LEA CAMPOS DE OLIVEIRA

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
14
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/46 - Laboratório de Parasitologia Médica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/03 - Laboratório de Medicina Laboratorial, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibody profiling in patients with Chagas disease treated with benznidazole assessed by genome phage display
    (2023) CARNERO, Luis Antonio Rodriguez; KURAMOTO, Andreia; OLIVEIRA, Lea Campos de; MONTEIRO, Jhonatas Sirino; SETUBAL, Joao Carlos; CUNHA-NETO, Edecio; SABINO, Ester Cerdeira; GIORDANO, Ricardo Jose
    BackgroundThere have been significant improvements in Chagas disease therapy and it is now widely accepted that most patients with chronic disease might benefit from therapy. However, there are challenges to monitor drug efficacy and cure for these patients, which are important impediments for current and future therapies. Trypanosoma cruzi-PCR is highly variable while IgG seroconversion takes decades yielding variable results depending on the antigen(s) used for the assay. Methods and resultsWe used the genomic phage display (gPhage) platform to perform a pairwise comparison of antigens and epitopes recognized by twenty individual patients with chronic Chagas disease before and after treatment with benznidazole. In total, we mapped 54,473 T. cruzi epitopes recognized by IgG from individual patients (N = 20) before benznidazole treatment. After treatment, the number of epitopes recognized by all patients was significantly smaller (21,254), a reduction consistent with a decrease in anti-T. cruzi antibodies. Most of these epitopes represent distinct fragments from the same protein and could, therefore, be grouped into 80 clusters of antigens. After three years of treatment with benznidazole, we observed a 64% reduction in the number of clusters of antigens recognized by patients (59 clusters before versus 21 clusters after treatment). The most abundant antigenic clusters recognized by patients correspond to the surface antigen CA-2 (B13) followed by the microtubule associated antigen, which highlights the value of these epitopes in Chagas disease diagnosis. Most importantly, quantitative pairwise comparison of gPhage data allowed for the prediction of patient response to treatment based on PCR status. Principal findingHere, we compiled a list of antigens and epitopes preferentially recognized by Chagas disease patients before and after benznidazole treatment. Next, we observed that gPhage data correlated with patient PCR-status and could, therefore, predict patient response to treatment. Moreover, gPhage results suggest that overall, independent of PCR status, treatment led to a reduction in the presence of T. cruzi-specific antibody levels and the number of antigens and epitopes recognized by these patients. ConclusionThe gPhage platform use of unbiased library of antigens, which is different from conventional serological assays that rely on predetermined antigens, is a contribution for the development of novel diagnostic tools for Chagas disease. Author summaryChagas disease, caused by the single-celled parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, can be a life-treating and debilitating illness. Because there is no vaccine and currently the only two available drugs are most effective if used during the early acute stage of the disease, treatment options for infected individuals are limited. Most individuals will only find out they have Chagas disease during a routine medical examination or in blood bank while donating blood, in which cases, they are already chronically infected. At this stage, treatment will not undo clinical mani-festations (i.e., cardiomyopathy) but may eliminate the parasite and prevent disease progression. Currently, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serological assays are the only diagnostic tools available, both with limi-tations in sensitivity and accuracy. The lack of effective molecular markers thus prevents physicians to deter-mine whether a patient is parasite free and cured from the disease. It also has important implications for the development of new drugs to treat Chagas disease. Here, we studied the reactivity of anti-T. cruzi antibodies in sera from a cohort of 20 patients that underwent treatment for Chagas disease using a new method developed by our group named gPhage. Using gPhage, we scanned all T. cruzi proteins to identify those that were reactive with the antibodies from each individual patient before and after treatment. In sum, gPhage data correlated with patient PCR-status and could, therefore, predict patient response to treatment. It also revealed a new set of T. cruzi proteins that could be useful for the development of future diagnostic methods.
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence over time among pregnant women admitted to delivery units: Suitability for surveillance
    (2023) MIYADAHIRA, Mariana Yumi; BRIZOT, Maria de Lourdes; ALEXANDER, Neal; SABINO, Ester Cerdeira; SILVA, Lea Campos de Oliveira da; HOSHIDA, Mara Sandra; OLIVEIRA, Ana Maria da Silva Sousa; FARCHE, Ana Claudia Silva; FRANCISCO, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira; MAYAUD, Philippe
    ObjectivesTo determine SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence over time and risk factors among pregnant women at delivery in Sao Paulo, Brazil; and to evaluate the suitability of pregnant women as a sentinel population for SARS-CoV-2 serosurveillance. MethodsUnselected consecutive pregnant women presenting at the labor ward of a single large hospital between July 20(th) 2020 to February 21(st) 2021 were enrolled and tested for SARS-CoV-2 serology using two assays: the rapid chromatic Wondfo One Step (for total IgA and IgG detection) and Roche Elecsys assay (detecting anti-nucleoprotein [N] IgG). SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was computed as smooth spline function over time with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Risk factors were evaluated for positivity by each assay. We compared timepoint seroprevalence by the two assays with four concomitant community household surveys (HHS), in which the Roche assay was used, to determine the sensitivity and relevance of the pregnant women population as sentinel population. ResultsOverall SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was 28.9% (221/763) by Roche and 17.9% (137/763) by Wondfo. Reported symptoms experienced during pregnancy were all significantly correlated with being SARS-CoV-2 seropositive at delivery with any assay (with odds-ratios ranging from 3.0 [95% CI: 2.1-4.3] for coryza to 22.8 [95% CI: 12.3-46.6] for ageusia). Seropositivity by either assay was high in women at delivery in the early period of the pandemic (June 2020), compared with seropositivity in women from the concomitant HHS: 44.1% (95% CI: 21.8-66.4) for Roche, 54.1% (30.9-78.5) for Wondfo, versus 11.4% (95% CI: 9.2-13.6) for HHS. For later periods (October 2020 and January 2021), the seropositivity in women at delivery measured by Roche corresponded well with the prevalence found among women in the HHS using the same assay, whilst prevalence measured by Wondfo dropped. ConclusionsWomen at delivery represent a highly exposed and readily accessible population for sentinel surveillance of emerging infections such as SARS-CoV-2.