Factors associated with complications or failure of endoscopic balloon dilation of anastomotic stricture secondary to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
22
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, v.12, n.3, p.582-586, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a commonly used technique of bariatric surgery. One of the most important complications is gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture. Endoscopic balloon dilation appears to be well tolerated and effective, but well-designed randomized, controlled trials have not yet been conducted. Objective: Identify factors associated with complications or failure of endoscopic balloon dilation of anastomotic stricture secondary to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Setting: Gastrointestinal endoscopy service, university hospital, Brazil. Methods: The records of 64 patients with anastomotic stricture submitted to endoscopic dilation with hydrostatic balloon dilation were reviewed. Information was collected on gastric pouch length, anastomosis diameter before dilation, number of dilation sessions, balloon diameter at each session, anastomosis diameter after the last dilation session, presence of postsurgical complications, endoscopic complications, and outcome of dilation. Comparisons were made among postsurgical and endoscopic complications; number of dilations, balloon diameter; anastomosis diameter before dilation; and dilation outcome. Results: Success of dilation treatment was 95%. Perforation was positively and significantly associated with the number of dilation sessions (P =.03). Highly significant associations were found between ischemic segment and perforation (P <.001) and between ischemic segment and bleeding (P =.047). Ischemic segment (P =.02) and fistula (P =.032) were also associated with dilation failure. Conclusion: Ischemic segment and fistula were found to be important risk factors for balloon dilation failure. The greater the number of dilation sessions, the greater the number of endoscopic complications.
Palavras-chave
Morbid obesity, Bariatric surgery, Endoscopy, Stenosis, Endoscopic dilation
Referências
  1. Goitein D, 2005, SURG ENDOSC, V19, P628, DOI 10.1007/s00464-004-9135-z
  2. Catalano MF, 2007, OBES SURG, V17, P298, DOI 10.1007/s11695-007-9055-9
  3. Sczepaniak JP, 2009, SURG OBES RELAT DIS, V5, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2008.10.005
  4. Csendes A, 2009, OBES SURG, V19, P269, DOI 10.1007/s11695-008-9625-5
  5. Bell RL, 2003, OBES SURG, V13, P728, DOI 10.1381/096089203322509291
  6. Ryskina KL, 2010, SURG ENDOSC, V24, P554, DOI 10.1007/s00464-009-0605-1
  7. Ikeoka D, 2010, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V56, P116, DOI 10.1590/S0104-42302010000100026
  8. Ahmad J, 2003, ENDOSCOPY, V35, P725
  9. Alasfar F, 2009, MED PRIN PRACT, V18, P364, DOI 10.1159/000226289
  10. Escalona A, 2007, SURG ENDOSC, V21, P765, DOI 10.1007/s00464-006-9134-3
  11. Higa KD, 2000, OBES SURG, V10, P509, DOI 10.1381/096089200321593706
  12. Peifer KJ, 2007, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V66, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2006.10.012
  13. Dolce CJ, 2009, JSLS-J SOC LAPAROEND, V13, P306
  14. Espinel J, 2011, REV ESP ENFERM DIG, V103, P508, DOI 10.4321/s1130-01082011001000002
  15. Caro L, 2008, DIGEST DIS, V26, P314, DOI 10.1159/000177015
  16. Cusati D, 2011, SURG OBES RELAT DIS, V7, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2010.11.003
  17. Walsh C, 2015, WORLD J GASTROINTEST, V7, P518, DOI 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.518
  18. Frutos MD, 2009, OBES SURG, V19, P1631, DOI 10.1007/s11695-009-9962-z
  19. Yimcharoen P, 2012, SURG OBES RELAT DIS, V8, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2011.01.043
  20. Rondan A, 2012, OBES SURG, V22, P1491, DOI 10.1007/s11695-012-0671-7
  21. Matthews BD, 2000, AM J SURG, V179, P476, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00393-7
  22. Kassir R, 2014, SURG OBES RELAT DIS, V10, P560, DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2014.01.029
  23. Mathew A, 2009, DIGEST DIS SCI, V54, P1971, DOI 10.1007/s10620-008-0581-7
  24. Barba CA, 2003, SURG ENDOSC, V17, P416, DOI 10.1007/s00464-002-8908-5
  25. Sarkhosh K, 2013, CAN J SURG, V56, P347, DOI 10.1503/cjs.033511
  26. Da Costa M, 2011, OBES SURG, V21, P36, DOI 10.1007/s11695-010-0154-7
  27. Rossi TR, 2005, AM J SURG, V189, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.11.026
  28. Hanna K, 2012, SURG OBES RELAT DIS, V8, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2011.01.046
  29. Campillo-Sato A, 2010, REV ESP ENFERM DIG, V102, P187, DOI 10.4321/s1130-01082010000300005
  30. Campos Josemberg Marins, 2012, Arq Bras Cir Dig, V25, P283, DOI 10.1590/S0102-67202012000400014
  31. Carrodeguas Lester, 2006, Surg Obes Relat Dis, V2, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2005.10.014
  32. Espinel J, 2012, WORLD J GASTROINTEST, V16, P290
  33. Fernandez-Esparrach G, 2008, OBES SURG, V18, P155, DOI 10.1007/s11695-007-9372-z
  34. Fernandez-Esparrach G, 2011, GASTROENT HEPAT-BARC, V34, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2010.12.003
  35. Ferraz Edmundo Machado, 2003, Rev. Col. Bras. Cir., V30, P98, DOI 10.1590/S0100-69912003000200004
  36. Puig CA, 2014, SURG OBES RELAT DIS, V10, P613, DOI 10.1016/j.soard.2013.12.018
  37. Ukieja A, 2008, SURG ENDOSC, V22, P1746