Exploring disparities in incidence and mortality rates of breast and gynecologic cancers according to the Human Development Index in the Pan-American region

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Editora
W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
MARTINEZ-MESA, J.
WERUTSKY, G.
MICHIELS, S.
PEREIRA FILHO, C. A. S.
DUENAS-GONZALEZ, A.
ZARBA, J. J.
VILLARREAL-GARZA, C.
GOMEZ, H.
BARRIOS, C. H.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
PUBLIC HEALTH, v.149, p.81-88, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: To evaluate whether a country's Human Development Index (HDI) can help explain the differences in the country's breast cancer and gynecological cancer incidence and mortality rates in the Pan-American region. Study design: Ecological analysis. Methods: Pan-American region countries with publicly available data both in GLOBOCAN 2012 and the United Nations Development Report 2012 were included (n = 28). Incidence and mortality rates age-standardized per 100,000 were natural log-transformed for breast cancer, ovarian cancer, corpus uteri cancer, and cervical cancer. The mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) was calculated for each site. Pearson's correlation test and a simple linear regression were performed. Results: The HDI showed a positive correlation with breast cancer and ovarian cancer incidence and mortality rates, respectively, and a negative correlation with cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates. The HDI and corpus uteri cancer showed no association. MIR and the HDI showed a negative correlation for all tumor types except ovarian cancer. An increment in 1 HDI unit leads to changes in cancer rates: in breast cancer incidence beta = 4.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.61; 5.45) P < 0.001, breast cancer mortality beta = 1.76 (95% CI 0.32; 3.21) P = 0.019, and breast cancer-MIR beta = -0.705 (95% CI 0.704; 0.706) P < 0.001; in cervical cancer incidence beta = -3.28 (95% CI -4.78; -1.78) P < 0.001, cervical cancer mortality beta = -4.63 (95% CI -6.10; -3.17) P < 0.001, and cervical cancer-MIR beta = -1.35 (95% CI -1.83; -0.87) P < 0.001; in ovarian cancer incidence beta = 3.26 (95% CI 1.78; 4.75) P < 0.001, ovarian cancer mortality beta = 1.82 (95% CI.0.44; 3.20) P = 0.012, and ovarian cancer-MIR beta = 5.10 (95% CI 3.22; 6.97) P < 0.001; in corpus uteri cancer incidence beta = 2.37 (95% CI -0.33; 5.06) P = 0.83, corpus uteri cancer mortality beta = 0.68 (95% CI -2.68; 2.82) P = 0.96, and corpus uteri cancer-MIR beta = -2.30 (95% CI -3.19; -1.40) P < 0.001. Conclusions: A country's HDI should be considered to understand disparities in breast cancer and gynecological cancer in the Pan-American region.
Palavras-chave
Breast neoplasms, Genital neoplasm, Female, Epidemiology, Gynecology, Incidence, Mortality, Human Development Index
Referências
  1. Ades F, ANN ONCOL
  2. Allemani C, 2015, LANCET, V385, P977, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62038-9
  3. Bleyer A, 2012, NEW ENGL J MED, V367, P1998, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1206809
  4. Bray F, 2015, LANCET, V386, P1035, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00135-X
  5. Bruni L, 2010, J INFECT DIS, V202, P1789, DOI 10.1086/657321
  6. Chatenoud L, 2014, ANN ONCOL, V25, P1843, DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdu206
  7. Chavarri-Guerra Y, 2012, LANCET ONCOL, V13, pE335, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70246-2
  8. Edlich RF, J LONG TERM EFF MED
  9. Ferlay J., 2013, GLOBOCAN 2012 V1 0 C
  10. Fitzmaurice C, 2015, JAMA ONCOL, V1, P505, DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735
  11. GLOBOCAN, 2012, EST CANC INC MORT PR
  12. Goss PE, LANCET ONCOL
  13. Haukka J, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022422
  14. Hebert JR, 2009, CANCER, V115, P2539, DOI 10.1002/cncr.24270
  15. Hiom SC, 2015, BRIT J CANCER, V112, pS1, DOI 10.1038/bjc.2015.23
  16. Hu QD, 2013, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V19, P5261, DOI 10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5261
  17. Jorgensen KJ, 2009, BRIT MED J, V339, DOI 10.1136/bmj.b2587
  18. Liedke PER, 2014, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V23, P126, DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0693
  19. Loberg M, 2015, BREAST CANCER RES, V17, DOI 10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z
  20. Malvezzi M, 2013, ANN ONCOL, V24, P792, DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdt010
  21. Martinez-Mesa J, 2013, PREV MED, V57, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.026
  22. Miller AB, 2014, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V348, DOI 10.1136/bmj.g366
  23. Myers ER, 2015, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V314, P1615, DOI 10.1001/jama.2015.13183
  24. Nelson HD, ANN INTERN MED
  25. Njor S, 2012, J MED SCREEN, V19, P33, DOI 10.1258/jms.2012.012080
  26. Patel AR, 2012, J UROLOGY, V187, P1978, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.121
  27. Puliti D, 2012, J MED SCREEN, V19, P42, DOI 10.1258/jms.2012.012082
  28. Suwanrungruang K, 2011, ASIAN PAC J CANCER P, V12, P3283
  29. Uhry Z, 2013, CANCER EPIDEMIOL, V37, P270, DOI 10.1016/j.canep.2012.12.007
  30. United Nations Development Programme, HUM DEV REP
  31. U. S. Preventive Service Task Force, 2016, SCREEN BREAST CANC
  32. Vostakolaei FA, 2011, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V21, P573, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckq120
  33. Wagner SE, 2012, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V118, P4032, DOI 10.1002/cncr.26728
  34. Walboomers JMM, 1999, J PATHOL, V189, P12, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F
  35. World Health Organization, PROM HLTH LIF COURS