DENIS PAJECKI

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
11
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
  • article 8 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    The Edmonton Obesity Staging System: assessing a potential tool to improve the management of obesity surgery in the Brazilian public health services
    (2020) OGASSAVARA, Nicolas Chiu; DIAS, Joao Gabriel Magalhaes; PAJECKI, Denis; SIQUEIRA, Jose de Oliveira; SANTO, Marco Aurelio; TESS, Beatriz Helena
    Background: Limited access to publicly funded, insurance-covered, and self-paid obesity surgery is a reality worldwide. Waiting lists for procedures are usually based on chronologic criteria and body mass index (BMI)-defined obesity categorization. Obesity classification systems assess overall health and have been proposed as an alternative. Objective: To investigate the correlation between BMI-based classification and the Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) to support current evidence that the assessment of the clinical severity of obesity could be a helpful tool to maximize access to surgery. Setting: University hospital, Brazil. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all 2011 to 2014 adult patients who underwent obesity surgery under the public health system. Data on sex, age, presurgical BMI, and co-morbidities were extracted from hospital records. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess the strength and direction of the relationship between BMI classification and EOSS. Results: Of 565 patients, 79% were female, mean age 44.1 +/- 10.9 years and mean BMI 46.9 +/- 6.2 kg/m(2). The most common EOSS stage was 2 (86.5%), followed by stages 3 (8.5%) and 1 (4.9%). There was no correlation between the severity of obesity measured by BMI and EOSS (p = - .030, P = .475). Older patients had higher Edmonton scores (p = .308, P < .001). No difference was observed regarding sex. Conclusions: No correlation was found between EOSS and BMI and between these and sex. Age correlated with both obesity indicators. EOSS was reproducible in Brazilian surgical patients and may be an important tool from a health services perspective contributing to the more efficient use of limited resources for obesity surgery.
  • conferenceObject
    CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING BARIATRIC SURGERY IN A BRAZILIAN MEDICAL SCHOOL HOSPITAL
    (2016) OGASSAVARA, N. C.; DIAS, J. G. M.; PAJECKI, D.; SANTO, M. A.; TESS, B. H.
  • article 13 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    BARIATRIC SURGERY AND BINGE EATING DISORDER: SHOULD SURGEONS CARE ABOUT IT? A LITERATURE REVIEW OF PREVALENCE AND ASSESSMENT TOOLS
    (2019) TESS, Beatriz H; MAXIMIANO-FERREIRA, Letícia; PAJECKI, Denis; WANG, Yuan-Pang
    ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Eating pathologies among bariatric surgery candidates are common and associated with adverse surgical outcomes, including weight regain and low quality of life. However, their assessment is made difficult by the great variety and inconsistent use of standardized measures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to synthesize current knowledge on the prevalence of binge eating disorder (BED) in presurgical patients and to make a critical appraisal of assessment tools for BED. METHODS: A search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 1994 to March 2017. Data were extracted, tabulated and summarized using a narrative approach. RESULTS: A total of 21 observational studies were reviewed for data extraction and analysis. Prevalence of BED in bariatric populations ranged from 2% to 53%. Considerable variation in patient characteristics and in BED assessment measures was evident among the studies. In addition, several methodological weaknesses were recognized in most of the studies. Ten different psychometric instruments were used to assess BED. Clinical interviews were used in only 12 studies, though this is the preferred tool to diagnose BED. CONCLUSION: Study heterogeneity accounted for the variability of the results from different centers and methodological flaws such as insufficient sample size and selection bias impaired the evidence on the magnitude of BED in surgical settings. For the sake of comparability and generalizability of the findings in future studies, researchers must recruit representative samples of treatment-seeking candidates for bariatric surgery and systematically apply standard instruments for the assessment of BED.
  • conferenceObject
    COMPARISON BETWEEN THE EDMONTON OBESITY STAGING SYSTEM (EOSS) AND THE BMI CLASSIFICATION IN PATIENTS SUBMITTED TO BARIATRIC SURGERY IN BRAZIL Multidisciplinary care (Primary care, Medical Management)
    (2019) PAJECKI, D.; SANTO, M. A.; OGASSAVARA, N. C.; DIAS, J. G. M.; SIQUEIRA, J. D. O.; TESS, B. H.; SILVA, M. B. D. B. E.