Obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions correlate to specific gray matter volumes in treatment-naive patients

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
51
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
Editora
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, v.46, n.12, p.1635-1642, 2012
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Clinical and sociodemographic findings have supported that OCD is heterogeneous and composed of multiple potentially overlapping and stable symptom dimensions. Previous neuroimaging investigations have correlated different patterns of OCD dimension scores and gray matter (GM) volumes. Despite their relevant contribution, some methodological limitations, such as patient's previous medication intake, may have contributed to inconsistent findings. Method: Voxel-based morphometry was used to investigate correlations between regional GM volumes and symptom dimensions severity scores in a sample of 38 treatment-naive OCD patients. Several standardized instruments were applied, including an interview exclusively developed for assessing symptom dimensions severity (DY-BOCS). Results: Scores on the ""aggression"" dimension were positively correlated with GM volumes in lateral parietal cortex in both hemispheres and negatively correlated with bilateral insula, left putamen and left inferior OFC. Scores on the ""sexual/religious"" dimension were positively correlated with GM volumes within the right middle lateral OFC and right DLPFC and negatively correlated with bilateral ACC. Scores on the ""hoarding"" dimension were positively correlated with GM volumes in the left superior lateral OFC and negatively correlated in the right parahippocampal gyrus. No significant correlations between GM volumes and the ""contamination"" or ""symmetry"" dimensions were found. Conclusions: Building upon preexisting findings, our data with treatment-naive OCD patients have demonstrated distinct GM substrates implicated in both cognitive and emotion processing across different OCS dimensions.
Palavras-chave
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), Symptom dimensions, Neuroimaging, Voxel-based morphometry (VBM), Treatment-naive, Gray matter (GM)
Referências
  1. ALEXANDER GE, 1990, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V13, P266, DOI 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90107-L
  2. Anholt GE, 2009, J ANXIETY DISORD, V23, P830, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.04.004
  3. Ashburner J, 2005, NEUROIMAGE, V26, P839, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018
  4. BECK AT, 1961, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V4, P561
  5. Brett M, 2002, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V3, P243, DOI 10.1038/nrn756
  6. Cabeza R, 2000, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V12, P1, DOI 10.1162/08989290051137585
  7. Chamberlain SR, 2005, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V29, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.006
  8. Cuadra MB, 2005, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V24, P1548, DOI 10.1109/TMI.2005.857652
  9. Delucchi KL, 2004, AM J PSYCHIAT, V161, P1159, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1159
  10. First M.B., 1997, STRUCTURED CLIN INTE
  11. Friston K., 1995, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V2, P189
  12. Fullana MA, 2009, AM J PSYCHIAT, V166, P329, DOI [10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08071006, 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008/08071006]
  13. Gilbert AR, 2008, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V109, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2007.12.223
  14. Good CD, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P21, DOI 10.1006/nimg.2001.0786
  15. GOODMAN WK, 1989, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V46, P1006
  16. Greene JD, 2004, NEURON, V44, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
  17. Grisham JR, 2009, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V195, P138, DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.056812
  18. Hoexter MQ, 2012, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V37, P734, DOI 10.1038/npp.2011.250
  19. Hoexter Marcelo Queiroz, 2009, Rev Bras Psiquiatr, V31, P349
  20. Huyser C, 2009, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V33, P818, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.01.003
  21. Lawrence NS, 2007, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V61, P1072, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.033
  22. Leckman JF, 2007, CNS SPECTRUMS, V12, P376
  23. Mataix-Cols D, 2006, PSYCHIAT CLIN N AM, V29, P391, DOI 10.1016/j.psc.2006.02.006
  24. Mataix-Cols D, 2003, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V53, P482, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)01504-4
  25. Mataix-Cols D, 2011, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V67, P467, DOI 10.1002/jclp.20791
  26. Mataix-Cols D, 2005, AM J PSYCHIAT, V162, P228, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.228
  27. Mataix-Cols D, 2004, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V61, P564, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.61.6.564
  28. Menzies L, 2008, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V32, P525, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.09.005
  29. Moll J, 2009, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V33, P456, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.12.001
  30. Morein-Zamir S, 2010, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V212, P357, DOI 10.1007/s00213-010-1963-z
  31. Nagai M, 2007, EUR PSYCHIAT, V22, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.02.006
  32. Nishida S, 2011, PROG NEURO-PSYCHOPH, V35, P997, DOI 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.01.022
  33. Pujol J, 2004, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V61, P720, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.61.7.720
  34. Radua J, 2009, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V195, P393, DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.055046
  35. Rauch S. L., 1998, CNS SPECTRUMS, V3, P37
  36. Rosario-Campos MC, 2006, MOL PSYCHIATR, V11, P495, DOI 10.1038/sj.mp.4001798
  37. Rotge JY, 2009, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V65, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.06.019
  38. Song A, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6
  39. Szeszko PR, 2005, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V62, P782, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.782
  40. Talairach J, 1988, COPLANAR STEREOTAXIC
  41. Tolin DF, 2009, PSYCHOL MED, V39, P325, DOI 10.1017/S0033291708003371
  42. Valente AA, 2005, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V58, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.021
  43. van den Heuvel OA, 2009, BRAIN, V132, P853, DOI 10.1093/brain/awn267
  44. Yucel M, 2007, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V64, P946, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.946