MIGUEL LORENZO BARBERO MARCIAL

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
4
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Departamento de Cardio-Pneumologia, Faculdade de Medicina - Docente
LIM/11 - Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Autor e Coautores FMUSP-HC Normalizados: CARINA ABIGAIL HARDY ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • article 26 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Accessory Atrioventricular Pathways Refractory to Catheter Ablation Role of Percutaneous Epicardial Approach
    (2015) SCANAVACCA, Mauricio Ibrahim; STERNICK, Eduardo Back; PISANI, Cristiano; LARA, Sissy; HARDY, Carina; D'AVILA, Andre; CORREA, Frederico Soares; DARRIEUX, Francisco; HACHUL, Denise; MARCIAL, Miguel Barbero; SOSA, Eduardo A.
    Background-Epicardial mapping and ablation of accessory pathways through a subxiphoid approach can be an alternative when endocardial or epicardial transvenous mapping has failed. Methods and Results-We reviewed acute and long-term follow-up of 21 patients (14 males) referred for percutaneous epicardial accessory pathway ablation. There was a median of 2 previous failed procedures. All patients were highly symptomatic, 8 had atrial fibrillation (3 with cardiac arrest) and 13 had frequent symptomatic episodes of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Six patients (28.5%) had a successful epicardial ablation. Five patients (23.8%) underwent a successful repeated endocardial mapping, and ablation after epicardial mapping yielded no early activation site. Epicardial mapping was helpful in guiding endocardial ablation in 2 patients (9.5%), showing that the earliest activation was simultaneous at the epicardium and endocardium. Four patients (19%) underwent successful open-chest surgery after failing epicardial/endocardial ablation. Two patients (9.5%) remained controlled under antiarrhythmic drugs after unsuccessful endocardial/epicardial ablation. Two patients had a coronary sinus diverticulum and one a right atrium to right ventricle diverticulum. Three patients acquired postablation coronary sinus stenosis. There was no major complication related to pericardial access. Conclusions-Percutaneous epicardial approach is an alternative when conventional endocardial or transvenous epicardial ablation fails in the elimination of the accessory pathway. A new attempt by endocardial approach was successful in a significant number of patients. Open-chest surgery may be required in symptomatic cases refractory to endocardial-epicardial approach.