Could the Less-Than Subtotal Parathyroidectomy Be an Option for Treating Young Patients With Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1-Related Hyperparathyroidism?

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
20
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Citação
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, v.10, article ID 123, 10p, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: The surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) has evolved due the concern of permanent hypoparathyroidism. As the diagnosis has increased, the extent of operation has decreased. Most MEN1 patients requiring parathyroidectomy are younger than 50 years and they pose a difficult balance to achieve between persistent HPT and life-long hypoparathyroidism. The aim of the present study is to review our experience with a large series of patients with MEN1-related HPT (HPT/MEN1) treated at a single institution in order to find clues to a better treatment decision in these younger cases. Method: Retrospective analysis of consecutive HPT/MEN1 cases treated at a single institution with different operations: total parathyroidectomy and immediate forearm autograft (TPTX-AG), subtotal (STPTX), unintentional less than subtotal (U-LSTPTX) and intentional less than subtotal parathyroidectomy (I-LSTPTX). Results: Considering 84 initial cases operated on since 2011 (TPTX-AG, 39; STPTX, 22, U-LSTPTX, 13, and I-LSTPTX, 10), the rates of hypoparathyroidism were 30.8% (U-LSTPTX), 28.2% (TPTX-AG), 13.6% (STPTX), and 0% (I-LSTPTX). Two-thirds of them (68%; 57/84) were young (< 50 years) or asdolescents. MIBI scan was more sensitive to show parathyroid glands and bilateral disease. Considering the concordance of MIBI and ultrasound for the possibility of unilateral clearance, it would be suitable to 22.6% of the cases. Intra-operative parathormone showed a significant decay even after unilateral exploration, but longer follow up is necessary. Overall, there were seven (4%) adolescents in 161 cases treated from 1987 to 2018, three underwent TPTX-AG and four had U-LSTPTX. Five are euparathyroid, one had mild recurrence, and one required a reoperation after 8 years due to the residual gland. Conclusions: Young patients are the most frequent candidates to parathyroidectomy. Less extensive procedures may be planned only if carefully reviewed preoperative imaging studies suggest a localized disease. Patients and their relatives should be fully informed of the risks and benefits during consent process. Future research with larger cohorts and long-term results are necessary to clarify if less than I-LSPTX or unilateral clearance are really adequate in selected groups of patients with HPT/MEN1 presenting lower volume of disease detected by preoperative imaging studies.
Palavras-chave
parathyroidectomy, adolescent, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, surgery, parathormone, calcium
Referências
  1. Agarwal SK, 2013, FRONT HORM RES, V41, P1, DOI 10.1159/000345666
  2. Bilezikian JP, 2014, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V99, P3561, DOI 10.1210/jc.2014-1413
  3. Brandi ML, 2001, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V86, P5658, DOI 10.1210/jc.86.12.5658
  4. Carvalho RA, 2018, EUR J ENDOCRINOL, V179, P391, DOI 10.1530/EJE-18-0430
  5. Montenegro FLD, 2012, CLINICS, V67, P131, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2012(Sup01)22
  6. De Paoli-Iseppi R, 2018, PATHOLOGY, V50, P622, DOI 10.1016/j.pathol.2018.05.006
  7. Dwight T, 2002, AM J PATHOL, V161, P1299, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64406-9
  8. Fyrsten E, 2016, WORLD J SURG, V40, P615, DOI 10.1007/s00268-015-3297-9
  9. Goncalves TD, 2014, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V99, pE89, DOI 10.1210/jc.2013-1768
  10. Goudet P, 2015, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V100, P1568, DOI 10.1210/jc.2014-3659
  11. HELLMAN P, 1992, WORLD J SURG, V16, P718, DOI 10.1007/BF02067367
  12. Hoang JK, 2016, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V155, P956, DOI 10.1177/0194599816655311
  13. Hubbard JGH, 2006, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V141, P235, DOI 10.1001/archsurg.141.3.235
  14. Kluijfhout WP, 2016, WORLD J SURG, V40, P2964, DOI 10.1007/s00268-016-3624-9
  15. Lee CH, 2006, ANN SURG ONCOL, V13, P103, DOI 10.1245/ASO.2006.12.009
  16. Leite AKN, 2014, ARQ BRAS ENDOCRINOL, V58, P313, DOI 10.1590/0004-2730000002850
  17. Lourenco DM, 2008, EUR J ENDOCRINOL, V159, P259, DOI 10.1530/EJE-08-0153
  18. Lourenco DM, 2010, J BONE MINER RES, V25, P2382, DOI 10.1002/jbmr.125
  19. Maeda SS, 2018, ARCH ENDOCRIN METAB, V62, P106, DOI 10.20945/2359-3997000000015
  20. Marini F, 2018, FRONT ENDOCRINOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fendo.2018.00597
  21. Marx SJ, 2018, FRONT ENDOCRINOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fendo.2018.00359
  22. Montenegro FLM, 2008, REV BRAS CIR CABECA, V37, P71
  23. Moosvi SR, 2017, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V99, P363, DOI 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0014
  24. Muniz Lourenco D, 2007, CLINICS, V62, P465, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322007000400014
  25. Nascimento Júnior Climério Pereira do, 2017, J. Bras. Nefrol., V39, P135, DOI 10.5935/0101-2800.20170021
  26. Nilubol N, 2016, ANN SURG ONCOL, V23, P416, DOI 10.1245/s10434-015-4865-9
  27. Nilubol N, 2013, WORLD J SURG, V37, P1966, DOI 10.1007/s00268-013-2054-1
  28. Barreira CESR, 2011, WORLD J SURG, V35, P2440, DOI 10.1007/s00268-011-1261-x
  29. Schreinemakers JMJ, 2011, WORLD J SURG, V35, P1993, DOI 10.1007/s00268-011-1068-9
  30. Thakker RV, 2012, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V97, P2990, DOI 10.1210/jc.2012-1230
  31. Toledo RA, 2007, CLIN ENDOCRINOL, V67, P377, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02895.x
  32. Toneili F, 2018, FRONT ENDOCRINOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fendo.2018.00558
  33. Tonelli F, 2012, CLINICS, V67, P155, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2012(Sup01)26
  34. Vannucci L, 2018, ENDOCRINE, V59, P438, DOI 10.1007/s12020-017-1322-5
  35. Versnick M, 2013, SURGERY, V154, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.004
  36. WELLS SA, 1978, SURG CLIN N AM, V58, P391
  37. Westerdahl J, 2006, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V141, P589, DOI 10.1001/archsurg.141.6.589