Clinical Trial Comparing 3 Different Wound Dressings for the Management of Partial-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
21
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2011
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citação
JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, v.38, n.6, p.643-647, 2011
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
PURPOSE: A review of the literature reveals a lack of consensus regarding local management of skin graft donor sites. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of 3 different dressings on healing of donor sites and patient discomfort related to donor sites. DESIGN: This study is a comparison cohort study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: We recruited 34 burn patients scheduled for partial-thickness skin grafts; their mean age was 36 +/- 18 years (mean +/- SD, range 20 to 54 years), and 63% were male. All subjects were managed at Burn Unity Care, located in Sao Paulo, Brazil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: (1) a study group (group A) whose donor sites were dressed with a bovine collagen calcium-alginate dressing covered with transparent polyurethane film; (2) a second intervention group (group B), whose donor sites were dressed only with transparent polyurethane film dressing; and (3) a control group whose donor sites were dressed with rayon soaked in 0.9% saline (group C). Two independent observers assessed donor site wounds for epithelialization, scabbing, quantity and characteristics of exudate, and complications. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, the brief pain inventory, and Index of Pain Management. RESULTS: Subjects managed with the bovine collagen calcium-alginate dressing covered with transparent polyurethane film (group A) achieved the greatest epithelialization (6.3 vs 8.2 for thin film dressing only P < .02 and 6.3 vs 11.7 days for control group P < .01). Patients managed with the bovine collagen calcium-alginate dressing covered with transparent polyurethane film also reported less pain that subjects allocated to the control (group C) or thin film only group (group B), (P < .05). Ninety percent of subjects allocated to the calcium alginate covered with thin film dressing reported mild pain intensity on the Visual Analog Scale, 85% of did not report pain localized to the donor site on the brief pain inventory, and scores on the Index of Pain Management ranged from 23 to 11. CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that use of a collagen calcium-alginate dressing with a transparent film covering reduces the time for complete epithelialization and may reduce pain related to skin graft donor sites.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. LAWRENCE JE, 1991, BRIT J PLAST SURG, V44, P247, DOI 10.1016/0007-1226(91)90065-R
  2. WINTER GD, 1962, NATURE, V193, P293, DOI 10.1038/193293a0
  3. BLAIR SD, 1990, BRIT J SURG, V77, P568, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800770534
  4. NEMETH AJ, 1991, ARCH DERMATOL, V127, P1679, DOI 10.1001/archderm.127.11.1679
  5. de Leon SP, 2004, ARCH MED RES, V35, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.arcmed.2003.07.009
  6. Disa JJ, 2001, ANN PLAS SURG, V46, P405, DOI 10.1097/00000637-200104000-00009
  7. Bailey AJ, 2000, WOUND REPAIR REGEN, V8, P5, DOI 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00005.x
  8. Beam JW, 2007, J ATHL TRAINING, V42, P422
  9. BLAIR SD, 1988, BRIT J SURG, V75, P969, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800751010
  10. FELDMAN DL, 1991, ANN PLAS SURG, V27, P288, DOI 10.1097/00000637-199109000-00017
  11. Griswold John A., 1995, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V16, P136, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199503000-00008
  12. MADDEN MR, 1989, J TRAUMA, V29, P924, DOI 10.1097/00005373-198907000-00004
  13. Martini L, 1999, J Wound Care, V8, P457
  14. PORTER JM, 1991, BRIT J PLAST SURG, V44, P333, DOI 10.1016/0007-1226(91)90144-9
  15. SIRIMANNA KS, 1992, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V17, P237, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1992.tb01834.x
  16. TOLEDO FO, 2008, ADAPTACAO CULTURAL I
  17. WIECHULA, 2003, INT J NURS PRACT, V9, pS9