradient of computed tomography densities or lung behavior in supine patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
    (2016) EL-DASH, S. A.; BORGES, J. B.; COSTA, E. L. V.; TUCCI, M. R.; RANZANI, O. T.; CARAMEZ, M. P.; CARVALHO, C. R. R.; AMATO, M. B. P.
    Background: There is debate whether pressure transmission within the lungs and alveolar collapse follow a hydrostatic pattern or the compression exerted by the weight of the heart and the diaphragm causes collapse localized in the areas adjacent to these structures. The second hypothesis proposes the existence of a cephalocaudal gradient in alveolar collapse. We aimed to define whether or not lung density and collapse follow a 'liquid-like' pattern with homogeneous isogravitational layers along the cephalocaudal axis in acute respiratory distress syndrome lungs. Methods: Acute respiratory distress syndrome patients were submitted to full lung computed tomography scans at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) zero (before) and 25 cmH(2)O after a maximum-recruitment maneuver. PEEP was then decreased by 2 cmH2O every 4 min, and a semi-complete scan performed at the end of each PEEP step. Results: Lung densities were homogeneous within each lung layer. Lung density increased along the ventrodorsal axis toward the dorsal region (beta = 0.49, P < 0.001), while there was no increase, but rather a slight decrease, toward the diaphragm along the cephalocaudal axis and toward the heart. Higher PEEP attenuated density gradients. At PEEP 18 cmH2O, dependent lung regions started to collapse massively, while best compliance was only reached at a lower PEEP. Conclusions: We could not detect cephalocaudal gradients in lung densities or in alveolar collapse. Likely, external pressures applied on the lung by the chest wall, organs, and effusions are transmitted throughout the lung in a hydrostatic pattern with homogeneous consequences at each isogravitational layer. A single cross-sectional image of the lung could fully represent the heterogeneous mechanical properties of dependent and non-dependent lung regions.
  • article 183 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Open Lung Approach for the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial
    (2016) KACMAREK, Robert M.; VILLAR, Jesus; SULEMANJI, Demet; MONTIEL, Raquel; FERRANDO, Carlos; BLANCO, Jesus; KOH, Younsuck; SOLER, Juan Alfonso; MARTINEZ, Domingo; HERNANDEZ, Marianela; TUCCI, Mauro; BORGES, Joao Batista; LUBILLO, Santiago; SANTOS, Arnoldo; ARAUJO, Juan B.; AMATO, Marcelo B. P.; SUAREZ-SIPMANN, Fernando
    Objective: The open lung approach is a mechanical ventilation strategy involving lung recruitment and a decremental positive end-expiratory pressure trial. We compared the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome network protocol using low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure with open lung approach resulting in moderate to high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure for the management of established moderate/severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Design: A prospective, multicenter, pilot, randomized controlled trial. Setting: A network of 20 multidisciplinary ICUs. Patients: Patients meeting the American-European Consensus Conference definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome were considered for the study. Interventions: At 12-36 hours after acute respiratory distress syndrome onset, patients were assessed under standardized ventilator settings (Fio(2)0.5, positive end-expiratory pressure 10 cm H2O). If Pao(2)/Fio(2) ratio remained less than or equal to 200 mm Hg, patients were randomized to open lung approach or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome network protocol. All patients were ventilated with a tidal volume of 4 to 8 ml/kg predicted body weight. Measurements and Main Results: From 1,874 screened patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, 200 were randomized: 99 to open lung approach and 101 to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome network protocol. Main outcome measures were 60-day and ICU mortalities, and ventilator-free days. Mortality at day-60 (29% open lung approach vs. 33% Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network protocol, p = 0.18, log rank test), ICU mortality (25% open lung approach vs. 30% Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome network protocol, p = 0.53 Fisher's exact test), and ventilator-free days (8 [0-20] open lung approach vs. 7 [0-20] d Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome network protocol, p = 0.53 Wilcoxon rank test) were not significantly different. Airway driving pressure (plateau pressure - positive end-expiratory pressure) and Pao(2)/Fio(2) improved significantly at 24, 48 and 72 hours in patients in open lung approach compared with patients in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome network protocol. Barotrauma rate was similar in both groups. Conclusions: In patients with established acute respiratory distress syndrome, open lung approach improved oxygenation and driving pressure, without detrimental effects on mortality, ventilator-free days, or barotrauma. This pilot study supports the need for a large, multicenter trial using recruitment maneuvers and a decremental positive end-expiratory pressure trial in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome.