Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/2036
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorHATANAKA, Marcelo-
dc.contributor.authorALENCAR, Luciana M.-
dc.contributor.authorMORAES, Carlos G. De-
dc.contributor.authorSUSANNA JR., Remo-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-23T16:41:41Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-23T16:41:41Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, v.41, n.4, p.355-359, 2013-
dc.identifier.issn1442-6404-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/2036-
dc.description.abstractBackground The water-drinking test has been used as a stress test to evaluate the drainage system of the eye. However, in order to be clinically applicable,a test must provide reproducible results with consistent measurements. This study was performed to verify the reproducibility of intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water-drinking test in patients with ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. Design A prospective analysis of patients in a tertiary care unit for glaucoma treatment. Participants Twenty-four ocular hypertension and 64 open-angle glaucoma patients not under treatment. Methods The water-drinking test was performed in 2 consecutive days by the same examiners in patients not under treatment. Reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Main Outcome Measures Peak and fluctuation of intraocular pressure obtained with the water-drinking test were analysed for reproducibility. Results Eighty-eight eyes from 24 ocular hypertension and 64 open-angle glaucoma patients not under treatment were evaluated. Test and retest intraocular pressure peak values were 28.38 +/- 4.64 and 28.38 +/- 4.56mmHg, respectively (P=1.00). Test and retest intraocular pressure fluctuation values were 5.75 +/- 3.9 and 4.99 +/- 2.7mmHg, respectively (P=0.06). Based on intraclass coefficient, reproducibility was excellent for peak intraocular pressure (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.79) and fair for intraocular pressure fluctuation (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.37). Conclusion Intraocular pressure peaks detected during the water-drinking test presented excellent reproducibility, whereas the reproducibility of fluctuation was considered fair.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELL-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Experimental Ophthalmology-
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess-
dc.subjectintraocular pressure-
dc.subjectocular hypertension-
dc.subjectreproducibility-
dc.subjectstress test-
dc.subject.otherfixed-combination-
dc.subject.otherdiagnostic value-
dc.subject.otheropen-label-
dc.subject.otherglaucoma-
dc.subject.otherlatanoprost-
dc.subject.othertimolol-
dc.subject.other8-week-
dc.titleReproducibility of intraocular pressure peak and fluctuation of the water-drinking test-
dc.typearticle-
dc.rights.holderCopyright WILEY-BLACKWELL-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02882.x-
dc.identifier.pmid23009734-
dc.subject.wosOphthalmology-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-
hcfmusp.author.externalMORAES, Carlos G. De:NYU, Sch Med, New York Eye & Ear Infirm, Einhorn Clin Res Ctr, New York, NY USA-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage355-
hcfmusp.description.endpage359-
hcfmusp.description.issue4-
hcfmusp.description.volume41-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-84878944501-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000320032700007-
hcfmusp.publisher.cityHOBOKEN-
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSA-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAlencar MA, 2012, ARVO 2012 FORT LAUD-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceARMALY MF, 1980, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V98, P2163-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBrubaker RF, 2001, IGR, V3, P1-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChen CH, 2000, J OCUL PHARMACOL TH, V16, P37, DOI 10.1089/jop.2000.16.37-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChristiansen GA, 2004, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V111, P1658, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.006-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDanesh-Meyer HV, 2008, CLIN EXP OPHTHALMOL, V36, P301, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01782.x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDe Moraes Carlos Gustavo Vasconcelos, 2009, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, V247, P385, DOI 10.1007/s00417-008-0969-2-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDe Moraes CGV, 2009, CLIN EXP OPHTHALMOL, V37, P270, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02003.x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFacio AC, 2009, J OCUL PHARMACOL TH, V25, P447, DOI 10.1089/jop.2009.0018-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFan JC, 2008, CLIN EXP OPHTHALMOL, V36, P304, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01787.x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFleiss J, 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, P218-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFurlanetto RL, 2010, CLINICS, V65, P967, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322010001000007-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGoldberg I, 2010, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V150, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.035-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHatanaka M, 2008, J GLAUCOMA, V17, P674, DOI 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318168f008-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHatanaka M, 2010, J GLAUCOMA, V19, P331, DOI 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181b4cab4-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKumar RS, 2008, CLIN EXP OPHTHALMOL, V36, P312, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01765.x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMalerbi FK, 2005, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V89, P540, DOI 10.1136/bjo.2004.058230-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMedeiros FA, 2002, J OCUL PHARMACOL TH, V18, P489, DOI 10.1089/108076802321021036-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMedina FM, 2009, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V72, P283, DOI 10.1590/S0004-27492009000300002-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMILLER D, 1964, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V58, P243-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRASMUSSEN KE, 1976, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V54, P160-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceROTH JA, 1974, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V58, P55, DOI 10.1136/bjo.58.1.55-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSchmidt K., 1928, ARCH AUGENHEILKD, V98, P569-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSusanna R, 1979, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V42, P275-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSusanna R, 2006, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V47, P641, DOI 10.1167/iovs.04-0268-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSusanna R, 2004, J OCUL PHARMACOL TH, V20, P401, DOI 10.1089/1080768042360834-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSusanna R, 2004, CLIN THER, V26, P755-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSusanna R, 2005, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V89, P1298, DOI 10.1136/bjo.2005.070649-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTakahashi W, 1979, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V42, P277-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVasconcelos-Moraes CG, 2008, CLINICS, V63, P433, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322008000400004-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYOSHIKAWA K, 1993, ACTA OPHTHALMOL, V71, P463-
dc.description.indexMEDLINE-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus25-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-04-12-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOF
Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Oftalmologia - FM/MOF

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/33
LIM/33 - Laboratório de Oftalmologia


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_HATANAKA_Reproducibility_of_intraocular_pressure_peak_and_fluctuation_of_2013.PDF
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)289.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.