DANIEL JOELSONS

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
6
Lattes
ORCID
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Assunto: Bronchoscopy ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 60 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy versus bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in critically ill patients (TRACHUS): a randomized noninferiority controlled trial
    (2016) GOBATTO, Andre Luiz Nunes; BESEN, Bruno A. M. P.; TIERNO, Paulo F. G. M. M.; MENDES, Pedro V.; CADAMURO, Filipe; JOELSONS, Daniel; MELRO, Livia; CARMONA, Maria J. C.; SANTORI, Gregorio; PELOSI, Paolo; PARK, Marcelo; MALBOUISSON, Luiz M. S.
    Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is routinely performed in the intensive care unit with bronchoscopy guidance. Recently, ultrasound has emerged as a potentially useful tool to assist PDT and reduce procedure-related complications. An open-label, parallel, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing an ultrasound-guided PDT with a bronchoscopy-guided PDT in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. The primary outcome was procedure failure, defined as a composite end-point of conversion to a surgical tracheostomy, unplanned associated use of bronchoscopy or ultrasound during PDT, or the occurrence of a major complication. A total of 4965 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 171 patients were eligible and 118 underwent the procedure, with 60 patients randomly assigned to the ultrasound group and 58 patients to the bronchoscopy group. Procedure failure occurred in one (1.7 %) patient in the ultrasound group and one (1.7 %) patient in the bronchoscopy group, with no absolute risk difference between the groups (90 % confidence interval, -5.57 to 5.85), in the ""as treated"" analysis, not including the prespecified margin of 6 % for noninferiority. No other patient had any major complication in either group. Procedure-related minor complications occurred in 20 (33.3 %) patients in the ultrasound group and in 12 (20.7 %) patients in the bronchoscopy group (P = 0.122). The median procedure length was 11 [7-19] vs. 13 [8-20] min (P = 0.468), respectively, and the clinical outcomes were also not different between the groups. Ultrasound-guided PDT is noninferior to bronchoscopy-guided PDT in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
  • article 44 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Comparison between ultrasound- and bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study
    (2015) GOBATTO, Andre Luiz Nunes; BESEN, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro; TIERNO, Paulo Fernando Guimaraes Morando Marzocchi; MENDES, Pedro Vitale; CADAMURO, Filipe; JOELSONS, Daniel; MELRO, Livia; PARK, Marcelo; MALBOUISSON, Luiz Marcelo Sa
    Introduction: Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is routinely performed in the intensive care unit with bronchoscopic guidance. Recently, ultrasound (US) has emerged as a new safety adjunct tool to increase the efficacy of PDT. However, the available data are limited to case series without any control group. Hence, a retrospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of US-guided PDT compared with bronchoscopy-guided PDT. Methods: All patients who were submitted to PDT after the standardization of US-guided PDT technique in our institution were analyzed. Demographic and procedure-related variables, complications, and clinical outcomes were collected and compared in patients undergoing US- or bronchoscopy-guided PDT. Results: Sixty patients who had been submitted to PDT were studied, including 11 under bronchoscopy guidance and 49 under US guidance. No surgical conversion was necessary in any of the procedures, and bronchoscopy assistance was only required in 1 case in the US group. The procedure length was shorter in the US group than in the bronchoscopy group (12 vs 15 minutes, P = .028). None of the patients had any major complications. The minor complication rates were not significantly different between the groups, nor was the probability of breathing without assistance within 28 days, intensive care unit length of stay, or hospital mortality. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided PDT is effective, safe, and associated with similar complication rates and clinical outcomes compared with bronchoscopy-guided PDT.