Effects of caffeine supplementation in post-thaw human semen over different incubation periods

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
17
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Editora
WILEY-BLACKWELL
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
ANDROLOGIA, v.48, n.9, p.961-966, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of caffeine supplementation in post-cryopreservation human semen over different incubation periods. After collection by masturbation, 17 semen samples were analysed according to World Health Organization criteria, processed and cryopreserved with TEST-yolk buffer (1:1) in liquid nitrogen. After a thawing protocol, samples were incubated with 2mm of caffeine for 0, 5, 15, 30 or 60min, followed by analysis of motility and mitochondrial activity using 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Mean variance analysis was performed, and P<0.05 was the adopted significance threshold. Samples incubated for 15min showed increased progressive motility compared to other periods of incubation, as well as a reduced percentage of immotile spermatozoa (P<0.05). In samples incubated for 5min, increased mitochondrial activity above 50% was observed (DABI and DABII). Although cryosurvival rates were low after the cryopreservation process, incubation with caffeine was associated with an increase in sperm motility, particularly 15-min incubation, suggesting that incubation with caffeine can be an important tool in patients with worsening seminal quality undergoing infertility treatment.
Palavras-chave
Caffeine, cryopreservation, mitochondria, sperm motility, spermatozoa
Referências
  1. Alminana C, 2005, THERIOGENOLOGY, V64, P1783, DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.04.008
  2. ALVAREZ JG, 1992, J ANDROL, V13, P232
  3. Awad H, 2006, INT J ANDROL, V29, P409, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00624.x
  4. Bamman MM, 2014, MAYO CLIN PROC, V89, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.013
  5. da Silva BF, 2010, FERTIL STERIL, V94, P564, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.022
  6. Esteves Sandro C., 2003, Int. braz j urol., V29, P133, DOI 10.1590/S1677-55382003000200007
  7. Esteves SC, 2003, INT BRAZ J UROL, V29
  8. Fariello RM, 2012, BJU INT, V110, P863, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10813.x
  9. FATTOUH ESM, 1991, THERIOGENOLOGY, V36, P149, DOI 10.1016/0093-691X(91)90444-I
  10. Hallak J, 2000, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V17, P591, DOI 10.1023/A:1026443510493
  11. Hallak J, 1999, UROLOGY, V54, P894, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00267-8
  12. Hallak J, 2000, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V17, P218, DOI 10.1023/A:1009443901307
  13. HRUDKA F, 1988, INT J ANDROL, V11, P457
  14. Jensen TK, 2010, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V171, P883, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwq007
  15. Klonoff-Cohen H, 2002, HUM REPROD, V17, P1746, DOI 10.1093/humrep/17.7.1746
  16. Li ZL, 2010, J ANDROL, V31, P437, DOI 10.2164/jandrol.109.007849
  17. Luboshitzky R, 2002, J ANDROL, V23, P572
  18. Paasch U, 2004, BIOL REPROD, V71, P1828, DOI 10.1095/biolreprod.103.025627
  19. Pena FJ, 2003, ANIM REPROD SCI, V78, P85, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00049-6
  20. Ramlau-Hansen CH, 2008, HUM REPROD, V23, P2799, DOI 10.1093/humrep/den331
  21. Ruiz-Pesini E, 1998, CLIN CHEM, V44, P1616
  22. Sharma RK, 1996, UROLOGY, V48, P835, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00313-5
  23. Sobreiro Bernardo Passos, 2005, Sao Paulo Med. J., V123, P161, DOI 10.1590/S1516-31802005000400002
  24. Stanic P, 2000, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V91, P65, DOI 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00255-9
  25. Succu S, 2011, J PINEAL RES, V50, P310, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2010.00843.x
  26. Wang AW, 1997, UROLOGY, V49, P921, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00070-8
  27. World Health Organization, 2010, WHO LAB MAN EX PROC
  28. Yamaguchi S, 2012, THERIOGENOLOGY, V77, P926, DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.09.023
  29. Yamaguchi S, 2009, J REPROD DEVELOP, V55, P645
  30. Zribi N, 2010, FERTIL STERIL, V93, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.038