A comparison of three multimodality coronary 3D reconstruction methods

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
conferenceObject
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
IEEE
Autores
I, Panagiota Tsompou
SIOGKAS, Panagiotis K.
I, Antonis Sakellarios
ANDRIKOS, Ioannis O.
I, Vassiliki Kigka
MICHALIS, Lampros K.
I, Dimitrios Fotiadis
Citação
2019 41ST ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), p.5812-5815, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The assessment of the severity of arterial stenoses is of utmost importance in clinical practice. Several image modalities invasive and non-invasive are nowadays available and can be utilized for the 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the arterial geometry. Following our previous study, the present study was conducted to further strengthen the evaluation of three reconstruction methodologies, namely: (i) the Quantitative Coronary Analysis (QCA), (ii) the Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound VH-IVUS-Angiography hybrid method and (iii) the Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA). Data from 13 patients were employed to perform a quantitative analysis using specific metrics, such as, the Mean Wall Shear Stress (mWSS), the Minimum Lumen diameter (MLD), the Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD), the Degree of stenosis (DS%), and the Lesion length (LL). A high correlation was observed for the mWSS metric between the three reconstruction methods, especially between the QCA and CCTA (r=0.974, P<0.001).
Palavras-chave
Coronary atherosclerosis, 3D reconstruction, Mean Wall Shear Stress
Referências
  1. ASAKURA T, 1990, CIRC RES, V66, P1045, DOI 10.1161/01.RES.66.4.1045
  2. Bourantas CV, 2013, EUROINTERVENTION, V9, P582, DOI 10.4244/EIJV9I5A94
  3. CARO CG, 1969, NATURE, V223, P1159, DOI 10.1038/2231159a0
  4. FRY DL, 1969, CIRC RES, V24, P93, DOI 10.1161/01.RES.24.1.93
  5. Kigka VI, 2018, BIOMED SIGNAL PROCES, V40, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.bspc.2017.09.009
  6. Lee JB, 2012, INT J CARDIOVAS IMAG, V28, P1627, DOI 10.1007/s10554-011-9993-0
  7. Mackay J, 2004, ATLAS HEART DIS STRO
  8. Siogkas PK, 2015, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P973, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318526
  9. Tsompou Panagiota I, 2018, Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, V2018, P899, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512322
  10. Tsompou PI, 2017, COMP MED SY, P328, DOI 10.1109/CBMS.2017.131
  11. van der Giessen AG, 2010, INT J CARDIOVAS IMAG, V26, P781, DOI 10.1007/s10554-009-9546-y