LEWIS FLETCHER BUSS
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/46 - Laboratório de Parasitologia Médica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
4 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
- Higher risk of death from COVID-19 in low-income and non-White populations of SAo Paulo, Brazil(2021) LI, Sabrina L.; PEREIRA, Rafael H. M.; JR, Carlos A. Prete; ZAREBSKI, Alexander E.; EMANUEL, Lucas; ALVES, Pedro J. H.; PEIXOTO, Pedro S.; V, Carlos K. Braga; SANTOS, Andreza Aruska de Souza; SOUZA, William M. de; BARBOSA, Rogerio J.; BUSS, Lewis F.; MENDRONE, Alfredo; ALMEIDA-NETO, Cesar de; FERREIRA, Suzete C.; SALLES, Nanci A.; MARCILIO, Izabel; WU, Chieh-Hsi; GOUVEIA, Nelson; NASCIMENTO, Vitor H.; SABINO, Ester C.; FARIA, Nuno R.; MESSINA, Jane P.IntroductionLittle evidence exists on the differential health effects of COVID-19 on disadvantaged population groups. Here we characterise the differential risk of hospitalisation and death in SAo Paulo state, Brazil, and show how vulnerability to COVID-19 is shaped by socioeconomic inequalities.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using hospitalised severe acute respiratory infections notified from March to August 2020 in the Sistema de Monitoramento Inteligente de SAo Paulo database. We examined the risk of hospitalisation and death by race and socioeconomic status using multiple data sets for individual-level and spatiotemporal analyses. We explained these inequalities according to differences in daily mobility from mobile phone data, teleworking behaviour and comorbidities.ResultsThroughout the study period, patients living in the 40% poorest areas were more likely to die when compared with patients living in the 5% wealthiest areas (OR: 1.60, 95% CI 1.48 to 1.74) and were more likely to be hospitalised between April and July 2020 (OR: 1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.12). Black and Pardo individuals were more likely to be hospitalised when compared with White individuals (OR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.46; OR: 1.26, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.28, respectively), and were more likely to die (OR: 1.13, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.19; 1.07, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.10, respectively) between April and July 2020. Once hospitalised, patients treated in public hospitals were more likely to die than patients in private hospitals (OR: 1.40%, 95% CI 1.34% to 1.46%). Black individuals and those with low education attainment were more likely to have one or more comorbidities, respectively (OR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.39; 1.36, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.45).ConclusionsLow-income and Black and Pardo communities are more likely to die with COVID-19. This is associated with differential access to quality healthcare, ability to self-isolate and the higher prevalence of comorbidities.
- SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and COVID-19 among 5 years-old Amazonian children and their association with poverty and food insecurity(2022) FERREIRA, Marcelo U.; GIACOMINI, Isabel; SATO, Priscila M.; LOURENCO, Barbara H.; NICOLETE, Vanessa C.; BUSS, Lewis F.; MATIJASEVICH, Alicia; CASTRO, Marcia C.; CARDOSO, Marly A.Background The epidemiology of childhood SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related illness remains little studied in high-transmission tropical settings, partly due to the less severe clinical manifestations typically developed by children and the limited availability of diagnostic tests. To address this knowledge gap, we investigate the prevalence and predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection (either symptomatic or not) and disease in 5 years-old Amazonian children. Methodology/Principal findings We retrospectively estimated SARS-CoV-2 attack rates and the proportion of infections leading to COVID-19-related illness among 660 participants in a population-based birth cohort study in the Jurua ' Valley, Amazonian Brazil. Children were physically examined, tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies, and had a comprehensive health questionnaire administered during a follow-up visit at the age of 5 years carried out in January or June-July 2021. We found serological evidence of past SARS-CoV-2 infection in 297 (45.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 41.2-48.9%) of 660 cohort participants, but only 15 (5.1%; 95% CI, 2.9-8.2%) seropositive children had a prior medical diagnosis of COVID-19 reported by their mothers or guardians. The period prevalence of clinically apparent COVID19, defined as the presence of specific antibodies plus one or more clinical symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 (cough, shortness of breath, and loss of taste or smell) reported by their mothers or guardians since the pandemic onset, was estimated at 7.3% (95% CI, 5.4-9.5%). Importantly, children from the poorest households and those with less educated mothers were significantly more likely to be seropositive, after controlling for potential confounders by mixed-effects multiple Poisson regression analysis. Likewise, the period prevalence of COVID-19 was 1.8-fold (95%, CI 1.2-2.6-fold) higher among cohort participants exposed to food insecurity and 3.0-fold (95% CI, 2.8-3.5-fold) higher among those born to non-White mothers. Finally, children exposed to household and family contacts who had COVID-19 were at an increased risk of being SARS-CoV-2 seropositive and-even more markedly-of having had clinically apparent COVID-19 by the age of 5 years. Conclusions/Significance Childhood SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-associated illness are substantially under-diagnosed and underreported in the Amazon. Children in the most socioeconomically vulnerable households are disproportionately affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease. Author summary The epidemiology of childhood COVID-19 in the tropics remains a relatively neglected research topic, in part because SARS-CoV-2 typically causes fewer severe illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths in children than in adults. Here we show that 45% of 660 participants in a birth cohort study in the Brazilian Amazon had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the age of 5 years, although only 5% of them reported previously diagnosed COVID-19 episodes-implying that as many as 8 in 9 SARS-CoV-2 infections had remained undiagnosed in these young children. Only 16% of the seropositive children had reportedly experienced cough, shortness of breath, and/or loss of taste or smell. The most socioeconomically vulnerable participants were more likely to have experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection and overt COVID-19 by the age of 5 years. Importantly, children exposed to household food insecurity, which affects 54% of our study participants, had their COVID-19 risk increased by 76%.
- Healthcare-associated infections on the intensive care unit in 21 Brazilian hospitals during the early months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: An ecological study(2023) PORTO, Ana Paula M.; BORGES, Igor C.; BUSS, Lewis; MACHADO, Anna; BASSETTI, Bil R.; COCENTINO, Brunno; BICALHO, Camila S.; CARRILHO, Claudia; RODRIGUES, Cristhieni; NETO, Eudes A. S.; GIRAO, Evelyne S.; PIASTRELLI, Filipe; SAPIENZA, Giovanna; VARKULJA, Glaucia; KOLBE, Karin; PASSOS, Luciana; ESTEVES, Patricia; GITIRANA, Pollyana; FEIJO, Regia D. F.; COUTINHO, Rosane L.; GUIMARAES, Thais; FERRAZ, Tiago L. L.; LEVIN, Anna S.; COSTA, Silvia F.Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a global health crisis and may have affected healthcare-associated infection (HAI) prevention strategies. We evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HAI incidence in Brazilian intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: In this ecological study, we compared adult patients admitted to the ICU from April through June 2020 (pandemic period) with the same period in 2019 (prepandemic period) in 21 Brazilian hospitals. We used the Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test in a pairwise analysis to compare the following differences between the pandemic and the prepandemic periods: microbiologically confirmed central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence density (cases per 1,000 central line and ventilator days, respectively), the proportion of organisms that caused HAI, and antibiotic consumption (DDD). Results: We detected a significant increase in median CLABSI incidence during the pandemic: 1.60 (IQR, 0.44-4.20) vs 2.81 (IQR, 1.35-6.89) (P = .002). We did not detect a significant difference in VAP incidence between the 2 periods. In addition, we detected a significant increase in the proportion of CLABSI caused by Enterococcus faecalis and Candida spp during the pandemic, although only the latter retained statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons. We did not detect a significant change in ceftriaxone, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, or vancomycin consumption between the studied periods. Conclusions: There was an increase in CLABSI incidence in Brazilian ICUs during the first months of COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, we detected an increase in the proportion of CLABSI caused by E. faecalis and Candida spp during this period. CLABSI prevention strategies must be reinforced in ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Performance of at-home self-collected saliva and nasal-oropharyngeal swabs in the surveillance of COVID-19(2021) BRAZ-SILVA, Paulo H.; MAMANA, Ana C.; ROMANO, Camila M.; FELIX, Alvina C.; V, Anderson de Paula; FEREIRA, Noeli E.; BUSS, Lewis F.; TOZETTO-MENDOZA, Tania R.; V, Rafael A. Caixeta; LEAL, Fabio E.; GRESPAN, Regina M. Z.; BIZARIO, Joao C. S.; FERRAZ, Andrea B. C.; SAPKOTA, Dipak; GIANNECCHINI, Simone; TO, Kelvin K.; DOGLIO, Alain; MENDES-CORREA, Maria C.Background: SARS-CoV-2 quickly spreads in the worldwide population, imposing social restrictions to control the infection, being the massive testing another essential strategy to break the chain of transmission. Aim: To compare the performance of at-home self-collected samples - saliva and combined nasal-oropharyngeal swabs (NOP) - for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a telemedicine platform for COVID-19 surveillance. Material and methods: We analyzed 201 patients who met the criteria of suspected COVID-19. NOP sampling was combined (nostrils and oropharynx) and saliva collected using a cotton pad device. Detection of SARS-COV-2 was performed by using the Altona RealStar (R) SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit 1.0. Results: There was an overall significant agreement (kappa coefficient value of 0.58) between saliva and NOP. Considering results in either sample, 70 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 were identified, with 52/70 being positive in NOP and 55/70 in saliva. This corresponds to sensitivities of 74.2% (95% CI; 63.7% to 83.1%) for NOP and 78.6% (95% CI; 67.6% to 86.6%) for saliva. Conclusion: Our data show the feasibility of using at-home self-collected samples (especially saliva), as an adequate alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This new approach of testing can be useful to develop strategies for COVID-19 surveillance and for guiding public health decisions.