Grooved and nongrooved clear corneal incisions in phacoemulsification: permeability study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WICHTIG PUBLISHING
Autores
BERGAMASCO, Victor D.
ANTUNES, Victor A. C.
MALAVAZZI, Gustavo R.
Citação
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, v.26, n.3, p.248-251, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: To detect the inflow of trypan blue through grooved and nongrooved sutureless self-sealing clear corneal incisions at the end of phacoemulsification as compared to a control group. Methods: A prospective randomized masked trial considered 52 eyes randomized into 3 groups in which phacoemulsification was performed: group A, nongrooved incisions; group B, grooved incisions; and group C, controls. By the end of each surgery, trypan blue was instilled on the ocular surface in groups A and B and rinsed out after 2 minutes. A sample of the anterior chamber content was collected and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography to identify and quantify the trypan blue concentration. The presence of trypan blue was expressed as a specific single peak graphic image. The mean areas of these peaks were used to assess the groups using a nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the nongrooved incisions group and the control group (p = 0.0448). No significant difference was observed between group B (grooved incision) and controls (p = 0.1800). Conclusions: Trypan blue was detected in the anterior chamber when nongrooved clear corneal incision was used. There was no trypan blue detection in the group with grooved clear corneal main incisions.
Palavras-chave
Cornea, Phacoemulsification, Trypan blue
Referências
  1. AGAPITOS PJ, 1993, CURR OPIN OPHTHALMOL, V4, P39, DOI 10.1097/00055735-199302000-00008
  2. Chawdhary S, 2006, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V32, P609, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.020
  3. Cooper BA, 2003, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V136, P300, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00202-2
  4. Dupont-Monod S, 2005, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V35, P444
  5. Etter J, 2008, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V34, P1417, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.030
  6. Fine IH, 2007, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V33, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.icrs.2006.09.016
  7. Fukuda S, 2011, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V151, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.09.010
  8. Herretes S, 2005, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V140, P737, DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.069
  9. LANGERMAN DW, 1994, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V20, P84
  10. Leaming DV, 2001, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V27, P948, DOI 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00905-1
  11. Lundstom M, 2007, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V114, P866, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.11.025
  12. Lyle WA, 1996, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V22, P1456
  13. Masket S, 2007, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V33, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.11.006
  14. McDonnell PJ, 2003, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V110, P2342, DOI 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00733-4
  15. Mifflin MD, 2012, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V38, P933, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.019
  16. Nichamin LD, 2006, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V32, P1556, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.07.009
  17. Praveen MR, 2008, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V34, P1007, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.03.015
  18. Sarayba MA, 2004, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V138, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.03.012
  19. Taban M, 2005, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V123, P613, DOI 10.1001/archopht.123.5.613
  20. Taban M, 2004, SURV OPHTHALMOL, V49, pS62, DOI 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.01.003
  21. Taban M, 2005, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V123, P643, DOI 10.1001/archopht.123.5.643
  22. Vasavada AR, 2007, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V33, P623, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.010
  23. Yetik H, 2002, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V28, P988, DOI 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01217-8