Balance highly influences flexibility measured by the toe-touch test

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Citação
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, v.62, p.116-123, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Flexibility evaluation is a standard assessment in clinical and in sports settings. The Toe-touch test (TTT) is a common assessment tool to evaluate posterior muscular chain flexibility, but the test procedure implies a balance demand. The objective of the study was to verify the hypothesis that the balance demand during the TTT may affect the flexibility measured by the test. Twenty healthy, active young adults participated in the present study. Toe-touch test outcome (the linear finger to toe distance), Center of Pressure (CP) and sagittal plane joint angles were compared under two balance conditions: (1) standard TTT (ST) and (2) minimised postural demand (MPD) during ITT (using a device that restrained the participant against a forward fall). Then, ST was re-tested to verify a possible effect of motor learning on ITT outcome. Compared to ST, MPD showed an improvement of 73% in test outcome, greater flexion of the ankle, greater total body flexion, and a forward displacement of the CP. Re-test of ST showed indications of motor learning with a different balance strategy compared to the first trial in the same condition. The test outcome showed significant negative correlations with CP position in ST (weak correlation), in the re-test (strong correlation) and when the conditions were combined (moderate correlation). In conclusion, ITT outcome was highly affected by balance performance. Maximum range of motion during ST was a fraction of the range obtained when balance demand was minimized.
Palavras-chave
Flexibility, Postural balance, Kinetics, Hamstring tightness
Referências
  1. Bolivar YA, 2013, FOOT ANKLE INT, V34, P42, DOI 10.1177/1071100712459173
  2. Ayala F, 2013, PHYS THER SPORT, V14, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.03.013
  3. Ayala F, 2012, PHYS THER SPORT, V13, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.11.001
  4. Ayala F, 2010, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V50, P428
  5. Ayala F, 2012, J SCI MED SPORT, V15, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.10.002
  6. Ayala F, 2010, J STRENGTH COND RES, V24, P430, DOI 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c0674f
  7. Bonetti F, 2010, BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-285
  8. Decoster LC, 2005, J ORTHOP SPORT PHYS, V35, P377, DOI 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.6.377
  9. Kanthack TFD, 2017, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V331, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.004
  10. Ekedahl H, 2012, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V93, P2210, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.020
  11. Gagnon S., 2009, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, V52, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.rehab.2008.10.001
  12. Gruber M, 2007, J MOTOR BEHAV, V39, P68, DOI 10.3200/JMBR.39.1.68-78
  13. Hall LM, 2010, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V103, P968, DOI 10.1152/jn.00479.2009
  14. Holm I, 2014, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, DOI [10.1016/j.apmr.2014.02.016, DOI 10.1016/LAPMR.2014.02.016]
  15. Hopkins WG, 2009, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V41, P3, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278
  16. Horak FB, 2006, AGE AGEING, V35, P7, DOI 10.1093/ageing/afl077
  17. HORAK FB, 1986, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V55, P1369
  18. HORAK FB, 1989, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V62, P841
  19. KIPPERS V, 1987, PHYS THER, V67, P1680, DOI 10.1093/ptj/67.11.1680
  20. LaRoche DP, 2006, AM J SPORT MED, V34, P1000, DOI 10.1177/0363546505284238
  21. Meunier S, 1999, J PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS, V93, P387, DOI 10.1016/S0928-4257(00)80066-2
  22. Perret C, 2001, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V82, P1566, DOI 10.1053/apmr.2001.26064
  23. Pollock AS, 2000, CLIN REHABIL, V14, P402, DOI 10.1191/0269215500cr342oa
  24. Robinson HS, 2014, SPINE, V39, pE270, DOI 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000131
  25. de Baranda PS, 2010, INT J SPORTS MED, V31, P389, DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1249082
  26. de Baranda PS, 2014, CLIN J SPORT MED, V24, P320, DOI 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000079
  27. Taube W, 2008, ACTA PHYSIOL, V193, P101, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2008.01850.x
  28. Van Ooteghem K, 2009, EXP BRAIN RES, V199, P185, DOI 10.1007/s00221-009-1995-y
  29. Winter DA, 2001, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V85, P2630
  30. Winter DA, 2003, J ELECTROMYOGR KINES, V13, P49, DOI 10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00085-8
  31. Winter DA, 2009, BIOMECHANICS MOTOR C
  32. Witvrouw E, 2003, AM J SPORT MED, V31, P41, DOI 10.1177/03635465030310011801
  33. Witvrouw E, 2001, AM J SPORT MED, V29, P190, DOI 10.1177/03635465010290021201
  34. Witvrouw E, 2000, AM J SPORT MED, V28, P480, DOI 10.1177/03635465000280040701