Transabdominal midline reconstruction by minimally invasive surgery: technique and results

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_COSTA_Transabdominal_midline_reconstruction_by_minimally_invasive_surgery_technique_2016.PDF (2.02 MB)
Citações na Scopus
33
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Editora
SPRINGER
DOI
Indexadores
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
ABDALLA, B. M. Z.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
HERNIA, v.20, n.2, p.257-265, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The introduction of the minimally invasive approach changed the way abdominal surgery was carried out. Open suture and mesh reinforcement in ventral hernia repair used to be the surgeon's choice of procedure. Although the laparoscopic approach, with defect bridging and mesh fixation, has been described since 1993, the procedure remains largely unchanged. Evidence shows that defect closure and retro-muscular mesh positioning have the best outcomes and are the best surgical practice. We therefore aimed to develop and demonstrate a procedure which combined the good results of open surgery using the Rives-Stoppa principles, particularly in terms of recurrence, with all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Between October 2012 and February 2014, 15 post-bariatric surgery patients underwent laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair. The peritoneal cavity was accessed through a 5-mm optical view cannula at the superior left quadrant. A suprapubic and two right and left lower quadrant cannulas were inserted for inferior access and dissection. The defect adhesions were released. The whole midline was closed with an endoscopic linear stapler, including the defect, from the lower abdomen, 4 cm below the umbilicus, until the epigastric region, including posterior sheath mechanical suturing and cutting in the same movement. A retrorectus space was created in which a retro-muscular mesh was deployed. Fixation was done using a hernia stapler against the posterior sheath from the peritoneal cavity to the abdominal wall muscles. Selection was based on xifo-umbilical incisional midline hernias post open bariatric surgery. Pregnant women, cancer patients, or patients with clinical contraindications were excluded. The patients mean age was 51.2 years (range 39-67). Four patients were men and eleven women. Two had well-compensated fibromyalgia, four had diabetes, and five had hypertension. The mean BMI was 29.5 kg/m(2) (range 23-31.6). Surgery was performed successfully in all cases through four ports; the number of incisional hernias was 3 +/- A 2, with a mean maximum width of 3.75 cm (range 2.1-9) and maximum length of 14 cm (7.5-20.5). The mean surgical time was 114.3 min (range 85-170), and the median hospital stay was 1.4 days. No intra-operative or immediate post-operative complication or death occurred. One patient had a seroma treated conservatively 1 week after surgery and another had a retro-muscular infection treated with percutaneous drainage. CT-Scans made before and after the procedure, showed total closure of the defect. QOL questionnaire showed satisfaction, acceptance, and no complaints. Although the study involved a small number of patients, it has proved the technique to be feasible, easy to perform, and have the combined benefits of laparoscopic and open surgery. The results, shown by CT-scan, peri-operative, and QOL findings, were good.
Palavras-chave
Ventral hernia, Midline, Incisional hernia, Minimally invasive surgery, Abdominal wall reconstruction, Obesity
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/14229
Referências
  1. Abdalla Ricardo Zugaib, 2013, Arq Bras Cir Dig, V26, P335, DOI 10.1590/S0102-67202013000400016
  2. Bittner R, 2014, SURG ENDOSC, V28, P2, DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6
  3. Colavita PD, 2012, ANN SURG, V256, P714, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182734130
  4. Stipa F, 2013, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V23, P419, DOI 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828e3c33
  5. van Ramshorst GH, 2012, AM J SURG, V204, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.01.012
  6. Heniford BT, 2000, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V190, P645, DOI 10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00280-5
  7. Muysoms FE, 2009, HERNIA, V13, P407, DOI 10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x
  8. Forte A, 2011, ANN ITAL CHIR, V82, P313
  9. Sasse KC, 2012, JSLS-J SOC LAPAROEND, V16, P380, DOI 10.4293/108680812X13462882736097
  10. Cuccurullo D, 2013, HERNIA, V17, P557, DOI 10.1007/s10029-013-1055-1
  11. Ji Y, 2013, SURG ENDOSC, V27, P1778, DOI 10.1007/s00464-012-2680-y
  12. Williams RF, 2008, HERNIA, V12, P141, DOI 10.1007/s10029-007-0300-x
  13. Hussain D, 2012, JCPSP-J COLL PHYSICI, V22, P683, DOI 11.2012/JCPSP.683685
  14. Wormer BA, 2013, J SURG RES, V184, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.034
  15. MUDGE M, 1985, BRIT J SURG, V72, P70, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800720127
  16. Burger JWA, 2005, WORLD J SURG, V29, P1608, DOI 10.1007/s00268-005-7929-3
  17. Salvilla SA, 2012, J MINIM ACCESS SURG, V8, P111, DOI 10.4103/0972-9941.103107
  18. LEBLANC KA, 1993, SURG LAPAROSC ENDOSC, V3, P39
  19. Prasad P, 2011, INDIAN J SURG, V73, P403, DOI 10.1007/s12262-011-0366-7
  20. Perrone JM, 2005, SURGERY, V138, P708, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.054
  21. Tse GH, 2010, HERNIA, V14, P583, DOI 10.1007/s10029-010-0709-5
  22. Bauer J J, 2002, Hernia, V6, P120
  23. Colavita PD, 2012, ANN SURG, V256, DOI [10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182734130722-3, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0B013E3182734130]
  24. Hasbahcec M, 2013, SURG TODAY, V44, P227
  25. Iqbal W, 2007, WORLD J SURG, V31, P2398
  26. Moreau PE, 2012, J VISC SURG, V149, pE40, DOI 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.09.001
  27. Nhoa RLH, 2012, J VISC SURG, V149, pe3
  28. Notash AY, 2007, HERNIA, V11, P25
  29. Schroeder AD, 2012, SURG ENDOSC, V27, P648

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MGT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/InRad
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/35
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03