WANDERLEY MARQUES BERNARDO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
28
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
FMUSP, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/47 - Laboratório de Hepatologia por Vírus, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

search.filters.applied.f.dateIssued: 2019 ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 33
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Guidelines Program of the Brazilian Medical Association
    (2019) BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques
  • conferenceObject
    COMPARATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT METHODS OF SURVEILLANCE OF DYSPLASTIC LESIONS IN PATIENTS WIHT ULCERATIVE COLITIS AND CROHN'S DISEASE: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS
    (2019) RESENDE, Ricardo H.; BERNARDO, Wanderlei M.; MARCO, Michele O. De; REZENDE, Daniel T.; MOTA, Raquel Cristina L.; BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; FURUYA, Carlos K.; ISHIDA, Robson K.; KUGA, Rogerio; MOURA, Eduardo G. de
  • conferenceObject
    PREDICTORS OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX AFTER POEM FOR ACHALASIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    (2019) MOTA, Raquel Cristina L.; MOURA, Eduardo G. de; MOURA, Diogo T. de; MOURA, Eduardo T.; FARIAS, Galileu F.; BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; BERNARDO, Wanderlei M.; SAKAI, Paulo; THOMPSON, Christopher C.
  • article 36 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Laparoscopic vs. open left lateral sectionectomy: An update meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials
    (2019) MACACARI, Rodrigo Luiz; COELHO, Fabricio Ferreira; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; KRUGER, Jaime Arthur Pirola; JEISMANN, Vagner Birk; FONSECA, Gilton Marques; CESCONETTO, Danielle Menezes; CECCONELLO, Ivan; HERMAN, Paulo
    Background: Left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) is thought to be the anatomical liver resection most suitable for the laparoscopic approach. Despite increasing popularity, comparative analysis of laparoscopic and open LLS are mostly limited to retrospective, underpowered studies with small sample size. Recent population-based studies and prospective trials have generated new data; however, this new body of knowledge has not been submitted systematic reviews or meta-analyses and high quality evidence regarding the actual benefits of minimally invasive LLS is lacking. Methods: Systematic review of studies published until December 31st, 2017 and indexed in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library Central and Scielo/LILACS databases. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing perioperative results of laparoscopic and open LLS were included. Studies with patients submitted to LLS for living donation were excluded. Treatment outcomes, including conversion rates, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, operative time, length of in-hospital stay, morbidity and mortality rates, were evaluated. Results: The primary search yielded 2838 articles, 23 of which (21 observational studies and 2 randomized controlled trials; 3415 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall conversion rate was 7.4%. Patients submitted to laparoscopic LLS had less blood loss (mean difference, MD = - 119.81 ml, 95% CI = - 127.90, - 111.72, P < .00001, I-2 = 32%, N = 618), lower transfusion rates (4.1% vs. 10.1%; risk difference, RD = - 0.06, 95% CI = - 0.08, - 0.05, P < .00001, I-2 = 13%, N = 2968) and shorter length of in-hospital stay (MD = - 2.02 days, 95% CI = - 2.15, - 1.89, P < .00001, I-2 = 77%, N= 3160) compared to those undergoing open surgery. Marginally decreased overall complication (21.4% vs. 27.5%; RD = -0.03, 95% CI = - 0.06, 0.00, P =. 05, I-2 = 0%, N= 3268) and perioperative mortality (0.3% vs. 1.5%; RD = - 0.01, 95% CI = - 0.02, - 0.00, P =. 01, I-2 = 0%; N= 3332) rates were also observed. Operative time and biliary, cardiac or pulmonary complication rates did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: Current evidence supports the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic LLS. The laparoscopic approach is associated with reduced blood loss, lower transfusion rates and shorter length of in-hospital stay and should be considered the gold-standard for LLS.
  • article
    Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus placebo for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    (2019) SERRANO, Juan Pablo Roman; MOURA, Diogoturiani Hourneaux de; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; FRANZINI, Tomazo Prince; MOURA, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de; BRUNALDI, Vitor Ottoboni; SALESSE, Marianne Torrezan; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux De
    Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary therapeutic procedure for treatment of diseases that affect the biliary tree and pancreatic duct. While the therapeutic success rate of ERCP is high, the procedure can cause complications, such as acute pancreatitis (PEP), bleeding, and perforation. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in preventing PEP following (ERCP). Materials and methods We searched databases, such as MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Library. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of NSAIDs and placebo for the prevention of PEP were included. Outcomes assessed included incidence of PEP, severity of pancreatitis, route of administration, and type of NSAIDs. Results Twenty-one RCTs were considered eligible with a total of 6854 patients analyzed. Overall, 3427 patients used NSAIDs before ERCP and 3427 did not use the drugs (control group). In the end, 250 cases of acute pancreatitis post-ERCP were diagnosed in the NSAIDs group and 407 cases in the placebo group. Risk for PEP was lower in the NSAID group (risk difference (RD): -0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.07 to -0.03; number need to treat (NNT), 20; P<0.05). Use of NSAIDs effectively prevented mild pancreatitis compared with use of placebo (2.5% vs. 4.1%; 95% CI, -0.05 to -0.01; NNT, 33; P<0.05), but the information on moderate and severe PEP could not be completely elucidated. Only rectal administration reduced incidence of PEP (6.8% vs. 13 %; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.04; NNT, 20; P<0.05). Furthermore, only diclofenac or indomethacin use was effective in preventing PEP. Conclusions Rectal administration of diclofenac and indomethacin significantly reduced risk of developing mild PEP. Further RCTs are needed to compare efficacy between NSAID administration pathways in prevention of PEP after ERCP.
  • conferenceObject
    THE ROLE OF THE ENDOSCOPIC BALLOON DILATION OF THE MAJOR PAPILLA IN MANAGING COMMON BILE DUCT STONES: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    (2019) MATSUBAYASHI, Carolina O.; BERNARDO, Wanderlei M.; MARCO, Michele O. De; RESENDE, Ricardo H.; REZENDE, Daniel T.; MOTA, Raquel Cristina L.; BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; LUZ, Gustavo O.; FRANZINI, Tomazo; MOURA, Eduardo G. de
  • conferenceObject
    EUS VERSUS ERCP FOR PRIMARY DRAINAGE OF MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS BASED ON RANDOMIZED TRIALS
    (2019) LOGIUDICE, Fernanda P.; BERNARDO, Wanderlei M.; GALETTI, Facundo; FUNARI, Mateus P.; SAGAE, Vitor M.; MATSUBAYASHI, Carolina O.; BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; CHENG, Spencer; MOURA, Eduardo G. de
  • article 6 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in postmenopausal women: a systematic review
    (2019) VALLADARES, Tania; SIMOES, Ricardo; BERNARDO, Wanderley; SCHMITT, Ana Carolina Basso; CARDOSO, Maria Regina A.; ALDRIGHI, Jose Mendes
    BACKGROUND: Hypovitaminosis D is considered a global public health issue. Knowledge of its true dimensions will allow us to design interventions and plan preventive measures that can have a significant impact on human health. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D, defined as a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration < 30 ng/ml, in postmenopausal women around the world, as well as to identify the potential associated factors. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses recommendations. Specific search terms were consulted in Medline, Excerpta Medica, and Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature databases, with no restriction for the year or language of publication. RESULTS: Of 451 studies initially identified, 32 were selected for analysis. Collectively, those 32 studies evaluated 21,236 postmenopausal women, of whom 16,440 (77.4%) had serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations < 30 ng/ml. The reported prevalence of hypovitaminosis D ranged from 29% (in the United States) to 99.4% (in China). In six of the studies, the prevalence was above 90%. CONCLUSIONS: If the criterion is the 30 ng/ml cut-off point, the majority of postmenopausal women in the world could be classified as having hypovitaminosis D. Among the studies evaluated, the lowest prevalence reported was nearly 30%. Neither latitude, region of the world, nor laboratory methodology were found to be associated with the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D.
  • article 25 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for plaque psoriasis - Brazilian Society of Dermatology
    (2019) ARNONE, Marcelo; TAKAHASHI, Maria Denise Fonseca; CARVALHO, Andre Vicente Esteves de; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; BRESSAN, Aline Lopes; RAMOS, Andrea Machado Coelho; TERENA, Aripuana Coberio; SOUZA, Cacilda da Silva; NUNES, Daniel Holthausen; BORTOLETTO, Maria Cecilia de Carvalho; OLIVEIRA, Maria de Fatima Santos Paim de; NEFFA, Jane Marcy; FIERI, Luciana Cristina; AZULAY-ABULAFIA, Luna; FELIX, Paulo Antonio Oldani; MAGALHAES, Renata Ferreira; ROMITIL, Ricardo; JAIME, Tatiana Jerez
    Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects 1.3% of the Brazilian population. The most common clinical manifestations are erythematous, scaling lesions that affect both genders and can occur on any anatomical site, preferentially involving the knees, elbows, scalp and genitals. Besides the impact on the quality of life, the systemic nature of the disease makes psoriasis an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, especially in young patients with severe disease. By an initiative of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology, dermatologists with renowned clinical experience in the management of psoriasis were invited to form a work group that, in a partnership with the Brazilian Medical Association, dedicated themselves to create the Plaque Psoriasis Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines. The relevant issues for the diagnosis (evaluation of severity and comorbidities) and treatment of plaque psoriasis were defined. The issues generated a search strategy in the Medline-PubMed database up to July 2018. Subsequently, the answers to the questions of the recommendations were devised, and each reference selected presented the respective level of recommendation and strength of scientific evidence. The final recommendations for making up the final text were worded by the coordinators.
  • article
    Propofol vs traditional sedatives for sedation in endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    (2019) DELGADO, Aureo Augusto de Almeida; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; BAZARBASHI, Ahmad Najdat; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de
    BACKGROUND Propofol is commonly used for sedation during endoscopic procedures. Data suggests its superiority to traditional sedatives used in endoscopy including benzodiazepines and opioids with more rapid onset of action and improved post-procedure recovery times for patients. However, Propofol requires administration by trained healthcare providers, has a narrow therapeutic index, lacks an antidote and increases risks of cardio-pulmonary complications. AIM To compare, through a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, sedation with propofol to traditional sedatives with or without propofol during endoscopic procedures. METHODS A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, LILACS, BVS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases. The last search in the literature was performed on March, 2019 with no restriction regarding the idiom or the year of publication. Only randomized clinical trials with full texts published were included. We divided sedation therapies to the following groups: (1) Propofol versus benzodiazepines and/or opiate sedatives; (2) Propofol versus Propofol with benzodiazepine and/or opioids; and (3) Propofol with adjunctive benzodiazepine and opioid versus benzodiazepine and opioid. The following outcomes were addressed: Adverse events, patient satisfaction with type of sedation, endoscopists satisfaction with sedation administered, dose of propofol administered and time to recovery post procedure. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5 software version 5.39. RESULTS A total of 23 clinical trials were included (n = 3854) from the initial search of 6410 articles. For Group I (Propofol vs benzodiazepine and/or opioids): The incidence of bradycardia was not statistically different between both sedation arms (RD: -0.01, 95%CI: -0.03-+0.01, I-2: 22%). In 10 studies, the incidence of hypotension was not statistically difference between sedation arms (RD: 0.01, 95%CI: -0.02-+0.04, I-2: 0%). Oxygen desaturation was higher in the propofol group but not statistically different between groups (RD: -0.03, 95%CI: -0.06-+0.00, I-2: 25%). Patients were more satisfied with their sedation in the benzodiazepine + opioid group compared to those with monotherapy propofol sedation (MD: +0.89, 95%CI: +0.62-+1.17, I-2: 39%). The recovery time after the procedure showed high heterogeneity even after outlier withdrawal, there was no statistical difference between both arms (MD: -15.15, 95%CI: -31.85-+1.56, I-2: 99%). For Group II (Propofol vs propofol with benzodiazepine and/or opioids): Bradycardia had a tendency to occur in the Propofol group with benzodiazepine and/or opioid-associated (RD: -0.08, 95%CI: -0.13--0.02, I-2: 59%). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of bradycardia (RD: -0.00, 95%CI: -0.08-+0.08, I-2: 85%), desaturation (RD: -0.00, 95%CI: -0.03-+0.02, I-2: 44%) or recovery time (MD: -2.04, 95%CI: -6.96-+2.88, I-2: 97%) between sedation arms. The total dose of propofol was higher in the propofol group with benzodiazepine and/or opiates but with high heterogeneity. (MD: 70.36, 95%CI: +53.11-+87.60, I-2: 61%). For Group III (Propofol with benzodiazepine and opioid vs benzodiazepine and opioid): Bradycardia and hypotension was not statistically significant between groups (RD: -0.00, 95%CI: -0.002-+0.02, I-2: 3%; RD: 0.04, 95%CI: -0.05-+0.13, I-2: 77%). Desaturation was evaluated in two articles and was higher in the propofol + benzodiazepine + opioid group, but with high heterogeneity (RD: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.08-+0.22, I-2: 95%). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that the use of propofol alone or in combination with traditional adjunctive sedatives is safe and does not result in an increase in negative outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures.