Demographics and serological profile of blood donors who opt for the confidential unit exclusion in a blood bank in Sao Paulo, Brazil

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
INST MEDICINA TROPICAL SAO PAULO
Autores
DELATORRE, Marcella Vizcaya Val
BATALHA, Kalyne M.
SANTOS, Leandro Dinalli
BONET-BUB, Carolina
Citação
REVISTA DO INSTITUTO DE MEDICINA TROPICAL DE SAO PAULO, v.63, article ID e69, 6p, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Blood transfusion is still an irreplaceable therapeutic modality, widely applied to medical care. Clinical interviews and laboratory testing for transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI) are routinely performed to prevent TTI among the recipients. However, there is still a residual risk of TTI, and some blood banks have adopted the confidential unit exclusion (CUE) as an additional safety strategy. In this study, we investigated the demographic characteristics and laboratory results of the screening of TTI among blood donors who opted for the CUE, compared to blood donors who did not opt for the CUE. In this study, we included 32,261 blood donations collected in a single blood bank in Sao Paulo, Brazil. A very small proportion of donors (0.25%) opted for the CUE. They were mainly single males and were more likely to have HBV, syphilis, and other positive results in the combined screening for TTI, in comparison with those who did not opt for the CUE. This difference was statistically significant in both the univariable and the multivariable analysis adjusted for age, gender , marital status and years of schooling. Our findings highlight that CUE may be a useful tool to improve the safety for blood recipients, but its efficiency is context-dependent.
Palavras-chave
Blood donors, Transfusion, Screening, Confidential unit exclusion, Transfusion-transmitted infections
Referências
  1. Allain JP, 2011, BRIT J HAEMATOL, V154, P763, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08708.x
  2. American Red Cross, IMP BLOOD SUPPL
  3. Brasil. Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria, 2014, DIR COL RES RDC 34 1
  4. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude, 2018, SECR AT SAUD DEP AT
  5. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude, 1993, GAB MIN PORT 1376 NO
  6. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude, 2016, GAB MIN PORT 158 4 F
  7. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude. Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria, 2004, DIR COL RES RDC 153
  8. de Almeida-Neto C, 2011, TRANSFUSION, V51, P191, DOI 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02799.x
  9. de Kort W, 2019, TRANSFUSION, V59, P242, DOI 10.1111/trf.14984
  10. Eder Anne, 2011, Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter., V33, P330, DOI 10.5581/1516-8484.20110091
  11. European Commission Directorate General for Health and Food Safety, DIR GEN HLTH FOOD SA
  12. Flausino GF, 2015, REV MED MINAS GERAIS, V25, P258
  13. Goncalez TT, 2019, TRANSFUSION, V59, P2334, DOI 10.1111/trf.15286
  14. JULLIEN AM, 1988, LANCET, V2, P1248
  15. McFarland W, 1998, TRANSFUSION, V38, P279, DOI 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38398222872.x
  16. O'Brien SF, 2008, VOX SANG, V94, P329, DOI 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.01034.x
  17. O'Brien SF, 2010, VOX SANG, V98, P138, DOI 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01236.x
  18. O'Brien SF, 2010, TRANSFUSION MED, V20, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2009.00969.x
  19. PETERSEN LR, 1991, TRANSFUSION, V31, P698, DOI 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1991.31892023493.x
  20. Pinho AM, 2001, TRIAGEM CLINICA DOAD
  21. Rad F, 2019, TRANSFUS CLIN BIOL, V26, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.tracli.2019.05.002
  22. Sabino EC, 2012, TRANSFUSION, V52, P870, DOI 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03344.x
  23. Sauvage C, 2020, TRANSFUSION, V60, P73, DOI 10.1111/trf.15623
  24. Sumnig A, 2010, VOX SANG, V98, pe231, DOI 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01250.x