Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative setting

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citação
CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, v.29, n.3, p.268-274, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose of reviewThe aim of this study was to review the role of haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative setting, highlighting who are the patients who most benefit, to describe the type of devices, to analyse the scientific evidence and to suggest algorithms of haemodynamic care in high-risk surgical patients.Recent findingsIn the last 50 years, many advances have contributed to better understand cardiovascular physiology at bedside, and haemodynamic monitoring has moved from invasive methods to minimally invasive and noninvasive devices. Randomized clinical trials have shown benefits of perioperative haemodynamic therapy to improve outcomes in high-risk surgical patients. A multimodal approach is purposed in the perioperative setting to optimize haemodynamic parameters, involving clinical analysis at bedside, the use of dynamic tests for fluid responsiveness and integration of variables, including cardiac output, systolic volume, tissue oxygen markers and echocardiographic measures.In this review, we summarize the benefits of haemodynamic monitoring, the type of devices with advantages and disadvantages, the scientific evidence supporting perioperative haemodynamic therapy, and we suggest a multimodal approach to improve patients' care.
Palavras-chave
haemodynamic monitoring, high surgical risk patients, perioperative haemodynamic therapy
Referências
  1. Alhashemi JA, 2011, CRIT CARE, V15, DOI 10.1186/cc9996
  2. Arya VK, 2022, CURR OPIN CRIT CARE, V28, P340, DOI 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000937
  3. Biccard BM, 2018, LANCET, V391, P1589, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30001-1, 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30001-1]
  4. Brady K, 2013, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V119, P495, DOI 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10cce
  5. Calvo-Vecino JM, 2018, BRIT J ANAESTH, V120, P734, DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.018
  6. Cannesson M, 2011, CRIT CARE, V15, DOI 10.1186/cc10364
  7. Dahmani S, 2019, ANAESTH CRIT CARE PA, V38, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.accpm.2019.04.005
  8. Edwards MR, 2019, BMJ OPEN, V9, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023455
  9. Govinda R, 2010, ANESTH ANALG, V111, P946, DOI 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e80a94
  10. Holland J, 2005, AM J SURG, V190, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.038
  11. Jessen MK, 2022, BRIT J ANAESTH, V128, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.046
  12. JONSSON K, 1991, ANN SURG, V214, P605, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199111000-00011
  13. Gerent ARM, 2018, CRIT CARE, V22, DOI 10.1186/s13054-018-2055-4
  14. Osawa EA, 2016, CRIT CARE MED, V44, P724, DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001479
  15. Pearse RM, 2011, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V343, DOI 10.1136/bmj.d5759
  16. Pearse RM, 2012, LANCET, V380, P1059, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61148-9
  17. Pinsky MR, 2022, CRIT CARE, V26, DOI 10.1186/s13054-022-04173-z
  18. Saugel B, 2015, BRIT J ANAESTH, V114, P562, DOI 10.1093/bja/aeu447
  19. Saugel B, 2021, BRIT J ANAESTH, V126, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.049
  20. Saugel B, 2019, BRIT J ANAESTH, V123, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.048
  21. Saugel B, 2017, CURR OPIN CRIT CARE, V23, P334, DOI 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000422
  22. Sessler DI, 2018, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V128, P317, DOI 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001985
  23. Shoemaker WC, 1999, WORLD J SURG, V23, P1264, DOI 10.1007/s002689900660
  24. Sun YX, 2017, CRIT CARE, V21, DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1728-8
  25. Thiele RH, 2015, CRIT CARE MED, V43, P177, DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000608
  26. Wan YI, 2021, BRIT J SURG, V108, P220, DOI 10.1093/bjs/znaa075
  27. Weiser TG, 2015, LANCET, V385, P11, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60806-6