Effects of diazoxide in experimental acute necrotizing pancreatitis

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Citação
CLINICS, v.72, n.2, p.125-129, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the effects of diazoxide on the mortality, pancreatic injury, and inflammatory response in an experimental model of acute pancreatitis. METHODS: Male Wistar rats (200-400 g) were divided randomly into two groups. Fifteen minutes before surgery, animals received physiological (0.9%) saline (3 mL/kg) (control group) or 45 mg/kg diazoxide (treatment group) via the intravenous route. Acute pancreatitis was induced by injection of 2.5% sodium taurocholate via the biliopancreatic duct. Mortality (n= 38) was observed for 72 h and analyzed by the Mantel-Cox Log-rank test. To study pancreatic lesions and systemic inflammation, rats (10 from each group) were killed 3 h after acute pancreatitis induction; ascites volume was measured and blood as well as pancreases were collected. Pancreatic injury was assessed according to Schmidt's scale. Cytokine expression in plasma was evaluated by the multiplex method. RESULTS: Mortality at 72 h was 33% in the control group and 60% in the treatment group (p = 0.07). Ascites volumes and plasma levels of cytokines between groups were similar. No difference was observed in edema or infiltration of inflammatory cells in pancreatic tissues from either group. However, necrosis of acinar cells was lower in the treatment group compared to the control group (3.5 vs. 3.75, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with diazoxide can reduce necrosis of acinar cells in an experimental model of acute pancreatitis, but does not affect the inflammatory response or mortality after 72 h.
Palavras-chave
Pancreatitis, Diazoxide, Rats
Referências
  1. Banks PA, 2016, PANCREAS, V45, P633, DOI 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000632
  2. Banks PA, 2013, GUT, V62, P102, DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779
  3. Bhosale G, 2015, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1350, P107, DOI 10.1111/nyas.12885
  4. Gukovsky I, 2012, J GASTROEN HEPATOL, V27, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.07004.x
  5. Gurusamy KS, 2016, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V4, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD011383.pub2
  6. Iwai T, 2000, BRIT J PHARMACOL, V129, P1219, DOI 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703148
  7. Lankisch PG, 2015, LANCET, V386, P85, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60649-8
  8. Llimona F, 2014, INFLAMMATION, V37, P1231, DOI 10.1007/s10753-014-9850-0
  9. Ma C, 2012, MOL MED REP, V6, P57, DOI 10.3892/mmr.2012.881
  10. Menozzi A, 2011, EUR J PHARMACOL, V650, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.09.078
  11. Minkov GA, 2015, PANCREAS, V44, P713, DOI 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000329
  12. Mukherjee R, 2016, GUT, V65, P1333, DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308553
  13. Murphy E, 2008, PHYSIOL REV, V88, P581, DOI 10.1152/physrev.00024.2007
  14. Murphy E, 2008, PHYSIOLOGY, V23, P115, DOI 10.1152/physiol.00044.2007
  15. Nagy K, 2004, J NEUROSCI RES, V76, P697, DOI 10.1002/jnr.20120
  16. Rahgozar M, 2001, J GASTROEN HEPATOL, V16, P290, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2001.02433.x
  17. Rios ECS, 2010, CLIN EXP PHARMACOL P, V37, P35, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05220.x
  18. SCHMIDT J, 1992, INT J PANCREATOL, V12, P41
  19. SCHMIDT J, 1992, ANN SURG, V215, P44
  20. Moretti AIS, 2009, PANCREAS, V38, P507, DOI 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31819fef75
  21. van Acker GJD, 2006, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V12, P1985
  22. Vanlangenakker N, 2008, CURR MOL MED, V8, P207, DOI 10.2174/156652408784221306
  23. Virgili N, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0075189
  24. Wang X, 2004, SHOCK, V22, P23, DOI 10.1097/01.shk.0000129200.30965.57
  25. Wu BU, 2011, CLIN GASTROENTEROL H, V9, P710, DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.026