Impact of Fat Graft Thickness and Harvesting Technique on Adipocyte Viability in a New Porcine Experimental Model: An Immunohistochemical Analysis
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
9
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
Autores
ARRUDA, Eduardo Gustavo Pires de
MUNHOZ, Alexandre Mendonca
MATSUMOTO, Walter
COUDRY, Renata de Almeida
CASTRO, Isac de
Citação
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, v.41, n.6, p.NP616-NP630, 2021
Resumo
Background: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) has been employed in surgical practice as a filling method. However, controversies remain on the specifics of this technique. So far, few relevant experimental large animal studies have objectively assessed factors related to AFG integration. Objectives: This study utilized an experimental, medium-sized animal model to compare the feasibility of AFG collected employing 2 different techniques with instruments of distinct thicknesses. Methods: Twenty minipigs (Sus scropha domesticus) were subjected to AFG harvesting via en bloc resection utilizing 3-(Group I) and 5-mm-diameter (Group II) round punch blades (PBs) and liposuction (LS) with 3- (Group III) and 5-mm-diameter cannulas (Group IV). Both samples were grafted intramuscularly (biceps femoralis). Hematoxylin and eosin staining was employed to identify intact adipocytes, fat necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, and oil cysts. Immunohistochemical staining (perilipin-A, tumor necrosis factor alfa, and cluster of differentiation number 31) was utilized to quantify the feasibility of adipocytes, tissue necrosis, and neoangiogenesis, respectively. Results: Hematoxylin and eosin analysis showed that fat necrosis and histiocyte presence were significantly lower in the AFG harvested utilizing a PB than in LS. For perilipin-A, a statistical difference was observed between subgroups I and III (P = 0.001) and I and IV (P = 0.004). Instrument diameter had no effect on graft integration in comparisons between groups II and III (P = 0.059) and II and IV (P = 0.132). Conclusions: In this experimental study, fat collected utilizing a PB demonstrated higher adipocyte viability than fat collected with LS. The diameter of the collection instruments, whether PB or LS, had no effect on graft integration.
Palavras-chave
Referências
- BILLINGS E, 1989, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V83, P368, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198902000-00033
- BIRCOLL M, 1987, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V79, P267, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198702000-00022
- Borrelli MR, 2019, ANN PLAS SURG, V83, pS59, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002098
- Boschert MT, 2002, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V109, P761, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200202000-00054
- CARPANEDA CA, 1994, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V18, P17, DOI 10.1007/BF00444242
- Chajchir A, 1996, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V20, P291, DOI 10.1007/BF00228458
- Cinti S, 2005, J LIPID RES, V46, P2347, DOI 10.1194/jlr.M500294-JLR200
- Coleman S R, 1998, Aesthet Surg J, V18, P388, DOI 10.1016/S1090-820X(98)70098-6
- Coleman SR, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V119, P775, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000252001.59162.c9
- Czerny A, 1895, CHIR K VERHANDL, V2, P216
- DANTZER R, 1986, LAB ANIM SCI, V36, P362
- Del Vecchio D, 2012, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V130, P511, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825dbf8a
- Delay E, 2009, AESTHET SURG J, V29, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.asj.2009.08.010
- DeLisser HM, 1997, AM J PATHOL, V151, P671
- Erdim M, 2009, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V62, P1210, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.03.016
- Eto H, 2012, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V129, P1081, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2b19
- Fagrell D, 1996, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V98, P90, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199607000-00014
- Findlay MW, 2011, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V128, P1206, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c5b2
- Fu Bing-Chuan, 2010, Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi, V26, P289
- Fujimaki H, 2019, REGEN THER, V11, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.reth.2019.08.004
- Garza RM, 2015, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V135, P1045, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001104
- Gause TM, 2014, ADIPOCYTE, V3, P273, DOI 10.4161/21623945.2014.957987
- Gir P, 2012, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V130, P249, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b4d3
- Guerrerosantos J, 1996, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V20, P403, DOI 10.1007/BF02390315
- Gutowski KA, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V124, P272, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a09506
- Hoerst K, 2019, J MOL MED, V97, P761, DOI 10.1007/s00109-019-01772-2
- Hong KY, 2018, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V141, P365, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004021
- HORL HW, 1991, ANN PLAS SURG, V26, P248
- HUGHES HC, 1986, LAB ANIM SCI, V36, P348
- Huss FRM, 2002, SCAND J PLAST RECONS, V36, P166, DOI 10.1080/028443102753718050
- Idriss HT, 2000, MICROSC RES TECHNIQ, V50, P184, DOI 10.1002/1097-0029(20000801)50:3<184::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-H
- ILLOUZ YG, 1983, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V72, P591, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198311000-00001
- ILLOUZ YG, 1988, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V12, P175, DOI 10.1007/BF01570929
- Ilmonen S, 1999, MELANOMA RES, V9, P273
- International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, ISAPS STAT
- Jung DW, 2015, ANN PLAS SURG, V75, P463, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000580
- Kao HK, 2015, BRIT J SURG, V102, P998, DOI 10.1002/bjs.9826
- Karacaoglu E, 2005, ANN PLAS SURG, V55, P63, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000168246.75891.62
- Kato H, 2014, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V133, p303E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000066
- Kaufman MR, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V119, P2287, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000260712.44089.e7
- KERRIGAN CL, 1986, LAB ANIM SCI, V36, P408
- Khouri R, 2009, CLIN PLAST SURG, V36, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2008.11.009
- Khouri RK, 2013, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V132, P1280, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4c3a9
- Khouri RK, 2012, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V129, P1173, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2db6
- Khouri RK, 2014, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V2, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000183
- Kirkham JC, 2012, ANN PLAS SURG, V69, P479, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824a459f
- KONONAS TC, 1993, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V91, P763, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199304001-00001
- Lee JW, 2015, ARCH PLAST SURG-APS, V42, P150, DOI 10.5999/aps.2015.42.2.150
- Livaoglu Murat, 2009, J Cutan Aesthet Surg, V2, P21, DOI 10.4103/0974-2077.53095
- MARQUES A, 1994, SCAND J PLAST RECONS, V28, P241, DOI 10.3109/02844319409022006
- Munhoz AM, 2014, WORLD J CLIN ONCOL, V5, P478, DOI 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.478
- Nava MB, 2019, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V7, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002426
- Neuber F., 1893, ZBL CHIR, V22, P66
- NGUYEN A, 1990, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V85, P378, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199003000-00007
- NIECHAJEV I, 1994, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V94, P496, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199409000-00012
- Ozsoy Zafer, 2006, Aesthet Surg J, V26, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.asj.2006.04.003
- PARUMS DV, 1990, J CLIN PATHOL, V43, P752, DOI 10.1136/jcp.43.9.752
- de Arruda EGP, 2017, ACTA CIR BRAS, V32, P891, DOI 10.1590/s0102-865020170110000001
- Fraga MFP, 2008, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V61, P1044, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.06.034
- Pu LLQ, 2005, ANN PLAS SURG, V54, P288, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000153147.23088.cb
- Saint-Cyr M, 2012, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V28, P99, DOI 10.1055/s-0031-1287675
- Goes JCS, 2015, CLIN PLAST SURG, V42, P551, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.017
- Shiffman MA, 2001, DERMATOL SURG, V27, P819, DOI 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.01062.x
- Suh A, 2019, AGEING RES REV, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.arr.2019.100933
- Sunaga A, 2013, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V1, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0b013e3182a7e827
- Swindle M. M., 1994, ILAR News, V36, P1
- Tansey JT, 2004, IUBMB LIFE, V56, P379, DOI 10.1080/15216540400009968
- Tansey JT, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P6494, DOI 10.1073/pnas.101042998
- Zhu M, 2015, CELL TRANSPLANT, V24, P49, DOI 10.3727/096368913X675133
- Zocchi ML, 2008, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V32, P313, DOI 10.1007/s00266-007-9089-3
- Zografou A, 2013, ANN PLAS SURG, V71, P225, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826af01a