LEANDRO CARDOSO BARCHI
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
5 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 5 de 5
- Developing the surgical technique reporting checklist and standards: a study protocol(2021) ZHANG, Kaiping; MA, Yanfang; SHI, Qianling; WU, Jinlin; SHEN, Jianfei; HE, Yulong; ZHANG, Xianzhuo; JIAO, Panpan; LI, Grace S.; TANG, Xueqin; PETERSEN, Rene Horsleben; NG, Calvin S. H.; FIORELLI, Alfonso; NOVOA, Nuria M.; BEDETTI, Benedetta; SANDRI, Giovanni Battista Levi; HOCHWALD, Steven; LERUT, Toni; SIHOE, Alan D. L.; BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; GILBERT, Sebastien; WASEDA, Ryuichi; TOKER, Alper; GONZALEZ-RIVAS, Diego; FRUSCIO, Robert; SCARCI, Marco; DAVOLI, Fabio; PIESSEN, Guillaume; QIU, Bin; WANG, Stephen D.; CHEN, Yaolong; GAO, ShugengBackground: Standardized and transparent reporting of surgical technique is the cornerstone of effective dissemination, implementation and improvement. However, current reporting of surgical techniques is inadequate. The existing guidelines potentially applied to guide surgical technique reporting are with a minimal highlight of the surgical technique, lack requirements explaining what extent and dimensions need to be described in detail, or are unlikely to extrapolate to a wide range of surgical techniques. This study aims to formulate a rigorous protocol to develop a surgical technique reporting checklist and standards (SUPER) that defines what a clear, comprehensive and detailed surgical technique report should be contained. Methods: This protocol is designed following the classic guidance for developing reporting guidelines recommended by the EQUATOR network. Results: The development team will consist of surgeons (similar to 80%), methodologists, and journal editors. The draft checklist sources will include a scoping review of existing reporting guidelines related to surgical technique, surgical technique articles from 15 top journals published in the last year, and brainstorming by the multidisciplinary development team. The final SUPER checklist will be formed after three rounds of Delphi surveys, one round of face-to-face meeting, and a month-long pilot test. The SUPER checklist will be published as open-access and be used in combination with existing reporting guidelines related to surgical techniques (e.g., IDEAL). This protocol will steer the SUPER checklist's development, allowing us to further elaborate surgical technique reporting for all surgical specialties, and enabling a more favorable experience for surgeons, nurses, medical students, residents, editors, and reviewers.
- Gastric partitioning for the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction(2019) RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; OLIVEIRA, Rodrigo Jose de; PEREIRA, Marina Alessandra; MUCERINO, Donato Roberto; RIBEIRO JR., Ulysses; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; CECCONELLO, IvanBACKGROUND Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is one of the main complications in stage IV gastric cancer patients. This condition is usually managed by gastrojejunostomy (GJ). However, gastric partitioning (GP) has been described as an alternative to overcoming possible drawbacks of GJ, such as delayed gastric emptying and tumor bleeding. AIM To compare the outcomes of patients who underwent GP and GJ for malignant GOO. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 60 patients who underwent palliative gastric bypass for unresectable distal gastric cancer with GOO from 2009 to 2018. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics including age, nutritional status, body mass index, and performance status were evaluated. Obstructive symptoms were graded according to GOO score (GOOS). Surgical outcomes evaluated included duration of the procedure, surgical complications, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Acceptance of oral diet after the procedure, weight gain, and overall survival were the long-term outcomes evaluated. RESULTS GP was performed in 30 patients and conventional GJ in the other 30 patients. The mean follow-up was 9.2 mo. Forty-nine (81.6%) patients died during that period. All variables were similar between groups, with the exception of worse performance status in GP patients. The mean operative time was higher in the GP group (161.2 vs 85.2 min, P < 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative complications and surgical mortality between groups. The median overall survival was 7 and 8.4 mo for the GP and GJ groups, respectively (P = 0.610). The oral acceptance of soft solids (GOOS 2) and low residue or full diet (GOOS 3) were reached by 28 (93.3%) GP patients and 22 (75.9%) GJ patients (P = 0.080). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that GOOS 2 and GOOS 3 were the main prognostic factors for survival (hazard ratio: 8.90, 95% confidence interval: 3.3823.43, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION GP is a safe and effective procedure to treat GOO. Compared to GJ, it provides similar surgical outcomes with a trend to better solid diet acceptance by patients.
- Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Brazil: current status and perspectives-a report from the Brazilian Laparoscopic Oncologic Gastrectomy Group (BLOGG)(2017) KASSAB, Paulo; COSTA JR., Wilson Luiz da; JACOB, Carlos Eduardo; CORDTS, Roberto de Moraes; CASTRO, Osvaldo Antonio Prado; BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; CECCONELLO, Ivan; CHARRUF, Amir Zeide; COIMBRA, Felipe Jose Fernandez; CURY, Antonio Moris; DINIZ, Alessandro Landskron; FARIAS, Igor Correia de; FREITAS JR., Wilson Rodrigues de; GODOY, Andre Luis de; ILIAS, Elias Jirjoss; MALHEIROS, Carlos Alberto; RAMOS, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille; RIBEIRO, Heber Salvador de Castro; DIAS, Andre Roncon; THULER, Fabio Rodrigues; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; LOURENCO, Laercio Gomes; ZILBERSTEIN, BrunoThe minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Brazil has begun about two years after the first laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) performed by Kitano in Japan, in 1991. Although the report of first surgeries shows the year of 1993, there was no dissemination of the technique until the years 2010. At that time with the improvement of optical devices, laparoscopic instruments and with the publications coming from Asia, several Brazilian surgeons felt encouraged to go to Korea and Japan to learn the standardization of the LG. After that there was a significant increase in that type of surgery, especially after the IRCAD opened a branch in Brazil. The growing interest for the subject led some services to begin their own experience with the LG and, since the beginning, the results were similar with those found in the open surgery. Nevertheless, there were some differences with the papers published initially in Japan and Korea. In those countries, the surgeries were laparoscopic assisted, meaning that, in the majority of cases, the anastomoses were done through a mini-incision in the end of the procedure. In Brazil since the beginning it was performed completely through laparoscopic approach due to the skills acquired by Brazilian surgeons in bariatric surgeries. Another difference was the stage. While in the east the majority of cases were done in T1 patients, in Brazil, probably due to the lack of early cases, the surgeries were done also in advanced cases. The initial experience of Zilberstein et al. revealed low rates of morbidity without mortality. Comparing laparoscopic and open surgery, the group from Barretos/IRCAD showed shorter surgical time (216x255 minutes), earlier oral or enteral feeding and earlier hospital discharge, with a smaller number of harvested lymph nodes (28 in laparoscopic against 33 in open surgery). There was no significant difference regarding morbidity, mortality and reoperation rate. In the first efforts to publish a multicentric study the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association (BGCA) collected data from three institutions analyzing 148 patients operated from 2006 to 2016. There were 98 subtotal, 48 total and 2 proximal gastrectomies. The anastomoses were totally laparoscopic in 105, laparoscopic assisted in 21, cervical in 2, and 20 open (after conversion). The reconstruction methods were: 142 Roux-en-Y, two Billroth I, and three other types. The conversion rate was 13.5% (20/148). The D2 dissection was performed in 139 patients. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 34.4. If we take only the D2 cases the mean number was 39.5. The morbidity rate was 22.3%. The mortality was 2.7%. The stages were: IA-59, IB-14, IIA-11, IIB-15, IIIA-9, IIIB-19, IIIC-11 and stage IV-three cases. Four patients died from the disease and 10 are alive with disease. The participating services have already begun the robotic gastrectomy with satisfactory results. The intention of this group is to begin now a prospective multicentric study to confirm the data already obtained with the retrospective studies.
- Favorable minimal invasive surgery in the treatment of superior mesenteric artery syndrome: Case report(2016) BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; ALVES, Aline Marcilio; JACOB, Carlos Eduardo; BRESCIANI, Claudio Jose Caldas; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; NOGUEIRA, Tarsila Gasparotto; CECCONELLO, Ivan; ZILBERSTEIN, BrunoINTRODUCTION: The Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome (SMAS) is a rare form of intestinal obstruction. The diagnosis is based on findings from imaging studies, including vascular compression of the duodenum by the SMA and can be associated with duodenal dilatation. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a case of a patient with SMAS and recurrent episodes of intestinal obstruction, which was successfully treated by laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy. DISCUSSION: The initial treatment is usually conservative for patient's clinical improvement. Surgery is indicated when conservative treatment fails as well for patients with recurrent symptoms. Minimal invasive surgery might be a good approach, specially in patients who suffers from this disease and currently are in depleted health conditions. CONCLUSION: The procedure herein demonstrated may be considered safe and resolutive, with good visualization of structures, relative short surgical time and fast post-operative recovery. (C) 2016 The Authors.
- Management of postoperative complications of lymphadenectomy(2016) BARCHI, Leandro Cardoso; CHARRUF, Amir Zeide; OLIVEIRA, Rodrigo Jose de; JACOB, Carlos Eduardo; CECCONELLO, Ivan; ZILBERSTEIN, BrunoGastric cancer remains a disease with poor prognosis, mainly due to its late diagnosis. Surgery remains as the only treatment with curative intent, where the goal is radical resection with free-margin gastrectomy and extended lymphadenectomy. Over the last two decades there has been an improvement on postoperative outcomes. However, complications rate is still not negligible even in high volume specialized centers and are directly related mainly to the type of gastric resection: total or subtotal, combined with adjacent organs resection and the extension of lymphadenectomy (D1, D2 and D3). The aim of this study is to analyze the complications specific-related to lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery.