LEDA LEME TALIB

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
26
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/27 - Laboratório de Neurociências, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    A dopamine receptor D2 genetic polymorphism associated with transition to mental disorders in a cohort of individuals with at-risk mental state for psychosis
    (2023) MARQUES, Julia Hatagami; TALIB, Leda Leme; HORTENCIO, Lucas; ANDRADE, Julio Cesar; ALVES, Tania Maria; SERPA, Mauricio Henriques; YAMAMOTO, Guilherme Lopes; BILT, Martinus Theodorus van de; ROSSLER, Wulf; GATTAZ, Wagner Farid; LOCH, Alexandre Andrade
    Objectives: To test the association of 45 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with transition to psychiatric disorders in a cohort of individuals at ultrahigh risk (UHR) mental state for psychosis.Methods: Through general population screening, 88 non-help-seeking UHR subjects and 130 healthy control individuals were genotyped for 45 SNPs related to psychosis. They were followed for a mean of 2.5 years, and conversion to psychotic and to general psychiatric disorders was assessed. Genotype frequencies between controls, converters, and non-converters were analyzed.Results: There were no differences in sociodemographics between controls and UHR. Also, UHR converters and non-converters had no differences in their baseline symptoms scores. The dopamine receptor D2 gene (DRD2) SNP rs6277 was significantly more common among UHR who transitioned to psychosis (p o 0.001) and to UHR who transitioned to any psychiatric disorders (p = 0.001) when compared to UHR who did not transition. The rs6277 T allele was related to psychiatric morbidity in a dose-response fashion, being significantly more frequent in UHR converters than UHR non-converters and control subjects (p = 0.003).Conclusion: Our findings suggest that rs6277 could potentially constitute a genetic marker of transition to psychiatric disorders in subjects with at-risk mental states, warranting further investigation in larger samples.
  • article 7 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Revisiting global cognitive and functional state 13 years after a clinical trial of lithium for mild cognitive impairment
    (2023) DAMIANO, Rodolfo Furlan; LOUREIRO, Julia Cunha; PAIS, Marcos Vasconcelos; PEREIRA, Rodrigo Furtado; CORRADI, Marina de Menezes; SANTI, Talita Di; BEZERRA, Gustavo Antonio Marcolongo; RADANOVIC, Marcia; TALIB, Leda Leme; FORLENZA, Orestes Vicente
    Objectives: To re-evaluate a sample of older adults enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of lithium for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) after 11 to 15 years, re-assessing their current (or last available) global cognitive and functional state.Methods: We recalled all former participants of the Lithium-MCI trial conducted by our group between 2009 and 2012 to perform a single-blinded, cross-sectional evaluation of their global clinical state to compare the long-term outcome of those who received lithium vs. those who received placebo.Results: Of the original sample (n=61), we were able to reach 36 participants (59% of retention), of whom 22 had previously received lithium (61% of the recall sample) and 14 (39%) had received placebo. Since 30.5% of the recalled sample was deceased, psychometric data were collected only for 69.5% of the participants. We found statistically significant differences in current mean Mini Mental State Examination score according to previous treatment group (25.5 [SD, 5.3] vs. 18.3 [SD, 10.9], p = 0.04). The lithium group also had better performance in the phonemic Verbal Fluency Test than the control group (34.4 [SD, 14.4] vs. 11.6 [SD, 10.10], p o 0.001). Differences in these measures also had large effect sizes, as shown by Cohen's d values of 0.92 and 1.78, respectively.Conclusion: This data set suggests that older adults with amnestic MCI who had been treated with lithium during a previous randomized controlled trial had a better long-term global cognitive outcome than those from a matched sample who did not receive the intervention.