The influence of population stratification on genetic markers associated with type 1 diabetes

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
23
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
Citação
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, v.7, article ID 43513, 10p, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Ethnic admixtures may interfere with the definition of type 1 diabetes (T1D) risk determinants. The role of HLA, PTPN22, INS-VNTR, and CTLA4 in T1D predisposition was analyzed in Brazilian T1D patients (n = 915), with 81.7% self-reporting as white and 789 controls (65.6% white). The results were corrected for population stratification by genotyping 93 ancestry informative markers (AIMs) (BeadXpress platform). Ancestry composition and structural association were characterized using Structure 2.3 and STRAT. Ethnic diversity resulted in T1D determinants that were partially discordant from those reported in Caucasians and Africans. The greatest contributor to T1D was the HLA-DR3/DR4 genotype (OR = 16.5) in 23.9% of the patients, followed by -DR3/DR3 (OR = 8.9) in 8.7%, -DR4/DR4 (OR = 4.7) in 6.0% and -DR3/DR9 (OR = 4.9) in 2.6%. Correction by ancestry also confirmed that the DRB1*09DQB1*0202 haplotype conferred susceptibility, whereas the DRB1*07-DQB1*0202 and DRB1*11DQB1*0602 haplotypes were protective, which is similar to reports in African-American patients. By contrast, the DRB1*07-DQB1*0201 haplotype was protective in our population and in Europeans, despite conferring susceptibility to Africans. The DRB1*10-DQB1*0501 haplotype was only protective in the Brazilian population. Predisposition to T1D conferred by PTPN22 and INS-VNTR and protection against T1D conferred by the DRB1*16 allele were confirmed. Correcting for population structure is important to clarify the particular genetic variants that confer susceptibility/protection for T1D in populations with ethnic admixtures.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. American Diabetes Association, 2015, DIABETES CARE S1, V38
  2. Bennett ST, 1997, NAT GENET, V17, P350, DOI 10.1038/ng1197-350
  3. Bottini N, 2004, NAT GENET, V36, P337, DOI 10.1038/ng1323
  4. Bussab W. O., 1987, ESTATISTICA BASICA
  5. Mattana TCC, 2014, MEDIAT INFLAMM, DOI 10.1155/2014/694948
  6. Conover WJ, 1980, PRACTICAL NONPARAMET
  7. Donner H, 1997, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V82, P143, DOI 10.1210/jc.82.1.143
  8. Eisenbarth G. S., TYPE 1 DIABETES CELL
  9. Erlich H, 2008, DIABETES, V57, P1084, DOI 10.2337/db07-1331
  10. Falush D, 2003, GENETICS, V164, P1567
  11. Gomes MB, 2014, DIABETOL METAB SYNDR, V6, DOI 10.1186/1758-5996-6-67
  12. Hauache OM, 2005, DIS MARKERS, V21, P139
  13. Karvonen M, 2000, DIABETES CARE, V23, P1516, DOI 10.2337/diacare.23.10.1516
  14. Mainardi-Novo DTO, 2013, CLIN EXP IMMUNOL, V172, P16, DOI 10.1111/cei.12030
  15. Miller SA, 1998, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V16, P1215
  16. Nassir R, 2009, BMC GENET, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-10-39
  17. Neter J., 1990, APPL LINEAR STAT MOD
  18. Noble JA, 2013, DIABETES, V62, P3292, DOI 10.2337/db13-0094
  19. Pena SDJ, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017063
  20. Pritchard JK, 2000, AM J HUM GENET, V67, P170, DOI 10.1086/302959
  21. Silva Maria Elizabeth Rossi da, 2008, Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol, V52, P166
  22. Steck A. K., 2004, ADV EXP MED BIOL, V552, P170
  23. Thomson G, 2007, TISSUE ANTIGENS, V70, P110, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2007.00867.x
  24. Undlien D. E., 1999, DIABETOLOGIA
  25. Winer BJ., 1971, STAT PRINCIPLES EXPT
  26. Zhang Q., 2012, DIABETES RES CLIN PR, V97, P446