MAURICIO KAZUYOSHI MINATA

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
8
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Autor e Coautores FMUSP-HC Normalizados: FLAVIO HIROSHI ANANIAS MORITA ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 8 de 8
  • article 111 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Narrow band imaging versus lugol chromoendoscopy to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    (2017) MORITA, Flavio Hiroshi Ananias; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; IDE, Edson; ROCHA, Rodrigo Silva Paula; AQUINO, Julio Cesar Martins; MINATA, Mauricio Kazuyoshi; YAMAZAKI, Kendi; MARQUES, Sergio Barbosa; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de
    Background: In the early stage esophageal cancer, changes in the mucosa are subtle and pass unnoticed in endoscopic examinations using white light. To increase sensitivity, chromoscopy with Lugol's solution has been used. Technological advancements have led to the emergence of virtual methods of endoscopic chromoscopy, including narrow band imaging (NBI). NBI enhances the relief of the mucosa and the underlying vascular pattern, providing greater convenience without the risks inherent to the use of vital dye. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the ability of NBI to diagnose squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and to compare it to chromoscopy with Lugol's solution. Methods: This systematic review included all studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of NBI and Lugol chromoendoscopy performed to identify high-grade dysplasia and/or squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus. In the meta-analysis, we calculated and demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood values in forest plots. We also determined summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves and estimates of the areas under the curves for both per-patient and per-lesion analysis. Results: The initial search identified 7079 articles. Of these, 18 studies were included in the systematic review and 12 were used in the meta-analysis, for a total of 1911 patients. In per-patient and per-lesion analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood values for Lugol chromoendoscopy were 92% and 98, 82 and 37%, 5.42 and 1.4, and 0.13 and 0.39, respectively, and for NBI were 88 and 94%, 88 and 65%, 8.32 and 2.62, and 0.16 and 0.12, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in only specificity values, in which case NBI was superior to Lugol chromoendoscopy in both analyses. In the per-patient analysis, the area under the sROC curve for Lugol chromoendoscopy was 0.9559. In the case of NBI, this value was 0.9611; in the per-lesion analysis, this number was 0.9685 and 0.9587, respectively. Conclusions: NBI was adequate in evaluating the esophagus in order to diagnose high-grade dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. In the differentiation of those disorders from other esophageal mucosa alterations, the NBI was shown to be superior than Lugol.
  • conferenceObject
    Carbon Dioxide Insufflation Versus Air Insufflation in Enteroscopy: A Systematic Review
    (2017) AQUINO, Julio Cesar M.; MOURA, Eduardo G. de; BERNARDO, Wanderlei M.; MINATA, Mauricio K.; ROCHA, Rodrigo S.; MORITA, Flavio Hiroshi A.; IDE, Edson; KUGA, Rogerio; ISHIDA, Robson K.
  • article
    Sodium picosulphate or polyethylene glycol before elective colonoscopy in outpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    (2018) ROCHA, Rodrigo Silva de Paula; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MINATA, Mauricio Kazuyoshi; MORITA, Flavio Hiroshi Ananias; AQUINO, Julio Cesar Martins; BABA, Elisa Ryoka; MIYAJIMA, Nelson Tomio; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de
    AIM To determine the best option for bowel preparation [sodium picosulphate or polyethylene glycol (PEG)] for elective colonoscopy in adult outpatients. METHODS A systematic review of the literature following the PRISMA guidelines was performed using Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Central, Cinahl and Lilacs. No restrictions were placed for country, year of publication or language. The last search in the literature was performed on November 20th, 2017. Only randomized clinical trials with full texts published were included. The subjects included were adult outpatients who underwent bowel cleansing for elective colonoscopy. The included studies compared sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) and PEG for bowel preparation. Exclusion criteria were the inclusion of inpatients or groups with specific conditions, failure to mention patient status (outpatient or inpatient) or dietary restrictions, and permission to have unrestricted diet on the day prior to the exam. Primary outcomes were bowel cleaning success and/or tolerability of colon preparation. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, polyp and adenoma detection rates. Data on intention-totreat were extracted by two independent authors and risk of bias assessed through the Jadad scale. Funnel plots, Egger's test, Higgins' test (I2) and sensitivity analyses were used to assess reporting bias and heterogeneity. The meta-analysis was performed by computing risk difference (RD) using Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method with fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) models. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5) version 6.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration) was the software chosen to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS 662 records were identified but only 16 trials with 6200 subjects were included for the meta-analysis. High heterogeneity among studies was found and sensitivity analysis was needed and performed to interpret data. In the pooled analysis, SPMC was better for bowel cleaning [MH FE, RD 0.03, IC (0.01, 0.05), P = 0.003, I-2 = 33%, NNT 34], for tolerability [MH RE, RD 0.08, IC (0.03, 0.13), P = 0.002, I-2 = 88%, NNT 13] and for adverse events [MH RE, RD 0.13, IC (0.05, 0.22), P = 0.002, I-2 = 88%, NNT 7]. There was no difference in regard to polyp and adenoma detection rates. Additional analyses were made by subgroups (type of regimen, volume of PEG solution and dietary recommendations). SPMC demonstrated better tolerability levels when compared to PEG in the following subgroups: ""day-before preparation"" [MH FE, RD 0.17, IC (0.13, 0.21), P < 0.0001, I-2 = 0%, NNT 6], "" preparation in accordance with time interval for colonoscopy"" [MH RE, RD 0.08, IC (0.01, 0.15), P = 0.02, I-2 = 54%, NNT 13], when compared to ""high-volume PEG solutions"" [MH RE, RD 0.08, IC (0.01, 0.14), I-2 = 89%, P = 0.02, NNT 13] and in the subgroup "" liquid diet on day before"" [MH RE, RD 0.14, IC (0.06,0.22), P = 0.0006, I-2 = 81%, NNT 8]. SPMC was also found to cause fewer adverse events than PEG in the "" high-volume PEG solutions"" [MH RE, RD -0.18, IC (-0.30, -0.07), P = 0.002, I-2 = 79%, NNT 6] and PEG in the "" low-residue diet"" subgroup [MH RE, RD -0.17, IC (-0.27, 0.07), P = 0.0008, I-2 = 86%, NNT 6]. CONCLUSION SPMC seems to be better than PEG for bowel preparation, with a similar bowel cleaning success rate, better tolerability and lower prevalence of adverse events.
  • conferenceObject
    GASTRIC PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (G-POEM) IN THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY GASTROPARESIS: CASE SERIES AND LITERATURE REVIEW
    (2019) PONTE, Alberto M. da; SAGAE, Vitor M.; MORITA, Flavio H.; MATSUBAYASHI, Carolina O.; MINATA, Mauricio K.; MOURA, Eduardo T.; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo G. de; CHAVES, Dalton
  • article
    Carbon dioxide versus air insufflation enteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
    (2018) AQUINO, Julio Cesar Martins; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; MORITA, Flavio Hiroshi Ananias; ROCHA, Rodrigo Silva de Paula; MINATA, Mauricio Kazuyoshi; CORONEL, Martin; RODELA, Gustavo Luis da Silva; ISHIDA, Robson Kiyoshi; KUGA, Rogerio; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de
    Objectives To compare the insufflation of CO2 and ambient air in enteroscopy. Search sources The investigators researched the electronic databases MedLine, Cochrane Library, Central, LILACS, BVS, Scopus and Cinahl. The grey search was conducted in the base of theses of the University of Sao Paulo, books of digestive endoscopy and references of selected articles and in previous systematic revisions. Study eligibility criteria The evaluation of eligibility was performed independently, in a non-blind manner, by two reviewers, firstly by title and abstract, followed by complete text. Disagreements between the reviewers were resolved by consensus. Data collection and analysis method Through the spreadsheet of data extraction, where one author extracted the data and a second author checked the extraction. Disagreements were resolved by debate between the two reviewers. The quality analysis of the studies was performed using the Jadad score. The software RevMan 5 version 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis. Results Four randomized clinical trials were identified, totaling 473 patients submitted to enteroscopy and comparing insufflation of CO2 and ambient air. There was no statistical difference in the intubation depth between the two groups. When CO2 insufflation was reduced, there was a significant difference in pain levels 1 hour after the procedure (95% IC, -2.49 [-4.72, -0.26], P: 0.03, I-2: 20%) and 3 hours after the procedure (95% IC, -3.05 [-5.92, -0.18], P: 0.04, I-2: 0 %). There was a usage of lower propofol dosage in the CO2 insufflation group, with significant difference (95% IC, -67.68 [-115.53, -19.84], P: 0.006, I-2: 0%). There was no significant difference between the groups in relation to the use of pethidine and to the oxygen saturation. Limitations Restricted number of randomized clinical trials and nonuniformity of data were limitations to the analysis of the outcomes. Conclusion The use of CO2 as insufflation gas in enteroscopy reduces the pain levels 1 hour and 3 hours after the procedure, in addition to the reduction of the sedation (propofol) dosage used.
  • conferenceObject
    ENDOSCOPIC VACUUM THERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL POST-MEGASTENT PERFORATION.
    (2018) BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; RICCIOPPO, Daniel; MOURA, Diogo T. de; MINATA, Mauricio K.; MORITA, Flavio Hiroshi A.; ROCHA, Rodrigo S.; FARIAS, Galileu F.; SANTO, Marco Aurelio; MOURA, Eduardo G. de
  • conferenceObject
    Achalasia Treatment With Pneumatic Balloon Dilation (PBD) Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    (2017) BONIFACIO, Priscilla C.; KORKISCHKO, Nadia; PASSOS, Marina L.; MATOS, Mileine V. de; AQUINO, Julio Cesar M.; ROCHA, Rodrigo S.; MORITA, Flavio Hiroshi A.; MINATA, Mauricio K.; MOURA, Eduardo G. de
  • article
    Stents and surgical interventions in the palliation of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review
    (2016) MINATA, Mauricio Kazuyoshi; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; ROCHA, Rodrigo Silva de Paula; MORITA, Flavio Hiroshi Ananias; AQUINO, Julio Cesar Martins; CHENG, Spencer; ZILBERSTEIN, Bruno; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de
    Background and study aims: Palliative treatment of gastric outlet obstruction can be done with surgical or endoscopic techniques. This systematic review aims to compare surgery and covered and uncovered stent treatments for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Patients and methods: Randomized clinical trials were identified in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, LILACs, BVS, SCOPUS and CINAHL databases. Comparison of covered and uncovered stents included: technical success, clinical success, complications, obstruction, migration, bleeding, perforation, stent fracture and reintervention. The outcomes used to compare surgery and stents were technical success, complications, and reintervention. Patency rate could not be included because of lack of uniformity of the extracted data. Results: Eight studies were selected, 3 comparing surgery and stents and 5 comparing covered and uncovered stents.The meta-analysis of surgical and endoscopic stent treatment showed no difference in the technical success and overall number of complications. Stents had higher reintervention rates than surgery (RD: 0.26, 95% CI [0.05, 0.47], NNH: 4). There is no significant difference in technical success, clinical success, complications, stent fractures, perforation, bleeding and the need for reintervention in the analyses of covered and uncovered stents. There is a higher migration rate in the covered stent therapy compared to uncovered self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) in the palliation of malignant GOO (RD: 0.09, 95% CI [0.04, 0.14], NNH: 11). Nevertheless, covered stents had lower obstruction rates (RD: -0.21, 95% CI [-0.27,-0.15], NNT: 5). Conclusions: In the palliation of malignant GOO, covered SEMS had higher migration and lower obstruction rates when compared with uncovered stents. Surgery is associated with lower reintervention rates than stents.