Abdominal wall reconstruction after desmoid type fibromatosis radical resection: Case series from a single institution and review of the literature
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
13
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Editora
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, v.33, p.167-172, 2017
Resumo
BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall desmoid type fibromatosis management has been changing over recent years, from an aggressive approach towards a more conservative one. When radical resection is indicated, the surgical team faces the challenge of abdominal wall reconstruction, for which optimal technique is still debated. The present study reports the experience from a single center with abdominal closures after desmoid type fibromatosis resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent abdominal wall closure after sporadic abdominal desmoid type fibromatosis radical resection from 1982 to 2013. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included, mean tumor diameter was 10 + 5.3 cm, and the main choice of abdominal wall reconstruction was midline closure with anterior rectus sheath relaxing incisions and polypropylene onlay mesh (74% of the cases). Only 7% of the cases required more complex procedures for skin closure. Mean follow-up was 5 years and 89% remained disease-free. No grade 4 or 5 complications were observed. CONCLUSION: High midline fascial closure rate can be achieved after resection of abdominal wall desmoid tumor using relaxing incisions and mesh, with low complication rate. (C) 2017 The Author(s).
Palavras-chave
Case series, Abdominal wall reconstruction, Desmoid type fibromatosis, Desmoid resection, Surgical technique
Referências
- Agha RA, 2016, INT J SURG, V36, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.025
- Awwad J., 2013, CASE REP OBSTET GYNE, V2012, P1
- Berri RN, 2011, ANN PLAS SURG, V67, P551, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182084cf6
- Bertani E, 2012, WORLD J SURG ONCOL, V10, DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-10-184
- Bertani E, 2009, ANN SURG ONCOL, V16, P1642, DOI 10.1245/s10434-009-0439-z
- Bonvalot S, 2008, EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, V34, P462, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.06.006
- Brenner P, 2002, LANGENBECK ARCH SURG, V386, P592, DOI 10.1007/s00423-002-0277-y
- Catania Gaetano, 2012, Updates Surg, V64, P43, DOI 10.1007/s13304-011-0109-0
- Durkin AJ, 2005, J SURG ONCOL, V89, P86, DOI 10.1002/jso.20189
- Garvey P.B., 2013, AUSTRALIAN, P19
- Kadoch V, 2010, J VISC SURG, V147, pE45, DOI 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2010.05.005
- Lazar AJF, 2008, AM J PATHOL, V173, P1518, DOI 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080475
- Lev D, 2007, J CLIN ONCOL, V25, P1785, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.5015
- Mac Farlene J., CLIN REPORTS SURG PR
- Mankin HJ, 2010, J SURG ONCOL, V102, P380, DOI 10.1002/jso.21433
- Mullen JT, 2012, ANN SURG ONCOL, V19, P4028, DOI 10.1245/s10434-012-2638-2
- Muller J., 1838, UEBER FEIERN BAU MEN
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NAT COMPR CANC NETW
- Peng PD, 2012, ANN SURG ONCOL, V19, P4036, DOI 10.1245/s10434-012-2634-6
- Phillips SR, 2004, BRIT J SURG, V91, P1624, DOI 10.1002/bjs.4792
- Priolli D.G., 2005, REV BRAS GINECOL OBS, V27
- Rifaat Mohamad A, 2005, J Egypt Natl Canc Inst, V17, P139
- Salas S, 2011, J CLIN ONCOL, V29, P3553, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5489
- Singer S., 2011, CANC PRINCIPLES PRAC
- Stojadinovic A, 2001, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V136, P70, DOI 10.1001/archsurg.136.1.70
- Sutton RJ, 1999, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V25, P398, DOI 10.1053/ejso.1999.0664
- Tejpar S, 1999, ONCOGENE, V18, P6615, DOI 10.1038/sj.onc.1203041
- Wilkinson MJ, 2014, ANN SURG ONCOL, V21, P2144, DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-3618-5
- Yezhelyev MV, 2012, ANN PLAS SURG, V69, P186, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31821d0715