LEANDRO CARDOSO BARCHI
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
6 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 6 de 6
- II BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON GASTRIC CANCER BY THE BRAZILIAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOCIATION(2020) BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; DIAS, Andre Roncon; ANDREOLLO, Nelson Adami; WESTON, Antonio Carlos; LOURENCO, Laercio Gomes; MALHEIROS, Carlos Alberto; KASSAB, Paulo; ZILBERSTEIN, BrunoBackground: Since the publication of the first Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer (GC) in 2012 carried out by the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association, new concepts on diagnosis, staging, treatment and follow-up have been incorporated. Aim: This new consensus is to promote an update to professionals working in the fight against GC and to provide guidelines for the management of patients with this condition. Methods: Fifty-nine experts answered 67 statements regarding the diagnosis, staging, treatment and prognosis of GC with five possible alternatives: 1) fully agree; 2) partially agree; 3) undecided; 4) disagree and 5) strongly disagree A consensus was adopted when at least 80% of the sum of the answers ""fully agree"" and ""partially agree"" was reached. This article presents only the responses of the participating experts. Comments on each statement, as well as a literature review, will be presented in future publications. Results: Of the 67 statements, there was consensus in 50 (74%). In 10 declarations, there was 100% agreement. Conclusion: The gastric cancer treatment has evolved considerably in recent years. This consensus gathers consolidated principles in the last decades, new knowledge acquired recently, as well as promising perspectives on the management of this disease.
- Surgical results of remnant gastric cancer treatment(2020) RAMOS, MARCUS FERNANDO KODAMA PERTILLE; PEREIRA, MARIA CLAUDIA MACHADO; OLIVEIRA, YARA SOUZA; PEREIRA, MARINA ALESSANDRA; BARCHI, LEANDRO CARDOSO; DIAS, ANDRE RONCON; ZILBERSTEIN, BRUNO; RIBEIRO JUNIOR, ULYSSES; CECCONELLO, IVANABSTRACT Background: remnant gastric cancer (RGC) develops five years or later after previous resection for benign or malignant lesion. The treatment is performed through completion total gastrectomy (CTG) with radical lymphadenectomy. Some reports consider this procedure may be associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Objective: to evaluate surgical results and survival after CTG in patients with RGC. Methods: 54 patients who underwent CTG between 2009 and 2019 were included in the study. As a comparison group 215 patients with primary gastric cancer (PGC) who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) in the same period were selected. Results: among the initial characteristics, age (68.0 vs. 60.5; p<0.001), hemoglobin values (10.9 vs. 12.3; p<0.001) and body mass index (22.5 vs. 24.6; p=0.005) were different between the RGC and PGC groups, respectively. The most frequent postoperative complications were related to pulmonary complications, infection and fistula in both groups. There was a higher incidence of esophagojejunal fistula in the CTG group (14.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.055). Perioperative mortality was higher in RGC patients (9.3% vs. 5.1%), but without significance (p=0.329). Hospital length of stay, postoperative complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification, mortality at 30 and 90 days were not different between groups. There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between RGC and PGC groups. Conclusion: despite previous reports, surgical results and survival were similar between groups. Higher risk of esophagojejunal fistula must be considered.
- ROBOTIC GASTRECTOMY: TECHNIQUE STANDARDIZATION(2020) DIAS, Andre Roncon; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; SZOR, Daniel Jose; ABDALLA, Ricardo; BARCHI, Leandro; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Ulysses; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, IvanBackground: Robotic gastrectomy is gaining popularity worldwide. It allows reduced blood loss and lesser pain. However, it widespread use is limited by the extensive learning curve and costs. Aim: To describe our standard technique with reduced use of robotic instruments. Methods: We detail the steps involved in the procedure, including trocar placement, necessary robotic instruments, and meticulous surgical description. Results: After standardizing the procedure, 28 patients were operated with this budget technique. For each procedure material used was: 1 (Xi model) or 2 disposable trocars (Si) and 4 robotic instruments. Stapling and clipping were performed by the assistant through an auxiliary port, limiting the use of robotic instruments and reducing the cost. Conclusion: This standardization helps implementing a robotic program for gastrectomy in the daily practice or in one's institution.
- PROXIMAL METASTATIC GASTRIC CANCER IN YOUTH: THE MAYOR OF SAO PAULO CITY AS AN EXAMPLE OF A CURRENT PHENOMENON(2020) RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; WESTON, Antonio Carlos; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno
- BRAZILIAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES (PART 1): AN UPDATE ON DIAGNOSIS, STAGING, ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP(2020) BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; MUCERIN, Donato Roberto; BRESCIANI, Claudio Jose Caldas; RIBEIRO JUNIOR, Ulysses; ANDREOLLO, Nelson Adami; ASSUMPCAO, Paulo Pimentel; WESTON, Antonio Carlos; NETO, Ramiro Colleoni; ZILBERSTEIN, BrunoBackground: The II Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer by the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association (ABCG) was recently published. On this occasion, several experts in gastric cancer expressed their opinion before the statements presented. Aim: To present the ABCG Guidelines (part 1) regarding the diagnosis, staging, endoscopic treatment and follow-up of gastric cancer patients. Methods: To forge these Guidelines, the authors carried out an extensive and current review regarding each statement present in the II Consensus, using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases with the following descriptors: gastric cancer, staging, endoscopic treatment and follow-up. In addition, each statement was classified according to the level of evidence and degree of recommendation. Results: Of the 24 statements, two (8.3%) were classified with level of evidence A, 11 (45.8%) with B and 11 (45.8%) with C. As for the degree of recommendation, six (25%) statements obtained grade of recommendation 1, nine (37.5%) recommendation 2a, six (25%) 2b and three (12.5%) grade 3. Conclusion: The guidelines presented here are intended to assist professionals working in the fight against gastric cancer with relevant and current information, granting them to be applied in the daily medical practice.
- Oncological Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy: Technical Aspects and Ongoing Data(2020) BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; SOUZA, Willy Petrini; FRANCISS, Maurice Youssef; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; DIAS, Andre Roncon; HYUNG, Woo Jin; ZILBERSTEIN, BrunoRobotic surgery through the da Vinci Surgical System has been widely spread for many procedures across the globe for several years. At the same time, robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) remains mostly available only in specialized centers in minimally invasive surgery and stomach neoplasm. The robotic platform has been introduced to overcome possible drawbacks of the laparoscopic approach. The safety and the feasibility of robotic radical gastrectomy have been reported in many retrospective case series and nonrandomized prospective studies. However, the superiority of robotic gastrectomy over the laparoscopic access has not yet been proven. This study aimed to report the technical aspects of robot-assisted gastrectomy for GC as well as the latest evidence on this subject.