Immunoreactivity of proteins within 30-40 kDa range during the acute and the recovery phases in rats experimentally infected with Strongyloides venezuelensis

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
INST MEDICINA TROPICAL SAO PAULO
Citação
REVISTA DO INSTITUTO DE MEDICINA TROPICAL DE SAO PAULO, v.62, article ID e23, 5p, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
In experimental infection with Strongyloides venezuelensis, the acute and recovery phases can be distinguished, unlike human infections caused by Strongyloides stercoralis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the production of anti-Strongyloides IgG antibodies and the recognition of immunogenic protein bands during the acute and the recovery phases in rats experimentally infected with S. venezuelensis. Rats were infected subcutaneously with 400 or 4,000 S. venezuelensis infective larvae. The acute phase was characterized by elimination of a large number of eggs in the faeces on days 6-14 post infection; the recovery phase was characterized by the resolution of the infection between days 30 and 35 post infection. Differences in IgG levels were observed in the acute and the recovery phases. Different antigenic fractions were recognized in both phases of infection. It is concluded that proteins within the 30-40 kDa range are immunoreactive markers for both the acute and the recovery phases in rats experimentally infected with S. venezuelensis, particularly using membrane antigen.
Palavras-chave
Strongyloides venezuelensis, Acute and recovery phases, 30-40 kDa, IgG
Referências
  1. Amarante AFT, 2001, REV BRAS PARASITOL V, V10, P1
  2. Chiuso-Minicucci F, 2010, PARASITE IMMUNOL, V32, P74, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01160.x
  3. Corral MA, 2017, PARASITOLOGY, V144, P124, DOI 10.1017/S0031182016001645
  4. de Sousa JEN, 2016, PARASITOL INT, V65, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.parint.2015.11.005
  5. Goncalves ALR, 2012, EXP PARASITOL, V130, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.01.007
  6. Gordon H. McL., 1939, Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research Australia, V12, P50
  7. de Carvalho EFG, 2015, EXP PARASITOL, V157, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.exppara.2015.07.009
  8. Levenhagen MA, 2014, ACTA TROP, V135, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.03.015
  9. Marques PD, 2016, J HELMINTHOL, V90, P422, DOI 10.1017/S0022149X15000528
  10. Marra NM, 2010, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V105, P57, DOI 10.1590/S0074-02762010000100008
  11. Rodpai R, 2016, PARASITOL RES, V115, P4007, DOI 10.1007/s00436-016-5170-7
  12. Rodrigues RM, 2004, MEM I OSWALDO CRUZ, V99, P89, DOI 10.1590/S0074-02762004000100016
  13. Rodrigues RM, 2013, EXP PARASITOL, V135, P580, DOI 10.1016/j.exppara.2013.09.004
  14. Sudre AP, 2007, PARASITOL RES, V101, P1117, DOI 10.1007/s00436-007-0596-6
  15. Viney M, 2017, PARASITOLOGY, V144, P285, DOI 10.1017/S0031182016000020