Hemodynamic response in one session of strength exercise with and without electrostimulation in heart failure patients: A randomized controlled trial

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_CARVALHO_Hemodynamic_response_in_one_session_of_strength_exercise_2011.PDF (198.53 KB)
Citações na Scopus
8
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2011
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
VIA MEDICA
Autores
ROQUE, Jean Marcelo
Citação
CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, v.18, n.1, p.39-46, 2011
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Studies have investigated the influence of neuromuscular electrostimulation on the exercise/muscle capacity of patients with heart failure (HF), but the hemodynamic overload has never been investigated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressures in one session of strength exercises with and without neuromuscular electrostimulation (quadriceps) in HF patients and in healthy subjects. Methods: Ten (50% male) HF patients and healthy subjects performed three sets of eight repetitions with and without neuromuscular electrostimulation randomly, with one week between sessions. Throughout, electromyography was performed to guarantee the electrostimulation was effective. The hemodynamic variables were measured at rest, again immediately after the end of each set of exercises, and during the recovery period. Results: Systolic and diastolic blood pressures did not change during each set of exercises among either the HF patients or the controls. Without electrostimulation: among the controls, the HR corresponding to the first (85 +/- 13 bpm, p = 0.002), second (84 +/- 10 bpm, p < 0.001), third (89 +/- 17, p < 0.001) sets and recuperation (83 +/- 16 bpm, p = 0.012) were different compared to the resting HR (77 bpm). Moreover, the recuperation was different to the third set (0.018). Among HF patients, the HR corresponding to the first (84 +/- 9 bpm, p = 0.041) and third (84 +/- 10 bpm, p = 0.036) sets were different compared to the resting HR (80 +/- 7 bpm), but this increase of 4 bpm is clinically irrelevant to HF. With electrostimulation: among the controls, the HR corresponding to the third set (84 +/- 9 bpm) was different compared to the resting HR (80 +/- 7 bmp, p = 0.016). Among HF patients, there were no statistical differences between the sets. The procedure was well tolerated and no subjects reported muscle pain after 24 hours. Conclusions: One session of strength exercises with and without neuromuscular electrostimulation does not promote a hemodynamic overload in HF patients. (Cardiol J 2011; 18,1: 39-46)
Palavras-chave
strength exercise, cardiac rehabilitation, electrostimulation, hemodynamic response
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/22741
Referências
  1. Hermens HJ, 2000, J ELECTROMYOGR KINES, V10, P361, DOI 10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4
  2. Ponikowski P, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P967
  3. CABRIC M, 1987, INT J SPORTS MED, V8, P323, DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1025677
  4. Gitt AK, 2002, CIRCULATION, V106, P3079, DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000041428.99427.06
  5. DREXLER H, 1992, CIRCULATION, V85, P1751
  6. CICCOTTI MG, 1994, AM J SPORT MED, V22, P651, DOI 10.1177/036354659402200513
  7. ADAMOPOULOS S, 1993, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V21, P1101
  8. Harris S, 2003, EUR HEART J, V24, P871, DOI 10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00822-9
  9. Quittan M, 1999, ARTIF ORGANS, V23, P432, DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06372.x
  10. Carvalho VO, 2009, CIRC J, V73, P1871
  11. Perez M, 2002, PFLUG ARCH EUR J PHY, V443, P866, DOI 10.1007/s00424-001-0769-6
  12. SELKOWITZ DM, 1989, AM J SPORT MED, V17, P103, DOI 10.1177/036354658901700118
  13. Bjarnason-Wehrens B, 2004, EUR J CARDIOV PREV R, V11, P352, DOI 10.1097/01.hjr.0000137692.36013.27
  14. Bocchi EA, 2008, INT BRAZ J UROL, V34, P302, DOI 10.1590/S1677-55382008000300007
  15. BOWMAN BR, 1985, ANN BIOMED ENG, V13, P59, DOI 10.1007/BF02371250
  16. CABRIC M, 1988, EUR J APPL PHYSIOL O, V57, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00691229
  17. CABRIC M, 1987, INT J SPORTS MED, V8, P256, DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1025665
  18. CARVALHO VO, 2009, ARQ BRAS CARDIOL, V93, P36
  19. Carvalho VO, 2009, CARDIOL J, V16, P426
  20. COATS AJS, 1994, BRIT HEART J, V72, P36
  21. Guimaraes GV, 2010, CARDIOL J, V17, P143
  22. Guimaraes GV, 2010, INT J CARDIOL, V145, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.05.001
  23. HAINAUT K, 1992, SPORTS MED, V14, P100, DOI 10.2165/00007256-199214020-00003
  24. Haslam D., 1988, J CARDIOPULM REHABIL, V8, P213, DOI 10.1097/00008483-198806000-00002
  25. Heller BM, 2003, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V43, P180
  26. Maillefert J F, 1998, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, V18, P277, DOI 10.1097/00008483-199807000-00004
  27. Vanderthommen M, 2001, Rev Med Liege, V56, P391
  28. Vaquero AF, 1998, INT J SPORTS MED, V19, P317, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-971924

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/InCor
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/11
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41