BRUNO ADLER MACCAGNAN PINHEIRO BESEN
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/51 - Laboratório de Emergências Clínicas, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/51 - Laboratório de Emergências Clínicas, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
65 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 65
- NEGATIVE FLUID BALANCE IN SEPSIS: WHEN AND HOW?(2017) BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro; TANIGUCHI, Leandro UtinoFluid resuscitation plays a fundamental role in the treatment of septic shock. Administration of inappropriately large quantities of fluid may lead to volume overload, which is increasingly recognized as an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality in critical illness. In the early treatment of sepsis, timely fluid challenges should be given to optimize organ perfusion, but continuous positive fluid balance is discouraged. In fact, achievement of a negative fluid balance during treatment of sepsis is associated with better outcomes. This review will discuss the relationship between fluid overload and unfavorable outcomes in sepsis, and how fluid overload can be prevented and managed.
- HOW CAN WE ESTIMATE SEPSIS INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY?(2017) GOBATTO, Andre Luiz Nunes; BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro; AZEVEDO, Luciano Cesar PontesSepsis is one of the oldest and complex syndromes in medicine that has been in debate for over two millennia. Valid and comparable data on the population burden of sepsis constitute an essential resource for guiding health policy and resource allocation. Despite current epidemiological data suggesting that the global burden of sepsis is huge, the knowledge of its incidence, prevalence, mortality, and case-fatality rates is subject to several flaws. The objective of this narrative review is to assess how sepsis incidence and mortality can be estimated, providing examples on how it has been done so far in medical literature and discussing its possible biases. Results of recent studies suggest that sepsis incidence rates are increasing consistently during the last decades. Although estimates might be biased, this probably reflects a real increase in incidence over time. Nevertheless, case fatality rates have decreased, which is a probable reflex of advances in critical care provision to this very sick population at high risk of death. This conclusion can only be drawn with a reasonable degree of certainty for high-income countries. Conversely, adequately designed studies from middle-and low-income countries are urgently needed. In these countries, sepsis incidence and case-fatality rates could be disproportionally higher due to health care provision constraints and ineffective preventive measures.
- Fluid management in diabetic ketoacidosis: new tricks for old dogs?(2021) BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro; BOER, Willem; HONORE, Patrick M.
bookPart Assincronias ventilatórias(2022) SANTOS, Yuri de Albuquerque Pessoa dos; BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro- Biased Study Design and Statistical Analysis in a Need for Intensive Care Unit Admission Surgical Prediction Model(2022) ROEPKE, Roberta Muriel Longo; BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro
bookPart Identificação de complicações pós-operatórias na UTI(2022) BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro; CESTARI, Mino; PEDRO, Rodolpho Augusto de Moura- Association of Sepsis Diagnosis at Daytime and on Weekdays with Compliance with the 3-Hour Sepsis Treatment Bundles A Multicenter Cohort Study(2020) RANZANI, Otavio T.; MONTEIRO, Mariana Barbosa; BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro; AZEVEDO, Luciano Cesar PontesRationale: Compliance with sepsis bundles is associated with better outcomes, but information to support structural actions that might improve compliance is scarce. Few studies have evaluated bundle compliance in different time periods, with conflicting results. Objectives: To evaluate the association of sepsis identification during the daytime versus during the nighttime and on weekdays versus weekends with 3-hour sepsis treatment bundle compliance. Methods: This was an observational, multicenter study including patients with sepsis admitted between 2010 and 2017 to 10 hospitals in Brazil. Our exposures of interest were daytime (7:00 A.M.-6:59 P.M.) versus nighttime (7:00 P.M.-6:59 A.M.) and weekdays (Monday 7:00 A.M.-Friday 6:59 P.M.) versus weekends (Friday 7:00 P.M.-Monday 659 A.M.). Our primary outcome was full compliance with the 3-hour sepsis treatment bundles. We adjusted by potential confounding factors with multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Of 11,737 patients (8,733 sepsis and 3,004 septic shock), 3-hour bundle compliance was 79.1% and hospital mortality was 24.7%. The adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) for 3-hour full bundle compliance for patients diagnosed during the daytime versus during the nighttime was 1.35 (95% confidence interval [CI), 1.23-1.49; P < 0.001) and was more pronounced in the emergency department (adjOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.35 1.77; P < 0.001) than in nonemergency areas (adjOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37; P = 0.014). Overall, there was no association between diagnosis on the weekends versus on weekdays and 3-hour full bundle compliance (adjOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.98-1.19; P = 0.115), although there was an association among those diagnosed in nonemergency areas (adjOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.32; P = 0.047). The lower compliance observed for sepsis diagnosed during the nighttime was more evident 2 years after implementation of the quality improvement initiative. Conclusions: Compliance with sepsis bundles was associated with the moment of sepsis diagnosis. The place of diagnosis and the time from campaign implementation were factors modifying this association. Our results support areas for better design of quality improvement initiatives to mitigate the influence of the period of sepsis diagnosis on treatment compliance.
bookPart Lesão renal aguda(2023) BUSTAMANTE, Pedro Fortes Osório; BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro- Association between piperacillin/tazobactam use and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective multicentre cohort study(2024) TOMAZINI, Bruno Martins; BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro; TANIGUCHI, Leandro Utino; ZAMPIERI, Fernando Godinho; CAVALCANTI, Alexandre BiasiBackground: Piperacillin/tazobactam is one of the most common antibiotics prescribed in the ICU and the combination of piperacillin/tazobactam with vancomycin has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. However, data on the risk of AKI with piperacillin/tazobactam, despite vancomycin co-exposure, are lacking. Objectives: To investigate the association of piperacillin/tazobactam with AKI and renal replacement therapy (RRT) among adult ICU patients. Methods: We analysed data from patients included in two open access databases (MIMIC-IV and eICU). Critically ill patients who received piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime (a cephalosporin with similar broad-spectrum activity to piperacillin/tazobactam) during their first ICU stay were eligible for the study. Marginal structural Cox models, accounting for time-fixed covariates and time-dependent covariates were performed. The primary outcomes were AKI and need of RRT. Results: A total of 20 107 patients were included, with 11 213 in the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 8894 in the cefepime group. Exposure to piperacillin/tazobactam was associated with AKI (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.51-2.07; P < 0.001) and with need of RRT (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.08-1.57; P = 0.005). Tests for interaction were not statistically significant for occurrence of AKI and RRT in the subgroup of patients exposed to vancomycin or not (P = 0.26 and P = 0.6, respectively). Conclusions: In critically ill patients, exposure to piperacillin/tazobactam was associated with increased risk of AKI and with increased risk of RRT, regardless of combination therapy with vancomycin.
- Adverse events leading to intensive care unit admission in a low-and-middle-income-country: A prospective cohort study and a systematic review(2024) PEDRO, Rodolpho Augusto de Moura; BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro; MENDES, Pedro Vitale; GOMES, Augusto Cezar Marins; CARVALHO, Marcelo Ticianelli de; MALBOUISSON, Luiz Marcelo Sa; PARK, Marcelo; TANIGUCHI, Leandro UtinoIntroduction: Adverse events (AE) are frequent in critical care and could be even more prevalent in LMIC due to a shortage of ICU beds and Human resources. There is limited data on how relevant AE are among the reasons for ICU admission, being all of which published by High-Income-Countries services. Our main goal is to describe the rate of adverse events-related ICU admissions and their preventability in a LMIC scenario, comparing our results with previous data.Methods: This was a prospective cohort study, during a one-year period, in two general ICUs from a tertiary public academic hospital. Our exposure of interest was ICU admission related to an AE in adult patients, we further characterized their preventability and clinical outcomes. We also performed a systematic review to identify and compare previous published data on ICU admissions due to AE.Results: Among all ICU admissions, 12.1% were related to an AE (9.8% caused by an AE, 2.3% related but not directly caused by an AE). These ICU admissions were not associated with a higher risk of death, but most of them were potentially preventable (70.9% of preventability rate, representing 8.6% of all ICU admissions). The meta-analysis resulted in a proportion of ICU admissions due to AE of 11% (95% CI 6%-16%), with a pre-ventability rate of 54% (95% CI 42%-66%).Conclusions: In this prospective cohort, adverse events were a relevant reason for ICU admission. This result is consistent with data retrieved from non-LMIC as shown in our meta-analysis. The high preventability rate described reinforces that quality and safety programs could work as a tool to optimize scarce resources.