Outcomes of Immediate Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator Flap Reconstruction for Irradiated Abdominoperineal Resection Defects

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
12
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citação
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, v.60, n.9, p.945-953, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BACKGROUND: There are many previous reports for using the internal pudendal artery perforator flap in vulvovaginal reconstruction; however, reports of this flap for perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of immediate internal pudendal artery perforator flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. DESIGN: This was a prospective case series. SETTINGS: This flap could represent a step forward over other perineal flap approaches or primary closure. PATIENTS: A total of 73 consecutive patients with anorectal tumors were included. INTERVENTIONS: The study included immediate perineal reconstruction using 122 internal pudendal artery perforator flaps after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dimensions of the perineal defect (in centimeters squared), hospital stay (days), healing time (days), and postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grades) were measured. RESULTS: The means of the perineal defect, hospital stay, and healing time were 51.62 cm(2), 15.94 days, and 38.52 days. The higher the patient BMI, the longer healing time (p = 0.02); Clavien-Dindo complications grades III to IV were greater in patients with perineal defect >= 60 cm(2) (p = 0.03; OR = 10.56); postoperative complications were higher both in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.005; OR = 6.09) and in patients with comorbidities (p = 0.04; OR = 2.78); hospital stay (p = 0.001) and healing time (p < 0.001) were higher in patients who had postoperative complications. The complete perineal wound healing at 12 weeks was achieved by 95% of patients, and our 30-day mortality rate was 4%. LIMITATIONS: As a nonrandomized study, our results have to be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple previously described advantages associated with internal pudendal artery perforator flap were also observed here, reinforcing the idea that it is reliable, versatile, and a useful option for perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Therefore, we propose that this flap could be considered as the first choice for perineal reconstruction in selected patients with moderate and some large defects after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A367.
Palavras-chave
Anus neoplasms, Perforator flap, Perineum, Reconstruction, Rectal neoplasms
Referências
  1. Anderin C, 2012, COLORECTAL DIS, V14, P1060, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02848.x
  2. Barker T, 2013, COLORECTAL DIS, V15, P1177, DOI 10.1111/codi.12286
  3. Buchel EW, 2004, ANN PLAS SURG, V52, P22, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000099820.10065.2a
  4. Bullard KM, 2005, DIS COLON RECTUM, V48, P438, DOI 10.1007/s10350-004-0827-1
  5. Butler CE, 2005, ANN SURG ONCOL, V12, P91, DOI 10.1245/ASO.2005.11.923
  6. Butler CE, 2008, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V206, P694, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.007
  7. Campos FG, 2012, DIS COLON RECTUM, V55, P844, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825ab0f7
  8. Chessin DB, 2005, ANN SURG ONCOL, V12, P104, DOI 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.100
  9. Coltro PS, 2015, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V68, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.09.049
  10. Crosby MA, 2011, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V127, P663, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed5f3
  11. Daramola Opeyemi O, 2011, Virtual Mentor, V13, P46, DOI 10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.1.pfor2-1101
  12. Davidge KM, 2014, ANN SURG ONCOL, V21, P2068, DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-3529-5
  13. Dindo D, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P205, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  14. Ferenschild FTJ, 2005, WORLD J SURG, V29, P1452, DOI 10.1007/s00268-005-7957-z
  15. Franchelli S, 2009, GYNECOL ONCOL, V113, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.017
  16. Giraldo F, 2003, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V111, P1249, DOI 10.1097/01.PRS.0000046036.29786.F4
  17. HAGERTY RC, 1988, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V82, P344, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198808000-00025
  18. Hashimoto I, 2001, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V108, P1998, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200112000-00025
  19. Hashimoto Ichiro, 2001, Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica, V78, P23
  20. Hashimoto I, 2014, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V133, P924, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000008
  21. John HE, 2013, ANN PLAS SURG, V71, P96, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182414485
  22. Lee JH, 2013, ANN PLAS SURG, V71, P571, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824f23e4
  23. Lee PK, 2006, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V118, P401, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000227683.47836.28
  24. Lefevre JH, 2009, ANN SURG, V250, P707, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bce334
  25. Niranjan NS, 2006, SEMIN PLAST SURG, V20, P133, DOI 10.1055/s-2006-941721
  26. Nisar PJ, 2009, COLORECTAL DIS, V11, P806, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01743.x
  27. Pantelides NM, 2013, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V66, P812, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.02.010
  28. Persichetti P, 2007, ANN PLAS SURG, V59, P168, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000252693.53692.e0
  29. Petrie N, 2009, INT J COLORECTAL DIS, V24, P97, DOI 10.1007/s00384-008-0557-2
  30. Ragoowansi R, 2004, BRIT J PLAST SURG, V57, P406, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.02.022
  31. Sawada M, 2004, GYNECOL ONCOL, V95, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.038
  32. Sinna R, 2010, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V63, pE766, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.07.012
  33. Sinna R, 2010, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V63, P1740, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.02.029
  34. Sunesen KG, 2009, ANN SURG ONCOL, V16, P68, DOI 10.1245/s10434-008-0208-4
  35. Tei TM, 2003, BRIT J SURG, V90, P575, DOI 10.1002/bjs.4073
  36. van der Meer JG, 2014, COLORECTAL DIS, V16, pO220, DOI 10.1111/codi.12511
  37. WEE JTK, 1989, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V83, P701, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198904000-00018
  38. Windhofer C, 2011, SURGERY, V149, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.040
  39. Winterton RIS, 2013, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V66, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.09.026
  40. Yii NW, 1996, BRIT J PLAST SURG, V49, P547, DOI 10.1016/S0007-1226(96)90132-0