Safety and costs analysis of early hospital discharge after brain tumour surgery: a pilot study

dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorNEVILLE, Iuri Santana
dc.contributor.authorURENA, Francisco Matos
dc.contributor.authorQUADROS, Danilo Gomes
dc.contributor.authorSOLLA, Davi J. F.
dc.contributor.authorLIMA, Mariana Fontes
dc.contributor.authorSIMOES, Claudia Marquez
dc.contributor.authorVICENTIN, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorRIBEIRO JR., Ulysses
dc.contributor.authorAMORIM, Robson Luis Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorPAIVA, Wellingson Silva
dc.contributor.authorTEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T13:21:40Z
dc.date.available2020-08-20T13:21:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground A daily algorithm for hospital discharge (DAHD) is a key point in the concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. We aimed to evaluate the length of stay (LOS), rate of complications, and hospital costs variances after the introduction of the DAHD compared to the traditional postoperative management of brain tumour patients. Methods This is a cohort study with partial retrospective data collection. All consecutive patients who underwent brain tumour resection in 2017 were analysed. Demographics and procedure-related variables, as well as clinical outcomes, LOS and healthcare costs within 30 days after surgery were compared in patients before/pre-implementation and after/post-implementation the DAHD, which included: stable neurological examination; oral feeding without aspiration risk; pain control with oral medications; no intravenous medications. The algorithm was applied every morning and discharge was considered from day 1 after surgery if criteria was fulfilled. The primary outcome (LOS after surgery) analysis was adjusted for the preoperative performance status on a multivariable logistic regression model. Results A total of 61 patients were studied (pre-implementation 32, post-implementation 29). The baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. After the DAHD implementation, LOS decreased significantly (median 5 versus 3 days; p = 0.001) and the proportion of patients who were discharged on day 1 or 2 after surgery increased (44.8% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001). Major and minor complications rates, readmission rate, and unplanned return to hospital in 30-day follow-up were comparable between the groups. There was a significant reduction in the median costs of hospitalization in DAHD group (US$2135 vs US$2765, p = 0.043), mainly due to a reduction in median ward costs (US$922 vs US$1623, p = 0.009). Conclusions Early discharge after brain tumour surgery appears to be safe and inexpensive. The LOS and hospitalization costs were reduced without increasing readmission rate or postoperative complications.eng
dc.description.conferencedateOCT 19-23, 2019
dc.description.conferencelocalSan Francisco, CA
dc.description.conferencenameAnnual Meeting of the Congress-of-Neurological-Surgeons
dc.description.indexMEDLINEeng
dc.identifier.citationBMC SURGERY, v.20, n.1, article ID 105, 10p, 2020
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12893-020-00767-y
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2482
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36839
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMCeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Surgery
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.rights.holderCopyright BMCeng
dc.subjectBrain tumourseng
dc.subjectDischargeeng
dc.subjectERASeng
dc.subjectEnhanced recovery after surgeryeng
dc.subjectPostoperative length of stayeng
dc.subject.otherfast-track recoveryeng
dc.subject.other30-day readmissioneng
dc.subject.otherenhanced recoveryeng
dc.subject.othercraniotomyeng
dc.subject.othercareeng
dc.subject.otherrateseng
dc.subject.wosSurgeryeng
dc.titleSafety and costs analysis of early hospital discharge after brain tumour surgery: a pilot studyeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.categoryarticle; proceedings papereng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.author.externalLIMA, Mariana Fontes:Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Hosp Sao Paulo, Div Anaesthesiol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
hcfmusp.citation.scopus15
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcIURI SANTANA NEVILLE RIBEIRO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcFRANCISCO DEL ROSARIO MATOS URENA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcDANILO GOMES QUADROS
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcDAVI JORGE FONTOURA SOLLA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcCLAUDIA MARQUEZ SIMOES
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcEDUARDO APARECIDO VICENTIN
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcULYSSES RIBEIRO JUNIOR
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcROBSON LUIS OLIVEIRA DE AMORIM
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcWELLINGSON SILVA PAIVA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMANOEL JACOBSEN TEIXEIRA
hcfmusp.description.articlenumber105
hcfmusp.description.issue1
hcfmusp.description.volume20
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.pubmed32410602
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-85084855796
hcfmusp.origem.wosWOS:000536177100002
hcfmusp.publisher.cityLONDONeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryENGLANDeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAu K, 2016, J NEUROSURG, V125, P1130, DOI 10.3171/2015.11.JNS152151eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBoulton M, 2008, J NEUROSURG, V108, P649, DOI 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/4/0649eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDasenbrock HH, 2015, NEUROSURG FOCUS, V39, DOI 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15386eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDickinson H, 2015, J NEUROSURG, V122, P61, DOI 10.3171/2014.8.JNS1498eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceElsamadicy AA, 2018, J CLIN NEUROSCI, V47, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.021eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceENGELMAN RM, 1994, ANN THORAC SURG, V58, P1742, DOI 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91674-8eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFearon KCH, 2005, CLIN NUTR, V24, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGrundy PL, 2008, BRIT J NEUROSURG, V22, P360, DOI 10.1080/02688690801961858eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHanak BW, 2014, WORLD NEUROSURG, V81, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.11.068eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLjungqvist O, 2017, JAMA SURG, V152, P292, DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMa RC, 2016, WORLD NEUROSURG, V93, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.015eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMarcus LP, 2014, J NEUROSURG, V120, P1201, DOI 10.3171/2014.1.JNS131264eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNuno M, 2014, NEUROSURGERY, V74, P196, DOI 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000243eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePurzner T, 2011, NEUROSURGERY, V69, P119, DOI 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318215a270eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSawaya R, 1998, NEUROSURGERY, V42, P1044, DOI 10.1097/00006123-199805000-00054eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSughrue ME, 2015, WORLD NEUROSURG, V84, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.019eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTsai TC, 2013, NEW ENGL J MED, V369, P1134, DOI 10.1056/NEJMsa1303118eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVenkatraghavan L, 2016, CAN J ANESTH, V63, P1245, DOI 10.1007/s12630-016-0717-8eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWang Y, 2019, J NEUROSURG, V130, P1680, DOI 10.3171/2018.1.JNS171552eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWong JM, 2012, NEUROSURG FOCUS, V33, DOI 10.3171/2012.7.FOCUS12183eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZiai WC, 2003, CRIT CARE MED, V31, P2782, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098860.52812.24eng
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-10
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa5146e98-5c00-45e6-84c8-27a9269f3145
relation.isAuthorOfPublication91520629-c112-4bc0-a50f-53510553a920
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9100b5c9-873c-43b9-8300-d203537a2ca5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3abe2eb6-24de-4aac-8ebe-dfcc806ee8f1
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf0de2f21-778a-4cf2-860c-75dfc1f4a4fa
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd8d1703d-702a-4996-bbc2-fda96896cf90
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa4bfdcf9-89f7-472f-9936-aa817156faad
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb6424d5e-f461-42dc-a889-531d5fbb209c
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb0c9118e-a4e8-4a25-91f1-ed0445ced2bd
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb665cf91-624e-4b90-92bc-9df755eeeaaf
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya5146e98-5c00-45e6-84c8-27a9269f3145
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
art_NEVILLE_Safety_and_costs_analysis_of_early_hospital_discharge_2020.PDF
Tamanho:
957.44 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)