CLAUDIO BOVOLENTA MURTA

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
5
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/55 - Laboratório de Urologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 5 de 5
  • article 6 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Effectiveness of Intrarectal Povidone-iodine Cleansing Plus Formalin Disinfection of the Needle Tip in Decreasing Infectious Complications After Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    (2022) PONTES-JUNIOR, Jose; FREIRE, Tiago Magalhaes; PUGLIESI, Felipe Guimaraes; COSTA, Felipe Machado de Moura; SOUZA, Vinicius Meneguette Gomes De; GALUCCI, Fabio Pescarmona; ALBERTINI, Aline; COUTO, Adriano Borba; MURTA, Claudio Bovolenta; GUGLIELMETTI, Giuliano Betoni; NAHAS, William C.; JUNIOR, Adalberto Andriolo; NETO, Alcides Mosconi; CLARO, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida
    Purpose:Prostate biopsy is mostly performed through the transrectal route worldwide and infectious complications may occur in up to 7% of cases. Therefore, alternative strategies to decrease infectious complications are needed. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of intrarectal povidone-iodine cleansing plus formalin disinfection of the needle tip in decreasing infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.Materials and Methods:We conducted a prospective, single-center, phase III trial in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy randomized 1:1 to rectal mucosa cleansing with gauze soaked in 10% povidone-iodine solution wrapped around the gloved index finger and needle tip disinfection by immersion in a 10% formalin solution before each puncture vs control group. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications defined as 1 or more of the following events: fever, urinary tract infection, or sepsis.Results:Overall, 633 patients were randomized to the intervention group and 623 to the control group. The infectious complication rate was 3.9% in the intervention group and 6.4% in the control group (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.36-0.99; P = .049). The rates of sepsis, urinary tract infection, and fever were 0.3% vs 0.5% (P = .646), 2.3% vs 4.1% (P = .071), and 1.3% vs 1.9% (P = .443), respectively. The positive urine culture rate was 5.2% in the intervention group and 9% in the control group (RR 0.57; P = .015). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the occurrence of noninfectious adverse events.Conclusions:Intrarectal povidone-iodine cleansing plus formalin disinfection of the biopsy needle tip was associated with a reduction in infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy.
  • conferenceObject
    CORRELATION BETWEEN MICRORNAS AND MRNA EXPRESSION PROFILES WITH THE PROGNOSIS OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PENILE CANCER
    (2019) MURTA, Claudio; PONTES JR., Jose; FURUYA, Tatiane; UNO, Miyuki; CARRASCO, Alexis; COELHO, Rafael; GUGLIELMETTI, Giuliano; CORDEIRO, Mauricio; FARAJ, Sheila; LEITE, Katia; SICHERO, Laura; VILLA, Luisa; SROUGI, Miguel; CHAMMAS, Roger; NAHAS, William
  • article 3 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Perioperative Morbidity of Radical Prostatectomy After Intensive Neoadjuvant Androgen Blockade in Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results of Phase II Trial Compared to a Control Group
    (2023) ILARIO, Eder N.; BASTOS, Diogo A.; GUGLIELMETTI, Giuliano B.; MURTA, Claudio B.; CARDILI, Leonardo; CORDEIRO, Mauricio D.; JUNIOR, Jose P.; COELHO, Rafael F.; NAHAS, William C.
    In this study, we investigated whether intense neoadjuvant therapy could increase the risk of complications in radical prostatectomy. After analyzing 124 patients we concluded that intense neoadjuvant therapy doesn't increase morbidity of radical prostatectomy and reduces positive surgical margins. The association of neoad-juvant therapy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy may increase the risk of perioperative thromboembolic events.Introduction: Recent studies about intense neoadjuvant therapy followed by Radical Prostatectomy (RP) lack standard-ized cr iter ia regarding surgical complications and comparison to a group of patients who underwent RP without the use of neoadjuvant therapy. The aim of this study is to describe and compare the perioperative complication rates. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, single-center phase II trial in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa). The control group included HRPCa patients who underwent RP outside the clinical trial during the same study recruit-ment period. The interventional group was randomized (1:1) to receive neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy plus abiraterone with or without apalutamide followed by RP. Complications observed up to 30 days of surgery were classi-fied based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Uni-and multivariate analyses were carried out to assess predictive factors associated with perioperative complications. Results: In total, 124 patients with HRPCa were underwent to RP between May 27, 2019 and August 6, 2021, including 61 patients in the intervention group and 63 patients in the control group. The general and major complications in the intervention group reached 29.6% and 6.6%, respectively, and 39.7% and 7.9% in the control group, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups. We observed 4.9% of thromboembolic event in the neoadjuvant group. Conclusions: There was no significant increase in morbidity rate in RP after intense neoadjuvant therapy. The association of intense androgen deprivation neoadjuvant therapy with RP and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy may increase the risk of a perioperative thromboembolic events.
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Reply by Authors
    (2022) PERRELLA, R.; VICENTINI, F. C.; PARO, E. D.; TORRICELLI, F. C. M.; MARCHINI, G. S.; DANILOVIC, A.; BATAGELLO, C. A.; MOTA, P. K. V.; FERREIRA, D. B.; COHEN, D. J.; MURTA, C. B.; CLARO, J. F. A.; GIUSTI, G.; MONGA, M.; NAHAS, W. C.; SROUGI, M.; MAZZUCCHI, E.
  • article 6 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Disruption of miRNA-mRNA Networks Defines Novel Molecular Signatures for Penile Carcinogenesis
    (2021) FURUYA, Tatiane Katsue; MURTA, Claudio Bovolenta; CARRASCO, Alexis German Murillo; UNO, Miyuki; SICHERO, Laura; VILLA, Luisa Lina; CARDILLI, Leonardo; COELHO, Rafael Ferreira; GUGLIELMETTI, Giuliano Betoni; CORDEIRO, Mauricio Dener; LEITE, Katia Ramos Moreira; NAHAS, William Carlos; CHAMMAS, Roger; JR, Jose Pontes
    Simple Summary: As there are still no biomarkers reported in clinical practice in penile cancer (PeC), we aimed to investigate and validate molecular signatures based on miRNA and mRNA profiles to identify molecular drivers and pathways involved in PeC tumorigenesis. We found eight DEmiRs and 37 DEGs comparing tumoral tissues (TT) paired with non-neoplastic tissues (NNT) of PeC patients. Four downregulated DEmiRs (miR-30a-5p, miR-432-5p, miR-487b-3p, and miR-145-5p) and six upregulated DEGs (IL1A, MCM2, MMP1, MMP12, SFN and VEGFA) were identified as potential biomarkers in PeC by their capacity of discriminating TT and NNT with accuracy. Furthermore, we performed an analysis of miRNA-mRNA interaction and found disruption in the dynamics of the regulation of eight pairs during tumor development that have never been described in PeC. Taken together, our findings contribute to a better understanding of the regulatory roles of miRNAs and altered transcripts levels in penile carcinogenesis. Penile cancer (PeC) carcinogenesis is not fully understood, and no biomarkers are reported in clinical practice. We aimed to investigate molecular signatures based on miRNA and mRNA and perform an integrative analysis to identify molecular drivers and pathways for PeC development. Affymetrix miRNA microarray was used to identify differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRs) comparing 11 tumoral tissues (TT) paired with non-neoplastic tissues (NNT) with further validation in an independent cohort (n = 13). We also investigated the mRNA expression of 83 genes in the total sample. Experimentally validated targets of DEmiRs, miRNA-mRNA networks, and enriched pathways were evaluated in silico. Eight out of 69 DEmiRs identified by microarray analysis were validated by qRT-PCR (miR-145-5p, miR-432-5p, miR-487b-3p, miR-30a-5p, miR-200a-5p, miR-224-5p, miR-31-3p and miR-31-5p). Furthermore, 37 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified when comparing TT and NNT. We identified four downregulated DEmiRs (miR-30a-5p, miR-432-5p, miR-487b-3p, and miR-145-5p) and six upregulated DEGs (IL1A, MCM2, MMP1, MMP12, SFN and VEGFA) as potential biomarkers in PeC by their capacity of discriminating TT and NNT with accuracy. The integration analysis showed eight dysregulated miRNA-mRNA pairs in penile carcinogenesis. Taken together, our findings contribute to a better understanding of the regulatory roles of miRNAs and altered transcripts levels in penile carcinogenesis.