Parental attitudes and beliefs about sexuality of individuals with intellectual disability: Insights from a Brazilian sample of parents of individuals with Williams syndrome

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MONTEIRO_Parental_attitudes_and_beliefs_about_sexuality_of_individuals_2023.PDF (987.6 KB)
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY
Autores
MONTEIRO, Rebeca Orselli
TAFLA, Tally Lichtensztejn
RODRIGUEZ, Juliana Dalla Martha
TEIXEIRA, Sabine Triguero
TEIXEIRA, Maria Cristina Triguero Veloz
Citação
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, v.36, n.6, p.1345-1353, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BackgroundThe affective expression of sexual behaviour in individuals with Williams syndrome can lead to risky behaviours, especially if parents do not have information on how to provide sex education or support from specialised professionals.MethodThe Attitudes to Sexuality Questionnaire for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities was used to identify parental beliefs, attitudes and concerns about the sexuality and sex education of individuals with intellectual disabilities. The sample comprised 35 parents of individuals with Williams syndrome (mean age 12.8 years (SD = 4.5), 57.1% male).ResultsParents believe in the possibility of marriage and sexual relationships for individuals with intellectual disability when they are older and agree with sexual reproduction in adulthood. Parents consider that sex education, in addition to parental guidance, should be provided by professionals.ConclusionsThis data highlights the need for parents to have clear guidelines on interventions in respect of the sexuality of individuals with intellectual disability.
Palavras-chave
attitudes, belief, parents, sex education, sexuality, Williams syndrome
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/57482
Referências
  1. Arstein-Kerslake A, 2015, DISABIL SOC, V30, P1459, DOI 10.1080/09687599.2015.1116059
  2. Associacao Brasileira De Empresas De Pesquisa (ABEP), 2016, CRIT CLASS EC BRAS
  3. Baines S, 2018, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5572-9
  4. Bastos Olga Maria, 2012, Physis, V22, P1031, DOI 10.1590/S0103-73312012000300010
  5. Bloom TL, 2017, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V21, P1606, DOI 10.1007/s10995-016-2250-3
  6. Borawska-Charko M, 2017, SEX RES SOC POLICY, V14, P393, DOI 10.1007/s13178-016-0267-4
  7. Brkic-jovanovic N, 2021, ZDRAV VARST, V60, P82, DOI 10.2478/sjph-2021-0013
  8. Osório AAC, 2019, INT J DEV DISABIL, V65, P82, DOI 10.1080/20473869.2017.1376163
  9. Cale K., 2008, THESIS I SUPERIOR PS
  10. Carter A, 2022, SEX RES SOC POLICY, V19, P372, DOI 10.1007/s13178-021-00549-y
  11. Chou YC, 2015, WOMEN HEALTH, V55, P663, DOI 10.1080/03630242.2015.1039183
  12. Curtiss SL, 2021, SEX DISABIL, V39, P751, DOI 10.1007/s11195-021-09703-1
  13. Cuskelly M, 2004, J INTELLECT DEV DIS, V29, P255, DOI 10.1080/13668250412331285136
  14. de Wit W, 2022, J APPL RES INTELLECT, V35, P75, DOI 10.1111/jar.12928
  15. Evans DS, 2009, J INTELL DISABIL RES, V53, P913, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01202.x
  16. Fisher MH, 2017, RES DEV DISABIL, V71, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.10.008
  17. Gartrell A, 2017, REPROD HEALTH MATTER, V25, P31, DOI 10.1080/09688080.2017.1332447
  18. Gil-Llario MD, 2018, J INTELL DISABIL RES, V62, P72, DOI 10.1111/jir.12455
  19. Gil-Llario MD, 2022, J APPL RES INTELLECT, V35, P988, DOI 10.1111/jar.12909
  20. Goncalves J. P., 2020, REV EXITUS, V10
  21. Greenwood Nechama W, 2013, Int J Family Med, V2013, P642472, DOI 10.1155/2013/642472
  22. Horner-Johnson W, 2020, PERSPECT SEX REPRO H, V52, P31, DOI 10.1363/psrh.12130
  23. Järvinen A, 2013, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V23, P414, DOI 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.006
  24. Kramers-Olen A, 2017, S AFR J PSYCHOL, V47, P367, DOI 10.1177/0081246317726457
  25. Matin BK, 2021, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-12027-6
  26. McCann E, 2019, HEALTH EDUC J, V78, P885, DOI 10.1177/0017896919856047
  27. Morris CA, 2020, PEDIATRICS, V145, DOI 10.1542/peds.2019-3761
  28. OHCHR UN Women UNAIDS UNDP UNFPA UNICEF and WHO, 2014, Eliminating forced, coercive and otherwise involuntary sterilization
  29. Paulauskaite L, 2022, J INTELL DISABIL RES, V66, P577, DOI 10.1111/jir.12952
  30. Pérez-Curiel P, 2023, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20021587
  31. Phasha TN, 2017, SEX DISABIL, V35, P353, DOI 10.1007/s11195-017-9480-1
  32. Plaks M, 2010, ISR J PSYCHIATR REL, V47, P28
  33. Pownall JD, 2012, INTELLECT DEV DISAB, V50, P140, DOI 10.1352/1934-9556-50.2.140
  34. Reilly PR, 2015, ANNU REV GENOM HUM G, V16, P351, DOI 10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-024930
  35. Ridley E, 2020, RES DEV DISABIL, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103604
  36. Rushbrooke E, 2014, J APPL RES INTELLECT, V27, P531, DOI 10.1111/jar.12091
  37. Tanabe M, 2015, SEX DISABIL, V33, P411, DOI 10.1007/s11195-015-9419-3
  38. Teixeira M. C. T. V., 2016, PSICOLOGIA TEORIA PR, V18, P178
  39. Tilley E, 2012, DISABIL SOC, V27, P413, DOI 10.1080/09687599.2012.654991
  40. Watson S., 2002, ETHICAL DILEMMAS SEX, P175
  41. Concha AY, 2019, GAC SANIT, V33, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.08.008

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MPE
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICr
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/03
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/36
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/05