Renal Volumes Measured by 3-Dimensional Sonography in Healthy Fetuses From 20 to 40 Weeks

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
13
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
AMER INST ULTRASOUND MEDICINE
Citação
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, v.32, n.3, p.421-427, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objectives-The purpose of this study was to establish reference values for fetal kidney volumes as a function of gestational age, estimated by 3-dimensional sonography using the Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis (VOCAL) technique (GE Healthcare, Kretztechnik, Zipf, Austria). Methods-Volumes of right and left kidneys were assessed in 213 healthy fetuses by 3-dimensional sonography using the VOCAL technique. Inclusion criteria were healthy women with singleton pregnancies, unremarkable comprehensive fetal sonographic findings, well-known gestational age established by first-trimester sonography, and gestational ages between 20 and 40 weeks. Exclusion criteria were patients lost to follow-up and birth weight abnormalities. Each patient was scanned once during pregnancy. Regression analysis was used to calculate unified formulas. Results-The mathematical models calculated in the study were as follows: expected right kidney volume = exp[-1.01 + (0.12 x gestational age)]; and expected left kidney volume = exp[-0.90 + (0.12 x gestational age)]. No significant intraobserver or inter-observer variability was observed for the determined volumes. Conclusions-Reference values for right and left fetal kidney volumes throughout gestation using the rotational technique (VOCAL) are described. The use of this technique might aid in further definition of gestational age kidney volume standards to help in defining variations from the norm.
Palavras-chave
fetal kidneys, 3-dimensional sonography, Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis, volumes
Referências
  1. ALTMAN DG, 1983, J ROY STAT SOC D-STA, V32, P307, DOI 10.1016/J.JPSYCHORES.2008.07.004
  2. Araujo E, 2012, J ULTRAS MED, V31, P205
  3. Bakker J, 1998, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V24, P683, DOI 10.1016/S0301-5629(97)00212-3
  4. BARTRUM R J JR, 1974, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, V2, P281, DOI 10.1002/jcu.1870020404
  5. Bernardes LS, 2011, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V205
  6. Biard JM, 2005, OBSTET GYNECOL, V106, P503, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000171117.38929.eb
  7. Craparo FJ, 2007, J UROLOGY, V178, P2576, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.052
  8. de Paula CFS, 2008, J ULTRAS MED, V27, P1583
  9. Duin LK, 2008, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V31, P657, DOI 10.1002/uog.5208
  10. Elder JS, 1997, PEDIATR CLIN N AM, V44, P1299, DOI 10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70558-7
  11. Emery SP, 2009, PRENATAL DIAG, V29, P1089, DOI 10.1002/pd.2351
  12. Gloor JM, 1997, MAYO CLIN PROC, V72, P124
  13. GRISONI ER, 1986, J PEDIATR SURG, V21, P358, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3468(86)80204-4
  14. Hsieh YY, 2000, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V182, P377, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70227-4
  15. JEANTY P, 1982, RADIOLOGY, V144, P159
  16. Johnson MP, 1996, ADV FETAL THERAPY OB, V19, P2
  17. Johnson M P, 1999, Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, V11, P185, DOI 10.1097/00001703-199904000-00011
  18. Konje JC, 1996, CLIN SCI, V91, P169
  19. Levental M, 1998, J ULTRAS MED, V17, P341
  20. Miguelez J, 2006, PRENATAL DIAG, V26, P81, DOI 10.1002/pd.1360
  21. Morris RK, 2009, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V116, P1290, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02194.x
  22. Morris RK, 2007, PRENATAL DIAG, V27, P900, DOI 10.1002/pd.1810
  23. Ruano R, 2005, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V26, P725, DOI 10.1002/uog.2624
  24. Ruano R, 2006, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V28, P958, DOI 10.1002/uog.3853
  25. Salomon LJ, 2008, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V32, P721, DOI 10.1002/uog.6240
  26. SAMPAIO FJB, 1992, UROL RES, V20, P271
  27. Suwanrath C, 2009, J ULTRAS MED, V28, P847
  28. Tedesco GD, 2009, FETAL DIAGN THER, V25, P385, DOI 10.1159/000236151
  29. Yu CH, 2000, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V26, P1253, DOI 10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00298-2