Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
21
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2015
Editora
SPRINGER
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
SENCAN, Arzu
SENCAN, Aydin
PARDO, Rogerio Ruscitto do
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, v.47, n.7, p.1075-1084, 2015
Resumo
Robotic assistance may provide for distinct technical advantages over conventional laparoscopic technique. The goals of this study were (1) to objectively evaluate the difference in the learning curves by novice and expert surgeons in performing fundamental laparoscopic skills using conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) and (2) to evaluate the surgeons' frustration level in performing these tasks. Twelve experienced and 31 novices in laparoscopy were prospectively evaluated in performing three standardized laparoscopic tasks in five consecutive, weekly training sessions. Analysis of the learning curves was based on the magnitude, rate, and quickness in performance improvement. The participant's frustration and mood were also evaluated during and after every session. For the novice participants, RALS allowed for shorter time to task completion and greater accuracy. However, significant and rapid improvement in performance as measured by magnitude, rate, and quickness at each session was also seen with CLS. For the experienced surgeons, RALS only provided a slight improvement in performance. For all participants, the use of RALS was associated with less number of sessions in which they felt frustrated, less number of frustration episodes during a session, lower frustration score during and after the session, and higher good mood score. The advantages of RALS may be of most benefit when doing more complex tasks and by less experienced surgeons. RALS should not be used as a replacement for CLS but rather in specific situations in which it has the greatest advantages.
Palavras-chave
Robotics, Laparoscopy, Training, Frustration, Learning curves
Referências
- Arora S, 2010, WORLD J SURG, V34, P1756, DOI 10.1007/s00268-010-0559-4
- Ballantyne GH, 2002, SURG ENDOSC, V16, P1389, DOI 10.1007/s00464-001-8283-7
- Blavier A, 2007, AM J SURG, V194, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.014
- Chandra V, 2010, SURGERY, V147, P830, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.002
- Chowriappa AJ, 2013, J SURG RES, V185, P561, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.054
- Dulan G, 2012, SURGERY, V152, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.028
- Gallagher AG, 2001, WORLD J SURG, V25, P1478, DOI 10.1007/s00268-001-0133-1
- Gutt CN, 2004, BRIT J SURG, V91, P1390, DOI 10.1002/bjs.4700
- Hassan I, 2006, BRIT J SURG, V93, P1554, DOI 10.1002/bjs.5544
- Heemskerk J, 2007, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V17, P171, DOI 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346
- Herrell SD, 2005, UROLOGY, V66, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.084
- Judkins TN, 2009, SURG ENDOSC, V23, P590, DOI 10.1007/s00464-008-9933-9
- Kenngott HG, 2008, MINIM INVASIV THER, V17, P160, DOI 10.1080/13645700802103381
- Kim Hye Jin, 2014, Ann Coloproctol, V30, P71, DOI 10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.71
- McCullagh P, 1989, GEN LINEAR MODELS, V2nd
- Neter J., 1996, APPL LINEAR STAT MOD, V4th
- Orvieto MA, 2012, BJU INT, V110, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10877.x
- Ruurda JP, 2002, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V12, P41, DOI 10.1097/00019509-200202000-00007
- Scott DJ, 2001, AM J SURG, V182, P137, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00669-9
- Stefanidis D, 2010, SURG ENDOSC, V24, P377, DOI 10.1007/s00464-009-0578-0
- Vassiliou MC, 2005, AM J SURG, V190, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004
- Yohannes P, 2002, UROLOGY, V60, P39, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01717-X