EUS-guided pancreatic drainage for pancreatic strictures after failed ERCP: a multicenter international collaborative study

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_TYBERG_EUSguided_pancreatic_drainage_for_pancreatic_strictures_after_failed_2017.PDF (962.19 KB)
Citações na Scopus
99
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Editora
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI
Indexadores
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
TYBERG, Amy
SHARAIHA, Reem Z.
KEDIA, Prashant
KUMTA, Nikhil
GAIDHANE, Monica
GIOVANNINI, Marc
KAHALEH, Michel
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, v.85, n.1, p.164-169, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background and Aims: Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is considered first-line therapy for management of symptomatic pancreatic duct obstruction. Technical failure with ERP occurs when the main pancreatic duct cannot be cannulated. EUS-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct is a minimally invasive alternative to surgery for failed conventional ERP. We present an international, multicenter study on the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD) for patients who fail conventional endoscopic therapy. Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2015, 80 patients underwent EUS-PD at 4 academic centers in 3 countries. Patient demographics, medical history, procedure data, and follow-up clinical data were collected. Technical success was defined as successful pancreatic duct drainage with stent placement. Clinical success was defined as resolution or improvement of symptoms or improvement on postprocedure imaging. Results: Eighty patients (62.5% men; mean age, 58.2 +/- 15.5 years) were included. All patients had attempted ERP and/or extracorporeal lithotripsy if needed before EUS-PD. Technical success was achieved in 89% of patients (n = 71). Clinical success was achieved in 81% of patients overall (65/80) and in 92% of patients who achieved technical success (65/71). Immediate adverse events occurred in 20% of patients (n = 16) and delayed adverse events occurred in 11% of patients (n = 9). Conclusions: With appropriate endoscopic expertise, EUS-PD offers a minimally invasive, more effective, and safer alternative to some surgical PD procedures. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01522573.)
Palavras-chave
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/18999
Referências
  1. ADAMS DB, 1994, ANN SURG, V219, P481, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199405000-00006
  2. Amano H, 1998, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V45, P2382
  3. Barkay O, 2010, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V71, P1166, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.048
  4. Brauer BC, 2009, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V70, P471, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.233
  5. Costamagna G, 2006, ENDOSCOPY, V38, P254, DOI 10.1055/s-2005-921069
  6. CREMER M, 1990, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V25, P77, DOI 10.3109/00365529009093130
  7. CREMER M, 1991, ENDOSCOPY, V23, P171, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-1010649
  8. Dumonceau JM, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, P547, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)81583-5
  9. Ergun M, 2011, ENDOSCOPY, V43, P518, DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1256333
  10. Fink A S, 1986, Pancreas, V1, P180, DOI 10.1097/00006676-198603000-00013
  11. Francois E, 2002, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V56, P128, DOI 10.1067/mge.2002.125547
  12. Fujii LL, 2013, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V78, P854, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.016
  13. Gines A, 2009, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V69, pS43, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.012
  14. Kahaleh M, 2003, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V58, P919, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02297-1
  15. Kahaleh M, 2007, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V65, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2006.05.008
  16. Kinney TP, 2009, ENDOSCOPY, V41, P898, DOI 10.1055/s-0029-1215081
  17. Kurihara T, 2013, DIGEST ENDOSC, V25, P109, DOI 10.1111/den.12100
  18. Makola D, 2006, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V101, P2347, DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00779.x
  19. Mallery S, 2004, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V59, P100, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02300-9
  20. MARKOWITZ JS, 1994, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V129, P374
  21. NEALON WH, 1993, ANN SURG, V217, P458, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199305010-00005
  22. Reid-Lombardo KM, 2007, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V11, P1704, DOI 10.1007/s11605-007-0369-7
  23. Shah JN, 2012, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V75, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.032
  24. Simmons DT, 2008, PANCREATOLOGY, V8, P194, DOI 10.1159/000123608
  25. Sotoudehmanesh R, 2007, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V102, P978, DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01165.x
  26. Tessier G, 2007, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V65, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.029
  27. Varadarajulu S, 2009, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V69, pS200, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.032
  28. Vila JJ, 2012, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V76, P1133, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.001
  29. Will U, 2007, J HEPATO-BILIARY-PAN, V14, P377, DOI 10.1007/s00534-006-1139-8

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/26