Overtube-assisted enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of small-bowel polyps and tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_SULBARAN_Overtubeassisted_enteroscopy_and_capsule_endoscopy_for_the_diagnosis_2016.PDF (578.52 KB)
Citações na Scopus
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
DOI
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
Autores
MOENKEMUELLER, Klaus
Citação
ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, v.4, n.2, p.E151-E163, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background and study aims: Several studies have evaluated the utility of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and capsule endoscopy (CE) for patients with small-bowel disease showing inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of overtube-assisted enteroscopy (OAE) as well as the diagnostic concordance between OAE and CE for small-bowel polyps and tumors. Patients and methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in which the results of OAE were compared with the results of CE for the evaluation of small-bowel polyps and tumors. When data for surgically resected lesions were available, the histopathological results of OAE and surgical specimens were compared. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of small-bowel polyps and tumors were analyzed. Secondarily, the rates of diagnostic concordance and discordance between OAE and CE were calculated. Results: There were 15 full-length studies with a total of 821 patients that met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were as follows: 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.93), with heterogeneity chi(2)=41.23 (P = 0.0002) and inconsistency (I-2)=66.0 %; 0.97 (95 % CI 0.95-0.98), with heterogeneity chi(2)=45.27 (P=0.07) and inconsistency (I-2)=69.1 %; 16.61 (95 % CI 3.74-73.82), with heterogeneity Cochrane's Q=225.19 (P<0.01) and inconsistency (I-2)=93.8 %; and 0.14 (95 % CI 0.05-0.35), with heterogeneity Cochrane's Q=81.01 (P<.01) and inconsistency (I-2)=82.7 %, respectively. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) curve was constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.97. Conclusion: OAE is an accurate test for the detection of small-bowel polyps and tumors. OAE and CE have a high diagnostic concordance rate for small-bowel polyps and tumors. This study was registered in the PROSPERO international database (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/) with the study number CRD42015016000.
Palavras-chave
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/13928
Referências
  1. Akamatsu T, 2010, DIGEST ENDOSC, V22, P33, DOI 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00915.x
  2. Fujimori S, 2007, ENDOSCOPY, V39, P1053, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-967014
  3. MOSES LE, 1993, STAT MED, V12, P1293, DOI 10.1002/sim.4780121403
  4. Akerman PA, 2008, ENDOSCOPY, V40, P974, DOI 10.1055/s-0028-1103402
  5. Iddan G, 2000, NATURE, V405, P417, DOI 10.1038/35013140
  6. Higgins JPT, 2002, STAT MED, V21, P1539, DOI 10.1002/sim.1186
  7. Rondonotti E, 2008, ENDOSCOPY, V40, P488, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-995783
  8. Nakamura M, 2006, ENDOSCOPY, V38, P59, DOI 10.1055/s-2005-870446
  9. Whiting PF, 2011, ANN INTERN MED, V155, P529, DOI [10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009, 10.1059/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009]
  10. Kala Z, 2007, EUR J RADIOL, V62, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.01.023
  11. Gay G, 2008, ENDOSCOPY, V40, P140, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-995419
  12. Zagorowicz ES, 2013, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V19, P9043, DOI 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9043
  13. Yamamoto H, 2001, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V53, P216, DOI 10.1067/mge.2001.112181
  14. Ali R, 2015, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V82, P855, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.037
  15. Buscaglia JM, 2011, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V45, P342, DOI 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181eeb74b
  16. Chen WG, 2013, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V19, P3665, DOI 10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3665
  17. Moglia A, 2007, LANCET, V370, P114, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61066-6
  18. Choi H, 2007, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V66, pS22, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2007.06.048
  19. Tsujikawa T, 2008, ENDOSCOPY, V40, P11, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-966976
  20. Kamalaporn P, 2008, CAN J GASTROENTEROL, V22, P491
  21. Meron GD, 2000, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V52, P817, DOI 10.1067/mge.2000.110204
  22. Ross A, 2008, DIGEST DIS SCI, V53, P2140, DOI 10.1007/s10620-007-0110-0
  23. Albert JG, 2008, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, V20, P971, DOI 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282fb2a53
  24. Di Caro S, 2005, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V62, P545, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2005.04.029
  25. Fry LC, 2009, ALIMENT PHARM THER, V29, P135, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03864.x
  26. Matsumoto T, 2005, ENDOSCOPY, V37, P827, DOI 10.1055/s-870207
  27. Hartmann D, 2007, ENDOSCOPY, V39, pE276, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-966616
  28. Alexander JA, 2009, CURR OPIN GASTROEN, V25, P433, DOI 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32832d641e
  29. Postgate A, 2008, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V68, P1209, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.035
  30. Honda W, 2012, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V76, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.443
  31. Marmo R, 2009, ENDOSCOPY, V41, P587, DOI 10.1055/s-0029-1214896
  32. Perez-Cuadrado E, 2006, REV ESP ENFERM DIG, V98, P73, DOI 10.4321/s1130-01082006000200002
  33. Yamamoto H, 2004, CLIN GASTROENTEROL H, V2, P1010, DOI 10.1053/S1542-3565(04)00453-7
  34. Vere CC, 2009, ROM J MORPHOL EMBRYO, V50, P467
  35. Manno M, 2013, DIGEST LIVER DIS, V45, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.dld.2012.10.004
  36. Kameda N, 2008, J GASTROENTEROL, V43, P434, DOI 10.1007/s00535-008-2182-9
  37. Pasha SF, 2008, CLIN GASTROENTEROL H, V6, P671, DOI [10.1016/j.cgh.2008.01.005, 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.01-005]
  38. Partridge BJ, 2011, DIGEST DIS SCI, V56, P2701, DOI 10.1007/s10620-011-1640-z
  39. Li XB, 2007, CHINESE MED J-PEKING, V120, P30
  40. Riccioni ME, 2012, SURG ENDOSC, V26, P438, DOI 10.1007/s00464-011-1896-6
  41. Friedrich K, 2013, J GASTROEN HEPATOL, V28, P1496, DOI 10.1111/jgh.12280
  42. Chong AKH, 2006, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V64, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.007
  43. Almeida N, 2009, DIGEST DIS SCI, V54, P1520, DOI 10.1007/s10620-008-0512-7
  44. Frantz DJ, 2010, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V72, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.1117
  45. Cangemi DJ, 2013, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V47, P769, DOI 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318281a44e
  46. Arakawa D, 2009, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V69, P866, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.008
  47. Schafer C, 2007, Z GASTROENTEROL, V45, P237, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-962823
  48. Ginsberg GG, 2002, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V56, P621, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70106-5
  49. Kandulski Arne, 2008, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, V6, pA26, DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.042
  50. Lee BI, 2011, DIGEST DIS SCI, V56, P2920, DOI 10.1007/s10620-011-1839-z
  51. Liberati A, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  52. National Institute for Health Research, 2015, WELC PROSPERO INT PR
  53. Rustgi AK, 2006, SLEISENGER FORDTRANS, P2703
  54. Sethi S, 2014, DIGEST DIS SCI, V59, P2497, DOI 10.1007/s10620-014-3178-3

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MGT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/InCor
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/35