Effect of Prenatal Counseling on Breastfeeding Rates in Mothers of Twins
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
8
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, v.46, n.2, p.229-237, 2017
Resumo
Objective: To investigate the effect of antenatal breastfeeding counseling on the breastfeeding rates for women who give birth to twins. Design: Prospective randomized trial. Setting: Multiple Pregnancy Unit, Obstetrics Department, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Participants: A total of 171 mothers of twins and their 342 infants. Methods: The participants were randomized into the prenatal counseling group (PCG) or control group (CG). Breastfeeding data were collected through personal interviews at three times after birth: 30 to 40 days (Time 1), 90 days (Time 2), and 180 days (Time 3). The primary endpoint was a comparison of the mothers' breastfeeding rates between PCG and CG in each analyzed period. The secondary endpoint was the comparison of the overall rates of twin infant breastfeeding between PCG and CG until 180 days after birth. Results: The final analysis included 68 women pregnant with twins in the PCG and 60 in the CG. There was no significant difference in the breastfeeding rates between PCG and CG in the analyzed periods: Time 1 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.71, 4.95]), Time 2 (OR = 1.50, 95% CI [0.72, 3.10]), and Time 3 (OR = 1.06, 95% CI [0.51, 2.19]). Also, no difference existed in the overall rates of breastfeeding between PCG and CG at 180 days. Conclusion: In women pregnant with twins, antenatal breastfeeding counseling did not significantly affect the breastfeeding rates. Further research about the best moment to counsel mothers of twins is needed to improve breastfeeding rates.
Palavras-chave
breastfeeding, breastfeeding counseling, breastfeeding rates, twin pregnancies, twins
Referências
- Babakazo P, 2015, INT BREASTFEED J, V10, DOI 10.1186/s13006-015-0044-7
- Cai Xiaodong, 2012, Int Breastfeed J, V7, P12, DOI 10.1186/1746-4358-7-12
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014, BREASTL REP CARD US
- R Core Team, 2016, R VERS 3 2 5
- Coutinho SB, 2005, LANCET, V366, P1094, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67421-1
- Damato EG, 2005, JOGNN-J OBST GYN NEO, V34, P201, DOI 10.1177/0884217504273671
- DATASUS, 2012, IND RISK FACT PROT
- Eidelman AI, 2012, PEDIATRICS, V129, pE827, DOI 10.1542/peds.2011-3552
- Fell DB, 2012, BMC PREGNANCY CHILDB, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-12-103
- Geraghty SR, 2004, AMBUL PEDIATR, V4, P226, DOI 10.1367/A03-165R1.1
- Hauck FR, 2011, PEDIATRICS, V128, P103, DOI 10.1542/peds.2010-3000
- Horta B., 2013, LONG TERM EFFECTS BR
- Klein J. P., 2010, STAT BIOL HLTH
- Ladores S, 2015, J HUM LACT, V31, P504, DOI 10.1177/0890334415585511
- Mattar CN, 2007, OBSTET GYNECOL, V109, P73, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249613.15466.26
- Ministry of Health, 2015, INF HLTH BREASTF COM
- Ooki Syuichi, 2008, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, V13, P187, DOI 10.1007/s12199-008-0028-y
- Rozas M R, 2000, Aten Primaria, V26, P224
- Su LL, 2007, BRIT MED J, V335, P596, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39279.656343.55
- World Health Organization, 2001, OPT DUR EXCL BREASTF
- World Health Organization, 1998, EV 10 STEPS SUCC BRE
- Wong KL, 2014, OBSTET GYNECOL, V124, P961, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000481
- Yokoyama Y, 2006, TWIN RES HUM GENET, V9, P298