Evaluation practices in the field of Food and Nutrition

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_GASPARINI_Evaluation_practices_in_the_field_of_Food_and_2017.PDF (186.45 KB)
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Editora
PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDADE CATOLICA CAMPINAS
DOI
Indexadores
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
BIGONI, Alessandro
MEDEIROS, Maria Angelica Tavares de
FURTADO, Juarez Pereira
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
REVISTA DE NUTRICAO-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, v.30, n.3, p.391-407, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The objective of this study was to characterize and analyze the different existing methods for the evaluation of food and nutrition programs and services in Brazil, through a systematic review of the literature focused on complete articles published in national indexed journals. We searched the PubMed, MedLine and LILACS databases using the following search terms and Boolean operators: ""evaluation and program""; ""project""; ""intervention""; ""servisse""; ""actions and nutrition""; ""nutritional"". The research was restricted to articles written in Portuguese, English and Spanish and published between 2001 and 2015. Twenty-two studies were selected and the analysis indicates; most were carried out through quantitative approaches and external evaluations based on epidemiological theory; participatory evaluation strategies are still uncommon; Impact assessments and implementation were predominant; there is little diversity in terms of references to the theoretical framework in the field of evaluation of health care programs in the planning and execution of the evaluation processes analyzed. The results of this study indicate the need for a more comprehensive evaluation considering the complexity of the interventions evaluated using the theoretical-methodological apparatus available in the literature to understand the importance of the different perspectives of the agents involved in the evaluation processes.
Palavras-chave
Program evaluation, Nutrition policy, Nutrition, public health
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/21440
Referências
  1. Alves CK, 2010, AVALIACAO SAUDE BASE
  2. Amparo-Santos L, 2015, REV NUTR, V28, P89, DOI 10.1590/1415-52732015000100008
  3. Atallah AN, 1998, ATALLAH AN CASTRO AA
  4. Augusto Rosângela Aparecida, 2010, Rev. Saúde Pública, V44, P793, DOI [10.1590/S0034-89102010000500004, 10.1590/s0034-89102010000500004]
  5. Bandoni D. H., 2010, Nutrire - Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Alimentacao e Nutricao, V35, P15
  6. Bezerra Luciana Caroline Albuquerque, 2007, Ciênc. saúde coletiva, V12, P1309, DOI 10.1590/S1413-81232007000500029
  7. MML Bosi, 2006, AVALIACAO QUALITATIV
  8. Ministerio da Saude (Brasil), 2011, POL NAC AL NUTR
  9. Brousselle A, 2011, AVALIACAO CONCEITOS
  10. Cardoso LO, 2008, J PEDIAT-BRAZIL, V84, P147, DOI [10.2223/JPED.1774, 10.1590/S0021-75572008000200010]
  11. Carvalho LG, 2009, REV NUTR, V22, P207, DOI 10.1590/S1415-52732009000200003
  12. Castro Inês Rugani Ribeiro de, 2002, Rev. bras. epidemiol., V5, P52, DOI 10.1590/S1415-790X2002000100007
  13. Chen HT, 2005, PRACTICAL PROGRAM EV
  14. Contandriopoulos AP, 1997, AVALIACAO SAUDE MODE
  15. Costa AB, 2015, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V20, P2441, DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015208.10762014
  16. Costa NMSC, 1999, REV NUTR, V12, P5, DOI [10.1590/S1415-52731999000100001, DOI 10.1590/S1415-52731999000100001]
  17. Vargas ICD, 2011, REV SAUDE PUBL, V45, P59, DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102011000100007
  18. Dantas Clarissa de Rosalmeida, 2014, Physis, V24, P1127, DOI 10.1590/S0103-73312014000400008
  19. Amorim NFD, 2012, REV NUTR, V25, P203, DOI 10.1590/S1415-52732012000200003
  20. de Almeida CC, 2010, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V15, P575, DOI 10.1590/S1413-81232010000200034
  21. de Almeida ER, 2010, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V26, P949
  22. De Almeida PF, 2008, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V24, P1727, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2008000800002
  23. Ferraz DAD, 2009, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V25, pS240
  24. Demo P, 2006, POBREZA POLITICA POB
  25. Henrique FCDS, 2007, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V23, P2972, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2007001200018
  26. dos Santos ID, 2009, REV NUTR, V22, P141, DOI 10.1590/S1415-52732009000100013
  27. Draibe SM, 2001, TENDENCIAS PERSPECTI
  28. Dubeux Luciana Santos, 2004, Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infant., V4, P399, DOI 10.1590/S1519-38292004000400009
  29. Faleiros José Justino, 2005, Cad. Saúde Pública, V21, P482, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2005000200014
  30. Felisberto E, 2010, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V26, P1079, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2010000600003
  31. Fitzpatrick JL, 1997, PROGRAM EVALUATION A
  32. Flemming C Claudia, 2012, SAUDE TRANSFORM SOC, V3, P92
  33. Furtado JP, 2006, SAUDE DEBATE, V170, P715
  34. Furtado JP, 2012, CONTEXTO PRATICA AVA, P21
  35. Furtado JP, 2014, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V30, P2643, DOI 10.1590/0102-311X00187113
  36. Gabriel Cristine Garcia, 2008, Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infant., V8, P299, DOI 10.1590/S1519-38292008000300009
  37. Gasparini Max Felipe Vianna, 2014, Serv. Soc. Soc., V0, P122, DOI 10.1590/S0101-66282014000100008
  38. Goncalo CS, 2012, BRASILIA MED, V49, P104
  39. Guba EG, 2011, AVALIACAO QUARTA GER
  40. de Vasconcelos FDG, 2015, REV NUTR, V28, P5, DOI 10.1590/1415-52732015000100001
  41. House E.R., 2004, CANADIAN J PROGRAM E, V19, P1
  42. Lana Adolfo P. B., 2004, J. Pediatr. (Rio J.), V80, P235, DOI 10.1590/S0021-75572004000400013
  43. Love AJ, 1991, INTERNAL EVALUATION
  44. Bosi MLM, 2011, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V16, P7, DOI 10.1590/S1413-81232011000100001
  45. Magalhaes R, 2014, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V19, P1339, DOI 10.1590/1413-81232014195.12202013
  46. Marino E, 2012, CONTEXTO PRATICA AVA, P107
  47. Martins MC, 2007, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V23, P2081, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2007000900016
  48. Ministerio do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate a Fome (Brasil), 2012, MARC REF ED AL NUTR
  49. Minayo MCS, 2006, DESAFIO CONHECIMENTO
  50. OSullivan RG, 2004, PRACTICING EVALUATIO
  51. Paiva AA, 2011, EPIDEMIOL SERV SAUDE, V20, P373, DOI [http://dx.doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742011000300012, DOI 10.5123/S1679-49742011000300012]
  52. Rossi PH, 2003, EVALUATION SYSTEMATI
  53. Szarfarc SC, 2009, NUTR REV SOC BRAS AL, V34, P115
  54. Sampaio RF, 2007, REV BRAS FISIOTER, V11, P83, DOI 10.1590/S1413-35552007000100013
  55. Santos Iná S., 2005, Cad. Saúde Pública, V21, P776, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2005000300011
  56. Scriven M, 1991, EVALUATION THESAURUS
  57. Scriven M., 1986, EVALUATION PRACTICE, V7, P7
  58. Spinelli Maria Angélica dos Santos, 2004, Rev. Nutr., V17, P151, DOI 10.1590/S1415-52732004000200002
  59. Stufflebeam D., 2001, NEW DIRECTIONS EVALU, V2001, P7, DOI 10.1002/EV.3
  60. de Medeiros MAT, 2014, REV NUTR, V27, P645, DOI 10.1590/1415-5273201400060013e
  61. de Medeiros MAT, 2013, REV NUTR, V26, P583, DOI 10.1590/S1415-52732013000500009
  62. Vasconcelos FAG, 1999, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V15, P303, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X1999000200015
  63. Vasconcelos FAG, 2011, CIENC SAUDE COLETIVA, V6, P81
  64. Vedung E., 2010, EVALUATION, V16, P263, DOI 10.1177/1356389010372452
  65. Veloso IS, 2007, REV SAUDE PUBL, V41, P769, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89102007000500011
  66. Veloso Iracema Santos, 2002, Rev Panam Salud Publica, V11, P24, DOI 10.1590/S1020-49892002000100004
  67. Vidal S. A., 2001, Revista Brasileira de Saude Materno Infantil, V1, P129
  68. Viera-da-Silva LM, 2014, AVALIACAO POLITICAS

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/Outros